Re: Performance issue with Datagrid / last build download issue

OK, I understand. If I would start my development now, I would probably investigate deeper this 2 beads to try to bulld something generic. For now VirtualDataGrid is working almost good. Probably in a more relax time, I will investigate this beads or for a new project. Gabe Harbs escreveu no

Re: Mac M2 performance

I do the same. Just run "ant" in the most specific folder. Harbs escreveu no dia domingo, 7/05/2023 à(s) 07:55: > I do the same. I open the individual folders and run “ant” to build. > > Basic takes 20 seconds on my new computer. Core takes 6 seconds. etc. > > I have a Project Manager

RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3

Really?... maybe I did something wrong? Now I'll see. Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Josh Tynjala Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2023 22:25 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 On my machine, I can answer "n" to download the

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3

On my machine, I can answer "n" to download the designmodo fonts, and the build continues (failing at the same TourDeJewel example as when I answer "y" instead). -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:48 AM Yishay Weiss wrote: > The reason I thought

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3

While I was having lunch, I thought of another reason why I'm not inclined to vote for a build where the approval script doesn't pass. In the past, sometimes, the Royale CI server went over a week at a time with no successful builds. We're much better about fixing it quickly these days. Back

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3

I'm inclined to vote -1 if the approval script ever fails on an RC. I could be convinced to vote 0 at best, if I'm feeling particularly confident about everything else. It just feels to me like the script should be able to pass as a bare minimum. Maybe if it were easy to skip the part that fails

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3

The reason I thought it was not a blocker was because I assumed the ant script for TDJ had never been functional. I can see now that there was likely regression due to e71b1485cce885f84cda7d7883750eebeec38b3d which was one day after our prior release. I am not sure why my TDJ test was

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3

I'm getting the same failure when running the approval script. I won't be able to vote +1 for this RC. Since the themes are incorrectly building with TourDeJewel as the basedir, I'm guessing that the theme targets in TourDeJewel/build.xml need the dir attribute specified in the element: Before:

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC2

Can you share log? From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 11:08 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC2 That's what I did, test... if I don't accept it, the compilation doesn't continue. I guess it's

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3

Looks like TDJ ant build is still failing... I don't think it's a blocker. From: Piotr Zarzycki Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:21 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3 Hello, I was trying to vote. I got following

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.10 RC3

Hello, I was trying to vote. I got following error during build ant non-swf. Anyone have same issue ? I'm on Mac OSX Ventura 13.3.1 (a) compile: Compiling libs/Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Amethyst-Theme.swc ROYALE_HOME: