Hi Alex,
El mar., 15 ene. 2019 a las 18:44, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> IMO, we want to abstract away platform/runtime-specific implementations in
> the API surface. It is not a good idea to have our user's application rely
> on API practices that may not work on all targets. So fi
Hi Carlos,
IMO, we want to abstract away platform/runtime-specific implementations in the
API surface. It is not a good idea to have our user's application rely on API
practices that may not work on all targets. So first, we have to agree on what
width/height is in Royale.
I do not think tha
Hi Alex,
El lun., 14 ene. 2019 a las 18:37, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> Right now there are some places where we unset by setting width/height to
> "". I think those will have to change to "initial" but it is the same
> principle.
But changing "" to "initial" seems to me focus just in HTML plat
children in the cross axis
> > direction.
> >
> > I'll have to add more to the email later on, but this part can go
out
> > now. Could make a very large wiki page on layout in MXML with the
> flexbox
> > logic.
&g
verflow by default. If you'd prefer you could
> use
> > the "flex-wrap: wrap" to have it wrap the children in the cross axis
> > direction.
> >
> > I'll have to add more to the email later on, but this part can go out
Hi Mark, just created a new thread for this.
thanks!
El lun., 14 ene. 2019 a las 13:39, Mark Kessler (<
kesslerconsult...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Carlos,
> I can give it a shot when I'm at home. However, what about the
> direct width/height assignments. Should they do EM assignment too or
>
Carlos,
I can give it a shot when I'm at home. However, what about the
direct width/height assignments. Should they do EM assignment too or
should there be a new widthEM heightEM property added?
-Mark K
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 6:58 AM Carlos Rovira wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> thanks for the i
y large wiki page on layout in MXML with the flexbox
> logic.
>
> -Mark K
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:50 PM
> To: dev@royal
t;
> -Mark K
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:50 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Things that we still doesn't have and need
> in U
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Mark K
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:58 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: [Non-
M
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Things that we still doesn't have and need in
UIBase sizing
Hi Mark,
thanks for joining to the discussion:
El jue., 10 ene. 2019 a las 20:31, Kessler CTR Mark J
() escribió:
>
> Back on topic, I was able to avoid using max size
ete="onApplicationComplete()" >
-Mark K
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 2:58 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Using em vs px (was. Re: Things that we still
Hi Mark,
renaming this since I thing is very different topic.
I must say that I don't understand completely what you are trying to share,
But I'm completely open to make changes from px to em or viceversa if we
get a better result.
So first:
El jue., 10 ene. 2019 a las 20:31, Kessler CTR Mark J
Hi Mark,
thanks for joining to the discussion:
El jue., 10 ene. 2019 a las 20:31, Kessler CTR Mark J
() escribió:
>
> Back on topic, I was able to avoid using max size declarations by adding
> in CSS to utilize the flex-box CSS alignments to fill and distribute sizes.
>
Very interesting, co
Hi Alex,
El jue., 10 ene. 2019 a las 19:22, Alex Harui ()
escribió
>
> I know Flex users are used to having these properties, and the emulation
> components have them for backward compatibility (plus emulation isn't
> focused on code-size) but I was thinking that in almost all other cases,
> prop
I have a side question on this topic of size and size properties. I'm just
finishing up a 10 day test conversion of a small application interface and was
surprised to see us use PX a lot in the layout when it's on the JS side of
things. I was specifically using the jewel set to test with.
Hi Carlos,
As you noted, there is code-size/PAYG impact to adding more and more
sizing/measurement properties. After you add min-width/max-width someone will
then want explicitMinWidth and so-on. Flex has quite a few of these properties.
I know Flex users are used to having these properties,
Hi,
while working with Royale I'm finding that we need some things for in
UIBase for sizing from AS3/MXML:
- Set min-width
- Set max-width
- Manage width = NaN (in CSS this is set style to "initial")
(same for height)
I can create a CSS selector and apply it to the component. But this seems
mor
18 matches
Mail list logo
