gt; It's a project file created by VSCode. I didn't realize that I
> accidentally added it. It can be removed from the repo.
>
> - Josh
>
> On Saturday, September 7, 2019, Alex Harui
> wrote:
> > Josh,
> >
> > What is
Andrew,
I hope you and others are safe and the area recovers soon.
I pushed your list of changes except the one about Modules since modules were
in 0.9.4.
You might be able to see the changes on commits@ or at these links:
https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/release/0.9.6/RELEASE_NOTES.
n 9/8/19, 12:47 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
I ran the ApproveRoyale script. It is a good idea for the RM to run it
before sending out the vote emails. The script found:
Generated output is in the binary package in these folders and shouldn't
be, IMO. Some clean step
Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637036454346349810&sdata=DVQNmmorvdrGC3%2FjZ3%2FBypmn28rYCmgJesIj91XoIHQ%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:27 AM Alex Harui
> wrote:
>
> > Should it be added to .gitignore so it doe
d, this issue is not related to sudo or otherwise.
But it is a good idea to not sudo anything related to npm. For instance,
our installation scripts downloads and does a bunch of things during the
installation. Imagine allowing a random script sudo access to your
computer
t swf does). Otherwise it might be easier to wait
and see if you really need some of those fixes. Once again, sorry for the
delay. I prefer to get what I get in 'right' rather than have only some of
it right.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 5:33 PM Alex Harui wrote:
led that way.
El mar., 10 sept. 2019 a las 7:26, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> I tried to remove node and npm and re-install it without sudo via
homebrew.
>
> I think I got the same results as Carlos. FWIW, there is no
> @apache_royale folder in node_modules
ue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:53 PM Alex Harui wrote:
> I was going to try to publish another test package, but the npm/publish.js
> script is not working for me. Om, did you use it? It appears that npm
has
> removed the registry API and we are supposed to use an
> npm-pu
ng it on Windows.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/10/19, 7:29 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
I think I got it working...
On 9/10/19, 5:18 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
Damn I dint know about that. I would be okay doing it manually this
time
and fixing the
Om, how much testing did you do before committing? I finally ran on Windows
and no errors, but the AIR SDK did not get copied to where it should be.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/11/19, 8:25 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019, 11:25 PM Alex Harui wrote:
>
OK, I've seen beta9 put the files in the right place on Mac and Win. I didn't
have time to do any further testing.
-Alex
On 9/11/19, 11:06 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
Om, how much testing did you do before committing? I finally ran on
Windows and no errors, but the
irala
napisał(a):
> Let me do some more testing of the npm flow pls.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019, 7:04 PM Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > I may have fixed the NPM issues. You can gamble and start the RC now or
> > wa
Thanks for catching the places where FlexJS was still being used.
Your output indicates that there is a ROYALE_HOME environment variable so it
appears to be using your dev versions since I don't think NPM would store its
stuff in /Users/carlosrovira/Dev. Anyway, good to know that the environmen
$
Hope results are the expected ones :)
Best
Carlos
El jue., 12 sept. 2019 a las 18:46, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> Thanks for catching the places where FlexJS was still being used.
>
> Your output indicates
I pushed changes to update the config.xml files. It seemed to work for me.
Try beta10 if you want to test it.
npm install @apache-royale/royale-js-swf@0.9.6-beta10 -g
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/12/19, 10:56 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
I guess that’s expected. I didn’t reali
94aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637040812074543911&sdata=YCHetkEVkKAvvid7MAOETcPBuV7P%2BaMB4Ajr1UsyH%2Fg%3D&reserved=0
> > > > 2.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2
We've never put headers on these kinds of files. Not sure what other projects
do. I'm not sure there is any IP in that file.
-Alex
On 9/15/19, 4:07 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" wrote:
Should not the release notes files have the same headers that the code and
documentation files have?
IMO, the -warn-public-vars is more about the "renaming" mentioned in that link
than the "collapse".
If you have:
Package {
Class Josh {
Public var name:String;
}
Var foo:Josh = new Josh();
foo.name = 'josh';
I don't think @nocollapse will prevent renaming the 'name' property to
something ran
%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd0c7fd54329c4f08a85708d73ac6ea33%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637042498316114014&sdata=N30d559D3wJpJJ5%2BPNSp%2BLR5jg64caj3rCByjf41iyk%3D&reserved=0>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 9:54 AM Alex Harui wrote:
> IM
Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cbc8634d75ac34b1ff2a408d73acdc1c7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637042527741705917&sdata=oIgajcsJSzyrmkeIOX%2BcuPe9lVt7iukyGAhrLdlVmvY%3D&reserved=0>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:06 AM Alex Harui
wrote:
> F
Caharui%40adobe.com%7C384429ef197b497fff9408d73add9c25%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637042595795496907&sdata=ii0taRMhu0bD0Ea577FNZ9CzDn%2B60MAdu7VsVIA92W4%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:50 AM Alex Harui
> wrote:
>
>> I&#
Soq0cPow8wUfaOw2mI%3D&reserved=0
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> niedz., 15 wrz 2019 o 08:18 Alex Harui
> napisał(a):
>
>> Glad you are getting back to normal. Please review what is in the
>> release branch before the RC so we c
Hmm. I thought I'd fixed that. I swear I had all examples building.
