Sorry. I responded to the wrong email. I meant the forgotten password patch.
- Dave
On 6/1/07, sedat ciftci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you talk about email restriction feature or forget
password? I did not send any patch related with email
restriction.
Sedat
--- Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you talk about email restriction feature or forget
password? I did not send any patch related with email
restriction.
Sedat
--- Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sedat,
>
> Any chance I could convince you to please redo your
> patch with the new
> directory structure and package naming?
Sedat,
Any chance I could convince you to please redo your patch with the new
directory structure and package naming? I think we are safe from major
re-factorings for a little while.
- Dave
; From: "sedat ciftci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 3:51 AM
> Subject: New Roller Feature: Email Restriction
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > A new roller feature comes into my mind (I think,
> > this feature does not exist in
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 3:51 AM
Subject: New Roller Feature: Email Restriction
Hello,
A new roller feature comes into my mind (I think,
this feature does not exist in roller, right?)
With this property, you can decide the allowed email
address extensions (separate
Hello,
A new roller feature comes into my mind (I think,
this feature does not exist in roller, right?)
With this property, you can decide the allowed email
address extensions (separated by commas). If it is
empty, than all email addresses are allowed.
What can be this feature used for?
