[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-24 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
It turns out that build for SDK developers are equal important as binaries for the user. I'm canceling that vote in order to prepare RC3 with fixes related to that. czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 10:08 Apache Royale CI Server napisaƂ(a): > Hi, > > This is the vote for the 0.9.6 release of Apache Royale. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-21 Thread Carlos Rovira
Curious thing is: if I run in my source tree royale-compiler folder this: mvn -s settings-template.xml -DskipTests clean install with clean .m2 all ends properly. if I run it in the downloaded RC2 folder it fails: Downloaded from central:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-21 Thread Carlos Rovira
Josh, with a clean .m2, just tried in "royale-compiler" folder to run (after mvn clean install -P -main,utils): mvn -s settings-template.xml clean install And still fail trying to get flash player 20.0 [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. *FAILURE* [ 9.009 s]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-21 Thread Carlos Rovira
Thanks Josh, I just tried with Approve xml and get similar results (I copy here) I'll try using the setting, I forgot completely about it.. But this means the instructions to build are wrong right? Here's my console output after try with the Approve xml script (mostly the same as trying to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-21 Thread Josh Tynjala
You need to use settings-template.xml to get the Adobe stuff when building the compiler with Maven. - Josh On Saturday, September 21, 2019, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi, > > having the time to try RC2. I'm having the following issues. In RC1 I tried > ANT and all went ok. Know as Piotr suggest I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-20 Thread Josh Tynjala
I thought about pushing it before Piotr even asked, but I figured that a solution more like yours was necessary. I could tell that my change would require SWF, and I know that we want a JS-only option too. - Josh On Friday, September 20, 2019, Alex Harui wrote: > Correct. ApproveRoyale.xml is

[VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-20 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
+1 (Binding) Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-src.zip Java 1.8 OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or

[VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-19 Thread Josh Tynjala
+1 (binding) Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-src.tar.gz Java 1.8 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.14.6 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or

[VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

2019-09-19 Thread Apache Royale CI Server
Hi, This is the vote for the 0.9.6 release of Apache Royale. The release candidate can be found here; https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc2/ Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements on approving a release?', at: