FYI, did this at 15:29:51 EDT against
9b2d7b65cf271e2b3b3616d427edf2688586a56c (which is the commit for RATIS-348)
On 10/11/18 3:17 PM, Jitendra Pandey wrote:
RATIS-348 is committed, so we are good to push new snapshot for this ozone
blocker.
On 10/11/18, 11:59 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
RATIS-348 is committed, so we are good to push new snapshot for this ozone
blocker.
On 10/11/18, 11:59 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
(pulling this out the vote thread to avoid confusion)
No problem, Anu. Happy to push a SNAPSHOT build of Ratis.
On 10/11/18 2:56 PM, Anu Engineer
(pulling this out the vote thread to avoid confusion)
No problem, Anu. Happy to push a SNAPSHOT build of Ratis.
On 10/11/18 2:56 PM, Anu Engineer wrote:
Would it be possible to do a full Ratis snap-shot release? So, we can just
consume all the changes with a single update on ozone side.
Would it be possible to do a full Ratis snap-shot release? So, we can just
consume all the changes with a single update on ozone side.
Sorry, I am just being a little selfish here, but it makes ozone’s life little
easier. Otherwise we will have to follow up with another release.
--Anu
On
Hi Josh,
Can you please include Ratis-348?, it fixes a critical issue for Ozone. You
might have to wait until the end of day to roll the build.
Thanks
Anu
On 10/11/18, 11:26 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
The only thing that the ASF releases is source code, therefore the
policy you're
The only thing that the ASF releases is source code, therefore the
policy you're quoting isn't relevant. There is no requirement to vote on
binary artifacts that are created from that source release. The
obligation on us is to verify that anything else the source release
creates follows ASF
> I don't see any value for that, tbh. ...
I agree that no one is going to download and use the binary. However,
it is an artifact which we can vote for. It seems ASF requires us to
put this artifact in the distribution directory, which is a
subdirectory of www.apache.org/dist/ according to
Thanks for the vote, Nicholas!
On 10/10/18 10:43 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> - untar and then "mvn install" does work for me. It won't work if we
> run a second "mvn install" without clean. "mvn install" works again
> after "mvn clean". It seems not a problem.
Will have to investigate what's
For more details, see
https://builds.apache.org/job/ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86/335/
[Oct 10, 2018 8:29:44 AM] (szetszwo) RATIS-234. Add an feature to watch if a
request is replicated/committed
-1 overall
The following subsystems voted -1:
unit
The following subsystems voted -1