only the ant build was configured, I think I
remember).
I hope I didn't forget anything.
Thx.
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Yishay Weiss
Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 16:33
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
o: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Yes. At the time, I created a branch but I don't remember why Alina uploaded
her copy.
I'm going to try to remove it. I hope to do it correctly because I remember
March 9, 2022 5:07 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
I searched using yish...@apache.org and I still get nothing.
Dunno...
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 4:53 PM, Yishay Weiss wrote:
>
> It’s published.
uld you do it tonight?
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Yishay Weiss
Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 15:52
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Probably. Maria, maybe you should remove the project and put it in a branch
until it
harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:54 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> I imported your key manually, and that worked, but you really should publish
ale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> My mistake, it was created on 2021-04-02, so I couldn’t have been published
> on April 13, 2020.
>
> How did you determine that it was the most current publ
ginal-
> De: Harbs
> Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 14:59
> Para: Apache Royale Development
> Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> Any clues why this file shows up?
>
> B
> /Users/harbs/Desktop/release_test/apache-royale-
t; Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 14:59
> Para: Apache Royale Development
> Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> Any clues why this file shows up?
>
> B
> /Users/harbs/Desktop/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf/royale
Maybe it is because the ExternJS project is half-configured. I have replied in
the other thread.
Hiedra
-Mensaje original-
De: Harbs
Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 14:59
Para: Apache Royale Development
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Any
Try yish...@apache.org
From: Harbs
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:49:22 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
gpg2 --keyserver https://pgp.mit.edu/ --search-keys yishayj...@hotmail.com
> On Mar 9, 2
Any clues why this file shows up?
B
/Users/harbs/Desktop/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf/royale-asjs/frameworks/js/libs/ExternsJSJS.swc
AFAIK, there’s shouldn’t be binaries in the release artifacts.
> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> This is the
: Harbs<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:07 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> Well, I don’t know why the gpg check is failing for me. I’ll wait un
current published key?
>
>
>
> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:07 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>
> Well, I don’t
arch 9, 2022 3:18 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
My mistake, it was created on 2021-04-02, so I couldn’t have been published on
April 13, 2020.
How did you determine that it was the most current p
ailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
Well, I don’t know why the gpg check is failing for me. I’ll wait until someone
else checks the release. If it works for others, I’ll assume it’s a problem
locally for me and see if I can fix it...
> On Mar 9, 2
gt; From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> <mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royal
No, that’s the one
From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to
I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most current
published key.
Did you use a newer one?
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs wrote:
>
> I got an error here:
>
> check-sigs:
>
> gpg_check:
> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
> gpg:
I got an error here:
check-sigs:
gpg_check:
gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 8 08:59:15 2022 IST
gpg:using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: w/o user IDs:
This is the discussion thread.
Thanks,
Yishay Weiss
20 matches
Mail list logo
