the existence of a particular property..
>
> Anyway: lots could be improved here, but it was a useful exercise..
>
>
> thanks
>
> Andrew
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dany Dhondt [mailto:archeme...@mac.com.INVALID
> <mailto:archeme...@mac.com.INVALID&g
;properly' rather than
testing for the existence of a particular property..
Anyway: lots could be improved here, but it was a useful exercise..
thanks
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Dany Dhondt [mailto:archeme...@mac.com.INVALID]
Sent: 03 May 2019 07:28
To: dev@royale.apache.or
Shared here! :)
https://twitter.com/ApacheRoyale/status/1124349214127947776
El vie., 3 may. 2019 a las 18:13, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:
> Great example Andrew! Thanks for sharing!! :)
>
> El vie., 3 may. 2019 a las 8:49, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Hi Dany,
>>
Great example Andrew! Thanks for sharing!! :)
El vie., 3 may. 2019 a las 8:49, Piotr Zarzycki ()
escribió:
> Hi Dany,
>
> And this comes to conclusion as well - Hey why we cannot bump our version
> to 1.0 - whatever gap user will have he can literally fill with existing JS
> components.
>
> Thank
Hi Dany,
And this comes to conclusion as well - Hey why we cannot bump our version
to 1.0 - whatever gap user will have he can literally fill with existing JS
components.
Thanks,
Piotr
pt., 3 maj 2019 o 08:28 Dany Dhondt napisał(a):
> The (very) good news is that is IS possible. To me as a dev
The (very) good news is that is IS possible. To me as a developer (and others
we’re hoping to use Royale), it is vital to know that it can be done. At some
point in developing an application with Royale, we’ll stumble on some
functionality or component which just isn’t available in Royale. At th
Hi Andrew,
First of all Thank you for using Moonshine! I think there is one good
advantage to going by your approach instead typedefs. You can redefine API
to completely new if you don't like in the original component. Those new
API may have a bit more of a AS3 style etc.
Thanks,
Piotr
On Fri, M
Hi Andrew,
That's cool! Thank you for demonstrating that such a thing can be done.
I'm not sure there is a "best approach" for doing something like this. It
really depends on how much time you want to put into it. If you want to use a
3rd-party component in your app and only want to use a fe
...@harman.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2019 5:07 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: The start of a FullCalendar Royale component...
Hi
Something that Dany Dhondt wrote recently, about using the "fullcalendar" React
component, got me to wondering how easy it was to wrap these sorts of th
Hi
Something that Dany Dhondt wrote recently, about using the "fullcalendar" React
component, got me to wondering how easy it was to wrap these sorts of third
party components into Royale.
The answer turned out to be: it's pretty straightforward. I'm not sure I've
used the best approach (no 't
10 matches
Mail list logo
