On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 02:53, Peter wrote:
> Following up on recent discussions about security.
>
> Java, River / Jini Security features are advanced programming concepts.
>
> You need security policies, need to know what permissions each codebase
> requires to function. A key server is essenti
Has anyone else ever seen this exception?
select loop throws
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
com.sun.jini.jeri.internal.runtime.SelectionManager.waitForReadyKey(419)
at
com.sun.jini.jeri.internal.runtime.SelectionManager.access$600(80)
at
com.su
On 8/9/2011 10:29 AM, Christopher Dolan wrote:
Has anyone else ever seen this exception?
select loop throws
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
com.sun.jini.jeri.internal.runtime.SelectionManager.waitForReadyKey(419)
at
com.sun.jini.jeri.internal.runtime.Selecti
I too believe that Authorization is not served well by Subject, at all. The
reason being that it is not "Role" oriented, but rather "permission" oriented
and the "permission set" is not always the right "mask" to set in front of a
decision process, without a lot of permissions that soon become
On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 Gregg Wonderly wrote:
> On 8/9/2011 10:29 AM, Christopher Dolan wrote:
>> Has anyone else ever seen this exception?
>>
>> select loop throws
>> java.lang.NullPointerException
>> at
com.sun.jini.jeri.internal.runtime.SelectionManager.waitForReadyKey(419)
Comments always welcome, due date is 15th August.
Sent to private@ because I thought there might be a couple of things
that should remain so. I'm happy to move it onto dev@ if people think
that's unnecessary.
Below is the August board report for River
Apache River is a distributed computing arc
Sure, go ahead and move the discussion to dev@.
:-)
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Tom Hobbs [mailto:tvho...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 2:20 PM
To: dev@river.apache.org
Subject: [DRAFT][REPORT] River Board Report August 2011
Comments always welcome, due date is 15th
I'm investigating extended ThreadPoolExecutor to get an Executor that
bases the number of threads on the mean number of tasks over an
interval. If successful, that would flatten out sudden peaks in the task
load, using the queue as a buffer, but would make the number of threads
match a sustaine
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 15:36, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
> 3. Use a dedicated thread that sleeps until it is time to reconsider the
> number of tasks, processes the queue of log messages, does any
> adjustment, and then goes back to sleep. This is the most reliable in
> terms of getting adjust
Comments below...
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:39, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
> I too believe that Authorization is not served well by Subject, at all. The
> reason being that it is not "Role" oriented, but rather "permission" oriented
> and the "permission set" is not always the right "mask" to set in
On 8/9/2011 1:44 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 15:36, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
3. Use a dedicated thread that sleeps until it is time to reconsider the
number of tasks, processes the queue of log messages, does any
adjustment, and then goes back to sleep. This is the most relia
That'll teach me.
This was me moving from private@ to @dev but not editing the email well
enough. I did make the rest of the suggested edits though.
Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging via
mobile device.
On 9 Aug 2011 20:30, "Christopher Dolan" wrote:
> Sure,
On 8/9/2011 3:56 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
Comments below...
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:39, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
I too believe that Authorization is not served well by Subject, at all. The
reason being that it is not "Role" oriented, but rather "permission" oriented
and the "permission set" is no
Gregg Wonderly wrote:
On 8/9/2011 3:56 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
Comments below...
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:39, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
I too believe that Authorization is not served well by Subject, at
all. The
reason being that it is not "Role" oriented, but rather "permission"
oriented
and th
Since JAAS only provides a framework, ( policy files etc are only
designed for small deployments, they don't scale) I've often wondered if
we should be providing a "default framework".
Apache Shiro is an interesting project, it's probably worth
investigating too.
Cheers,
Peter.
Peter Firm
On 8/9/2011 7:57 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Gregg Wonderly wrote:
On 8/9/2011 3:56 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
Comments below...
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:39, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
I too believe that Authorization is not served well by Subject, at all. The
reason being that it is not "Role" orient
--- Begin Message ---
Gregg Wonderly wrote:
On 8/9/2011 7:57 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
I'm interested, I've been thinking about this too, what's your
current service
interface?
The service interface is "the service interface". The mechanism just
uses a proxy, delegating object. Thus, i
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 22:57, Peter Firmstone wrote:
> ...> deployed with an arbitrarily complex authorization implementation
> > making it quite flexible. You can even use Configuration to specify
> > the security implementation class.
> >
> > Gregg Wonderly
> >
>
> So it implements the same i
18 matches
Mail list logo
