Re: [racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-15 Thread Matthew Flatt
Sorry --- it looks like I fixed the problem for a similar example, (let ([foo ((lambda (x #:a a) 1) 1 2)]) 5) but not for your examples. I'll try again. At Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:26:09 -0500, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > I don't understand why this is the right fix. In particula

Re: [racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-15 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Hi Matthew, I don't understand why this is the right fix. In particular, the keyword application form still uses the inferred name in a way that doesn't make sense to me. Can you say more? Sam On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > I've pushed a repair. > > At Mon, 9 Dec 201

Re: [racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-14 Thread Matthew Flatt
I've pushed a repair. At Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:56:49 -0500, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Robby Findler > wrote: > > I'm not really familiar with the way the keyword expansion works. I was just > > trying to suggest "obvious" reasons why the code would do such a thing.

Re: [racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-09 Thread Robby Findler
You're right. I misread the code. Yes, changing it seems good. Robby On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Robby Findler > wrote: > > I'm not really familiar with the way the keyword expansion works. I was > just > > trying to suggest "obv

Re: [racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-09 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > I'm not really familiar with the way the keyword expansion works. I was just > trying to suggest "obvious" reasons why the code would do such a thing. > > But if you find that changing the name changes the error message, then > changing that w

Re: [racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-09 Thread Robby Findler
I'm not really familiar with the way the keyword expansion works. I was just trying to suggest "obvious" reasons why the code would do such a thing. But if you find that changing the name changes the error message, then changing that would be bad. Sorry for the noise. Robby On Mon, Dec 9, 2013

Re: [racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-09 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
So, you agree that we should just change this? On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > Oh, now I get what you meant in your original message. Right. > > Robby > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt > wrote: >> >> I haven't found a way to make it happen yet. But

Re: [racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-09 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Yes, that would work, but I still don't see why that's a useful name to use. Sam On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > Would it work to make it use syntax-local-infer-name but only use the > symbolic part of that name? > > Robby > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sam Tobin-

Re: [racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-09 Thread Robby Findler
Would it work to make it use syntax-local-infer-name but only use the symbolic part of that name? Robby On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Aha, I found the example: > >(let ([foo ((lambda (#:kk x) (λ (x) x)) #:k 0)]) (foo 5)) > > Has this error: > > application: p

Re: [racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-09 Thread Robby Findler
Oh, now I get what you meant in your original message. Right. Robby On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > I haven't found a way to make it happen yet. But even so, it seems > like the wrong name. > > Sam > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Robby Findler > wrote: > > Is

Re: [racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-09 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Aha, I found the example: (let ([foo ((lambda (#:kk x) (λ (x) x)) #:k 0)]) (foo 5)) Has this error: application: procedure does not expect an argument with given keyword procedure: foo given keyword: #:k arguments...: #:k 0 Note that if you make the keywords the same, `foo` is inde

Re: [racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-09 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
I haven't found a way to make it happen yet. But even so, it seems like the wrong name. Sam On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > Is it possible that that name can leak out in an error message? > > Robby > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt > wrote: >> >

Re: [racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-09 Thread Robby Findler
Is it possible that that name can leak out in an error message? Robby On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Currently, this program fails with a somewhat bizarre type error: > > #lang typed/racket > > (: foo ([#:k Any] -> Integer)) > (define (foo #:k [s #f])

[racket-dev] syntax-local-inferred-name, keyword functions, and syntax properties

2013-12-09 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Currently, this program fails with a somewhat bizarre type error: #lang typed/racket (: foo ([#:k Any] -> Integer)) (define (foo #:k [s #f]) 0) (let: ([i : Integer (foo #:k #t)]) i) The reason is that the expansion of keyword applications generates a name to use for the function