Re: OSGi Bundles for services

2017-02-24 Thread Peter
True, better to start small and grow, just looking for some buy in, 's all. Cheers, Peter. On 24/02/2017 9:43 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: I am sure there a lot of devils in the details here, but I think that you have something that is workable, and better to get something smaller (but

Re: OSGi Bundles for services

2017-02-23 Thread Peter
When you think about classes with annotations in this environment, it also means that classes at the client may not return to the originating ClassLoader as boomerangs, unless they're resolved by a common imported package by the proxy bundle. When the boomerang returns it will be loaded in a

Re: OSGi Bundles for services

2017-02-23 Thread Peter
In case you're wondering why I've created bundles / modules structured like below, if the endpoint was deserialized into the service implementation bundle instead of the proxy bundle, it may not be able to see deserialized classes from the proxy bundle's transitive imports. In effect the proxy

Re: OSGi Bundles for services

2017-02-22 Thread Peter
Hmm, ASCII keeps getting scrubbed, so here it is: SERVER JVM __ | |

Re: OSGi Bundles for services

2017-02-22 Thread Peter
Sent from my Samsung device.     Include original message Original message From: Peter <j...@zeus.net.au> Sent: 23/02/2017 03:26:15 pm To: dev@river.apache.org <dev@river.apache.org> Subject: OSGi Bundles for services I've attached some ASCII of the relationship be