I don’t think moving it to Application is going to help for things like
dialogs. (Or will it?)
> On Jan 2, 2018, at 8:03 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> Maybe, but I hit this with my mock up of the Royale website as well.
> Since a lot of things are composed from other smaller pieces, I think we
> wa
Maybe, but I hit this with my mock up of the Royale website as well.
Since a lot of things are composed from other smaller pieces, I think we
want defaults where the CSS applied to the outer element of a component
applies to its children. It looks like inherited properties have lower
priority than
I’m guessing that the ACE Editor has sub-elements that are picking up the
globals rather than the ones for the ACEEditor element. I have not looked into
this at all…
Harbs
> On Jan 2, 2018, at 5:50 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> I haven't looked at his ACEEditor class, but it is also possible that
I haven't looked at his ACEEditor class, but it is also possible that the
following would work.
.ACEEditor {
font-family: monospace;
}
And that should be a goal as well: to have the defaults.css for the
ACEEditor class to use an "ACEEditor" selector (instead of lowercase
"aceEditor"). If the AC
>Did you try this?
Ha, this works!!!... and I guess it makes sense.
However, I'll check out the type selector tomorrow...
Thanks!
Olaf
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
Did you try this?
.aceEditor * {
font-family: monospace;
}
> On Jan 2, 2018, at 5:28 PM, Olaf Krueger wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
>> The key piece, I think, is that inherited properties in CSS have a lower
>> importance that *...
>
> Yes, I think that's the problem:
>
> /* Generated by Apache Ro
Hi Alex,
>The key piece, I think, is that inherited properties in CSS have a lower
>importance that *...
Yes, I think that's the problem:
/* Generated by Apache Royale Compiler */
* {
font-family: Arial;
border-width: 1px;
font-size: 12px;
}
>IMO, that should be
the goa
I ran into this the other day but dodged around it and didn't look into it
further until now.
It might be that we shouldn't set as many properties in the * selector. I
think I saw somewhere else that other "browser" stylesheets have defaults
for each component and don't rely on *.
The key piece,
When you have compiled everything, what actually are you seeing in CSS for
this Group and what, are you seeing in the children for that Group ?
Piotr
2018-01-02 22:37 GMT+01:00 Olaf Krueger :
> Still no success... other ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Olaf
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-royale-
And this one reason we have beads as a pattern. There is no one right way
to preserve selection and selection should not always be preserved for
certain kinds of data provider changes. So, create a bead that performs
the selection preservation you need and give it a name that makes it clear
what
Still no success... other ideas?
Thanks,
Olaf
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
Peter,
You didn't misread, but my thoughts probably didn't far away into problem
resolution. That's why I was surprise why I haven't thought about
preserving selection. :)
Thanks, Piotr
2018-01-02 22:10 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent :
> I thought because you mentioned that rollover and selection were me
Hi Olaf,
Try inside js:Group -> https://paste.apache.org/NsUC
Thanks, Piotr
2018-01-02 22:08 GMT+01:00 Olaf Krueger :
> Hi,
> I've successfully captured the ACE editor but there's one issue left [1]:
> It seems to me that the Royale default font-family is always Arial and also
> 'overwrites' ot
I thought because you mentioned that rollover and selection were messed
up, that was the thing needing attention. I must have misread your email;
I'll go back.
In the meantime, I have a Button that inserts an item into the
dataProvider. Before doing this I am:
var oldSelection:Object = list.selec
Hi,
I've successfully captured the ACE editor but there's one issue left [1]:
It seems to me that the Royale default font-family is always Arial and also
'overwrites' other settings.
The ACE editor depends on the monospace font but I am not able to set it
just for the surrounding group/div by apply
How are you doing that preservation, by simply saving item somewhere before
remove/add operation ?
I'm not following the part where we you wanted some opinion. Actually in
case of refreshing I didn't even thing about saving selection, but it's
true that it should happen! It's surprises me that in
The first task is to determine if a list's selectedIndex or selectedItem
should be preserved.
