Let SVN do the merge, your changes might be extensive but I doubt there has
been much movement in those files since you checked them out. So the merge
will probably be more of a replace.
I'm hoping to get some coding done in the next few weeks - at last! So we
might have enough changes soon for a
Agreed, remember --dry-run will give you a preview of what's to come
in a merge if you have concerns...
On 10 January 2012 10:08, Tom Hobbs wrote:
> Let SVN do the merge, your changes might be extensive but I doubt there has
> been much movement in those files since you checked them out. So the
Tom & Dan, thanks for the support, we're probably looking at a dry run
by the weekend, right now I'm running the tests again, this run is
expected to pass, I'm just checking for any regressions (same code in
svn). I'll clean out all the redundant code, followed by some
refactoring to move new
I can try and find some time for you. Let me know what you need and I'll
do my best.
Sent via mobile device, please forgive typos and spacing errors.
On 10 Jan 2012 12:17, "Peter Firmstone" wrote:
> Tom & Dan, thanks for the support, we're probably looking at a dry run by
> the weekend, right
On 10-01-12 12:54, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Tom & Dan, thanks for the support, we're probably looking at a dry run
by the weekend, right now I'm running the tests again, this run is
expected to pass, I'm just checking for any regressions (same code in
svn). I'll clean out all the redundant code, fo
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 01:24, Peter wrote:
> The new security manager and policies are almost ready to merge back into
> trunk.
>
> Any svn merge tips would be much appreciated.
>
> First, I'd like to move some policy implementation classes that are at
> present public in org.apache.river.*, in
Hey dudes,
I'm currently working (read: hacking) my way through the code trying
to work out how to make it possible to remove the need for starting
services with config files. I remember a user asking about this a
while back, but their problem isn't the problem I'm trying to solve
right now.
I'v
Looks like I've had some regressions.
These tests were passing yesterday, so it must have something to do with
some very recent changes, something to do with null CodeSource in
ProtectionDomain's, I suspect.
Regards,
Peter.
com/sun/jini/test/impl/start/ActivateWrapperActivateDescTest.td
Did you try EmptyConfiguration.INSTANCE?
Gregg
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 10, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
> Hey dudes,
>
> I'm currently working (read: hacking) my way through the code trying
> to work out how to make it possible to remove the need for starting
> services with config f
Greg Trasuk wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 01:24, Peter wrote:
The new security manager and policies are almost ready to merge back into trunk.
Any svn merge tips would be much appreciated.
First, I'd like to move some policy implementation classes that are at present
public in org.apache.ri
Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 10-01-12 12:54, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Tom & Dan, thanks for the support, we're probably looking at a dry run
by the weekend, right now I'm running the tests again, this run is
expected to pass, I'm just checking for any regressions (same code in
svn). I'll clean out
Having a look at any new interfaces, once we publish them we're stuck
with them, so any thoughts or questions (Do I need to improved docs etc)
would be appreciated.
Regards,
Peter.
Tom Hobbs wrote:
I can try and find some time for you. Let me know what you need and I'll
do my best.
Sent vi
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 17:04, Tom Hobbs wrote:
> Hey dudes,
>
> I'm currently working (read: hacking) my way through the code trying
> to work out how to make it possible to remove the need for starting
> services with config files. I remember a user asking about this a
> while back, but their pr
You could try Dennis Reedy's Groovy Configuration Provider, that'll give
you Pojo's with Java like syntax. We still need to add an ant task to
generate the groovy javadoc too.
It would be nice to see that system used by default.
Cheers,
Peter.
Greg Trasuk wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 17:0
14 matches
Mail list logo
