Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

dev@royale.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2 > > Hi Alex, > > >I didn't notice the ".exe" it should be ".cmd" > Seems that the list hung over the weekend so unfortunately, I didn't get > your reply early enough ye

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

:17 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2 Hi Alex, >I didn't notice the ".exe" it should be ".cmd" Seems that the list hung over the weekend so unfortunately, I didn't get your reply ea

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

If you don't have those variables set and are getting test failures, you will have to debug into it. Here's a thread about getting more details for ant failures [1]. If you are having Maven issues, the test results are in compiler/target/surefire-reports (or compiler-jx/target/surefire-reports).

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

Alex, just a quick response, I'll read the rest of you post later: >I thought you were running the script without >AIR_HOME/PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME/FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER. Of course!!! None of those vars ist set on my machine, I've just double checked it one more time. Hence I was a bit confused after

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

Olaf, I thought you were running the script without AIR_HOME/PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME/FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER. Otherwise you have to have all 3 set properly. This was mentioned in another thread on January 9. The README talks about SWF support as a set of 3 environment variables. We had a prior thread

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

Hi Alex, >I didn't notice the ".exe" it should be ".cmd" Seems that the list hung over the weekend so unfortunately, I didn't get your reply early enough yesterday... but I found it by myself at the end. >Looks like there was a network glitch. I just retried it and got test failures now [1]. I

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

The poms in release/0.9.0 branch should be set to 0.9.1-SNAPSHOT. There are a few poms that aren't updated but most are. The source artifact should be set to 0.9.0. It looks that way to me on my computer. Voters should be examining the release artifacts from dist.apache.org. If you want to

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

Alex, I just looked into the Maven build and something seems to be not right. On the release/0.9.0 branch all poms shouldn't have version inside 0.9.0 - instead 0.9.1-SNAPSHOT ? If I will take right now and try to build any repo from that branch I should be able to use artifacts [1]. [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

Looks like there was a network glitch. Did it happen more than once? -Alex On 1/21/18, 1:20 PM, "Olaf Krueger" wrote: >Hi, >I've stumbled over a new issue [1]. > >Any ideas? > >Thanks, >Olaf > > >[1] >Downloaded from central:

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

Hi, I've stumbled over a new issue [1]. Any ideas? Thanks, Olaf [1] Downloaded from central: https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/tukaani/xz/1.2/xz-1.2.pom (1.9 kB at 15 kB/s)[INFO] [INFO] Reactor

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

Hi, I found that I have to replace "mvn.exe" by "mvn.cmd" to get it work on my Windows10 machine. Instead of relying on the PATH var I replaced line 72 [1] by this [2]. The script is still running but it seems that it works for me. I'll get back to you with the result when it's done. @Alex I

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

HI Olaf, I didn't notice the ".exe" it should be ".cmd". I thought I'd changed that at some point. Try changing that and see what happens. -Alex On 1/20/18, 2:03 PM, "Olaf Krueger" wrote: >Unfortunately still no success [1]. > >My PATH contains "%Maven_Home%\bin" and

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

Hi, Related to environment variables it looks like this check in may of broken running of the tests? [1] Looking at the code it looks like that if you don’t have PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME set it returns null but if you do set it it ignores what you have set it to and because of that it looks like the

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

Unfortunately still no success [1]. My PATH contains "%Maven_Home%\bin" and MAVEN_HOME is also set. I'll try to investigate a bit more tomorrow... maybe I have to set something like "${env.MAVEN_HOME}\bin\mvn" instead of "${mvn}"? Thanks, Olaf [1] Cannot run program "mvn" (in directory

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

Thanks, Dave and Alex. I've just checked it and noticed that the PATH var was already configured with the Maven bin path before I started the script. The script complained "Cannot run program 'mvn.exe'" but as far as I understand now, the Maven distribution never comes with a "mvn.exe" but just

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

PATH? Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 19, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Olaf Krueger wrote: > > Hi, > the approval script fails for me [1] because mvn.exe was not found. > Even if it is probably not needed, I've already set MAVEN_HOME as > environment var but the script is trying to

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

Hi, the approval script fails for me [1] because mvn.exe was not found. Even if it is probably not needed, I've already set MAVEN_HOME as environment var but the script is trying to execute mvn.exe from a royale directory. Any ideas? Thanks, Olaf [1] BUILD FAILED

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.0 RC2

Hi, Not sure what might be wrong (and could be something on my end) but in trying out the staged release I’m getting the following error when trying to compile a simple project: Downloading: https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/royale/framework/Basic/0.9.0/Basic-0.9.0.pom [WARNING]