+1, Personally very much agree with the views of Justin, Thank you for
professional guidance, as you help us to join the Apache community. Every one
of us to join the open source community are volunteers, the essence of the open
source community is to share our knowledge of open source, where on
Hi,
> As I known, the 'master' here mainly means one of the github project member
> roles, others are 'guest' 'reporter' 'develop'. The one who was elected as
> 'master' will be granted master privileges to the project, here is the 'Big
> Data' project. Then the 'master' could be easily manage
Hi,
> I have finished the necessary content for the april podling report.
Thanks for putting that together, it's looks good.
I’d suggest some minor adjustments.
First off there's no need to list completed items under the important issues
section. The board what still needs to be done to gradua
Hi,
> As I known, the 'master' here mainly means one of the github project member
> roles, others are 'guest' 'reporter' 'develop'. The one who was elected as
> 'master' will be granted master privileges to the project, here is the 'Big
> Data' project. Then the 'master' could be easily manage
Hi,
> [1]
> https://rocketmq.apache.org/the-correct-posture-of-submitting-pull-request/
You may want to make it clear that GitHub is a read only mirror of the original
git repo at Apache not the original repo.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> Those repos are the temporary repos for the second RocketMQ code marathon.
I get that it may be easier to use external repos, but that may possibly
indicate an issue of not voting in committers soon enough?
> the code on the review after the merge together to Apache external repo
How is
Hi Justin:
No doubt that
> The correct URL is:
> git://git.apache.org/incubator-rocketmq.git
> There is a read only mirror on GitHub at:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq
"https://github.com/dongeforever"; is just the forked repo, and has been
changed as "https://git
As I known, the 'master' here mainly means one of the github project member
roles, others are 'guest' 'reporter' 'develop'. The one who was elected as
'master' will be granted master privileges to the project, here is the 'Big
Data' project. Then the 'master' could be easily manage the code rep
Hi, Justin
> On 2017年4月2日, at 07:19, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We’ve discussed this before [4] but I can see many links to new external
> GitHub repos on this page [1] on the Apache RocketMQ site. What are the
> reasons for the new external GitHub repos?
Those repos are the temporary re
Hi,
> https://rocketmq.apache.org/the-correct-posture-of-submitting-pull-request/
>
> As the blog describe, people who need send pull request, must fork a
> repository belong to
>
> https://github.com/dongeforever
That is not the correct URL.
The correct URL is:
git://git.apache.org/incubator-
Hi,
Can you please explain what is going on here, as it’s not clear what is going
on to me.
What / who is an "master” and what is their role?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
Is it that the review process it hold up closing these JIRAs or people just not
closing them?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> Sorry to response for this problem, we replace this word with use :-)
It’s a minor issue but I think it’s important to make that distinction.
> As fo these problems, stevenschew will do this later~
Why is it Steven's job? We’re all volunteers here and I think all of the PMC
needs discuss
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 April 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will form a
> I also not sure this page has been updated as requested. [5] These companies
> “use” Apache RocketMQ, companies are not “involved" in Apache projects
> individuals are.
>
Sorry to response for this problem, we replace this word with use :-)
> IMO the GitHub repo at [2] should be closed dow
Hi,
We’ve discussed this before [4] but I can see many links to new external GitHub
repos on this page [1] on the Apache RocketMQ site. What are the reasons for
the new external GitHub repos?
IMO the GitHub repo at [2] should be closed down and all code moved to Apache
RocketMQ repository as w
GitHub user vesense opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-site/pull/9
[ROCKETMQ-162] Fix wrong link in site post
`RocketMQ Beam Repository` in page[1] should be linked to
https://github.com/rocketmq/rocketmq-beam
[1]
https://rocketmq.incubator
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/8
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/8
@StyleTang Nice
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user StyleTang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/8
users and dev mailing lists has been added
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/87
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/10884600)
Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 31.776% when pulling
**23e14efd07f0e68b
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/87
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/10884600)
Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 31.776% when pulling
**23e14efd07f0e68b
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/87
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/10884600)
Coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 31.776% when pulling
**23e14efd07f0e68b
GitHub user dongeforever opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/87
[ROCKETMQ-161] Update runbroker.sh and runserver.sh to support user defined
jvm mem flag
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-161?filter=-1
You can merge this pull request
Github user netroby commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/7
how to setup docker may a bit out of topic
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:18 PM +0800, "Eric Liu"
wrote:
Github user vsair commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/7
I have test on windows 7(installed docker toolbox 1.11.1), the result is:
1. Should run _docker-machine_ first, it will tell you set some envs.
```
SET DOCKER_TLS_VER
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/86
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/10880912)
Coverage decreased (-0.004%) to 31.879% when pulling
**fab38018a89ace
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/86
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/10880912)
Coverage decreased (-0.004%) to 31.879% when pulling
**fab38018a89ace
GitHub user Jaskey opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/86
[ROCKETMQ-160]SendHeartBeat may not be logged in the expected period
JIRA:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-160
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by runnin
Github user Jaskey commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/64
Repeated messages is a big problem for a message queue, and this is a known
issue. When can this pr be reviewed and merged?
@lizhanhui @zhouxinyu @vongosling
---
If your project is se
Github user Jaskey commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/68
@lizhanhui @zhouxinyu @shroman
Any more advice on this pr? and when can this be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user dongeforever commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq-externals/pull/8
Communicate With Us:
maybe add the users and dev mailing lists as a supplement
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
32 matches
Mail list logo
