Re: Publishing Ratis snapshot (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0)

2018-10-11 Thread Josh Elser
FYI, did this at 15:29:51 EDT against 9b2d7b65cf271e2b3b3616d427edf2688586a56c (which is the commit for RATIS-348) On 10/11/18 3:17 PM, Jitendra Pandey wrote: RATIS-348 is committed, so we are good to push new snapshot for this ozone blocker. On 10/11/18, 11:59 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote:

Re: Publishing Ratis snapshot (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0)

2018-10-11 Thread Jitendra Pandey
RATIS-348 is committed, so we are good to push new snapshot for this ozone blocker. On 10/11/18, 11:59 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote: (pulling this out the vote thread to avoid confusion) No problem, Anu. Happy to push a SNAPSHOT build of Ratis. On 10/11/18 2:56 PM, Anu Engineer

Publishing Ratis snapshot (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0)

2018-10-11 Thread Josh Elser
(pulling this out the vote thread to avoid confusion) No problem, Anu. Happy to push a SNAPSHOT build of Ratis. On 10/11/18 2:56 PM, Anu Engineer wrote: Would it be possible to do a full Ratis snap-shot release? So, we can just consume all the changes with a single update on ozone side.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0

2018-10-11 Thread Anu Engineer
Would it be possible to do a full Ratis snap-shot release? So, we can just consume all the changes with a single update on ozone side. Sorry, I am just being a little selfish here, but it makes ozone’s life little easier. Otherwise we will have to follow up with another release. --Anu On

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0

2018-10-11 Thread Anu Engineer
Hi Josh, Can you please include Ratis-348?, it fixes a critical issue for Ozone. You might have to wait until the end of day to roll the build. Thanks Anu On 10/11/18, 11:26 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote: The only thing that the ASF releases is source code, therefore the policy you're

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0

2018-10-11 Thread Josh Elser
The only thing that the ASF releases is source code, therefore the policy you're quoting isn't relevant. There is no requirement to vote on binary artifacts that are created from that source release. The obligation on us is to verify that anything else the source release creates follows ASF

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0

2018-10-11 Thread Tsz Wo Sze
> I don't see any value for that, tbh. ... I agree that no one is going to download and use the binary. However, it is an artifact which we can vote for. It seems ASF requires us to put this artifact in the distribution directory, which is a subdirectory of www.apache.org/dist/ according to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0

2018-10-11 Thread Josh Elser
Thanks for the vote, Nicholas! On 10/10/18 10:43 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote: > - untar and then "mvn install" does work for me. It won't work if we > run a second "mvn install" without clean. "mvn install" works again > after "mvn clean". It seems not a problem. Will have to investigate what's

Apache Ratis qbt Report: master+JDK8 on Linux/x86

2018-10-11 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see https://builds.apache.org/job/ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86/335/ [Oct 10, 2018 8:29:44 AM] (szetszwo) RATIS-234. Add an feature to watch if a request is replicated/committed -1 overall The following subsystems voted -1: unit The following subsystems voted -1