For selectedIndex, adding or removing an item will get the same row
selected until that row no longer exists.
For selectedItem, adding or removing an item will keep the same item
selected until that item
Alex,
I think I have an idea how to fix things. I will make it probably tomorrow.
Thanks, Piotr
2018-01-02 8:38 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> Understand. Let me change that part to the state as it was.
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
> 2018-01-02 8:35 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>
>> Hi Piotr,
>>
>> I would not
Hi Dave,
I see two directions:
1) Going with Basic/Express module where you will be able to styling things
by CSS mostly to have it looking good.
2) Going with MDL module + things from other modules - where I believe
stuff there maybe a bit more www oriented.
Resources will be:
[1] - Look into th
I really like doing things and moving forward.
I see only one problem in case of website which has been raised - License.
If you guys figure out whether problematic stuff is ok, we should export
and public that website now. There is no point to wait, building new one
using Royale can always happen
Hi,
Over the next day or so you will see release branches being created and
commits being made to those branches and other branches by me. Do not
make commits to these release branches. This is just practice for the
automated scripts that will produce our release candidates. Hopefully I
will be
Hi -
For my own business I want to create a product and want to try Royale for the
UX. I’ll have less than ten pages and want to start with three pages one of
which will be a simple login.. I will have web services. I’ll need to have a
file upload button. I want to serve the site through Apache
On 1/2/18, 9:48 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>Please explain what is ET-Line, I don't know what you refer with that.
>The fonts used are from Google Fonts, so I think there's no problem at all
>since is what 99% of the sites use today.
>Colors as w
Hi Peter,
Welcome after vacation! I sense all ideas when I'm working with that stuff.
I think you will see the issue with indexes, even if it's not the case with
removing from the list. I will wait for your review with that index refresh.
Thank you so much! :)
2018-01-02 19:10 GMT+01:00 Peter E
Hi,
Catching up and building stuff. I'm going to repeat some things for the
befit of anyone joining Royale for 2018 (and to refresh my own thoughts
coming off of holiday!).
The initial idea of List and related classes was their beads were to be
almost static. You'd have data that you would use to
Hi -
> On Jan 2, 2018, at 9:48 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
>
> For Adobe, to sell Royale, I think will be easy if we build a basic app
> that looks pretty good. Adobe likes things done simple with good graphics.
Royale is not an Adobe project. At Apache we are about software for the public
good w
Hi Alex,
Please explain what is ET-Line, I don't know what you refer with that.
The fonts used are from Google Fonts, so I think there's no problem at all
since is what 99% of the sites use today.
Colors as well are impossible to be keep by a license, and I used what I
thought was right to me. So
Yes, Happy New Year to one and all.
I couldn't figure out what to snip, so I'm top-posting...
I've been buried with compiler and build process work, so it has been
months since I actually tried to build something from the very beginning.
Maybe we can get some other folks to try to build something
In Project/Properties/Flex Build Path dialog, see which SWCs are being
used. If your Royale SDK is/was a JS-Only one, you may be using the JS
SWCs during SWF compilation.
HTH,
-Alex
On 1/2/18, 12:42 AM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote:
>I’m getting messages such as
>1044: interface method applyImageData
Happy New Year Olaf! :))
2018-01-02 10:33 GMT+01:00 Olaf Krueger :
> I am pretty sure that this year will be ab exciting one for Royale!
> Happy new year to all of you!!!
>
> Olaf
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/
I am pretty sure that this year will be ab exciting one for Royale!
Happy new year to all of you!!!
Olaf
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/
I’m getting messages such as
1044: interface method applyImageData in interface IImage not implemented by
class BinaryImage
When I look at IImage I see
COMPILE::JS
function applyImageData(binaryDataAsString:String):void;
So it looks like the FB compiler ignores the fac
32 matches
Mail list logo