Anyway, fixes like these should be going in the release branch, not develop,
IMO.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/17/19, 2:22 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
Getting the following error when running the ApproveRoyale ant script...
I assume that wasn't the whole log. I think we want to see the part where it
builds Core, we only see the last bit of Core. Core looks like it thought it
was in js-only config and didn't build a swf swc and/or Binding thinks it is
building swf swcs and is looking for Core's swf swc.
FWIW, I a
Changing releaseversion to release.version should not be necessary and might
break something else. Can you reproduce the failure? What is the console log?
How did it not pick up the releaseversion from build.properties?
-Alex
On 9/17/19, 10:53 PM, "pio...@apache.org" wrote:
This is an
in release steps script can influence sources ?
Thanks,
Piotr
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 7:29 PM Alex Harui wrote:
> If you had to do that, how do you know the RC is still valid? Sounds like
> there is a version number that isn't right in the source packa
t; that level. I have had to reassure people about this recently (XML -
> >>> still
> >>>> working on it - soon!).
> >>>>
> >>>> We have only touched the surface of what we could do with GCC for
> >> tuning
>
<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C72d74643fad746577a9b08d73c53debb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637044203223742173&sdata=U9ZubvSVobxtf%2BSNw9lBo%2FdA7I7%2B7rzN5JOQMJSCi%2FY%3D&reserved=0>
Responses inline.
On 9/18/19, 11:53 AM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
Alex, the idea was to make the js output itself support the options,
without any need to manipulate any files at all.
Why would you not want to use goog defines?
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https
Couple of responses inline.
On 9/18/19, 12:50 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote:
I can see people definitely wanting to
exclude it if they never use it in their app,
Originally, the REFLECTION_DATA was removed if you didn't use any Reflection
classes in the app. I hope that's still true. Although
problems.
I'm pushing RC2. If you think I should revert that I can. I don't have
anymore console log with it.
śr., 18 wrz 2019 o 16:18 Alex Harui napisał(a):
> Changing releaseversion to release.version should not be necessary and
> might break somet
ersion is not present. I don't have anything more to add
unfortunately.
czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Alex Harui napisał(a):
> IMO, any change that can't be supported by a technical explanation
> probably shouldn't be committed. Can you explain why this chang
; The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/release/0.9.6 by this
> push:
> new 55f3786 fix ASDoc js-only
> 55f3786 is described below
>
> commit 55f37864c2a1b58b00eb41bad9ae2a9c121a6c6e
> Author: Alex Harui
> AuthorDate: Thu Sep 19 1
x27;m concern by the user
experience than mine.
Thanks,
Piotr
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019, 10:36 PM Alex Harui wrote:
> Don't know. Judgement call.
>
> We've done a bunch of work since 0.9.4 to allow folks to be able to
> compile without the Ad
Please don't commit that. It won't work for js-only.
I pushed a solution for both last night.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/19/19, 11:20 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
Hi Josh,
Maybe you could commit that to develop?
Thanks,
Piotr
czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala
AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
What won't work exactly ? Build ? Or Royale for user IDE ?
pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 17:57 Alex Harui napisał(a):
> Please don't commit that. It won't work for js-only.
>
> I pushed a solution for both last nigh
I don't know. Would be nice to get other's opinions. We make these attempts
to lower the effort to get the source and work with it, so when that workflow
isn't working it doesn't make us look good. FWIW, if you clone the repo and
try to build without the Adobe stuff, that should probably fail
rspective it is not a blocker for a release.
Thanks,
Piotr
pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 18:13 Alex Harui napisał(a):
> Specifically, requiring the profile generate-swcs-for-swf will fail when
> running ApproveRoyale.xml in a js-only configuration.
>
> M
I changed the subject to try to keep the threads separated.
Please remember that the scripts and instructions are biased towards js-only.
If you have PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, AIR_HOME, and FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER set then you
will need different profiles.
Looks like this failure is caused by change 228
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 2:10 AM Alex Harui wrote:
> I think we all want to get a release out.
>
> My user experience was the equivalent of taking the source package and
> trying to build it without setting any environment variables other than
> ANT_HOME as s
o try things. That
seems like duplication of effort to me. I will hopefully have this working by
end of my day today.
-Alex
On 9/21/19, 4:51 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
I changed the subject to try to keep the threads separated.
Please remember that the scripts and i
lex,
Carlos is able to build framework by ANT so to me it's enough to go with
release. I have pushed him to try cause I thought that with some small
workarounds he will be able to build that as well.
Thanks,
Piotr
pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:46 Alex Harui napi
The value is different for each individual's computer. It is meant as an
acceptance of a LICENSE, not a workaround to avoid acceptance of a LICENSE.
-Alex
On 9/23/19, 9:40 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
Do you have this env. setup
systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAc
waiting
too long for release.
pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:53 Alex Harui napisał(a):
> Depends on your definition of small. The .mvn/extensions.xml is missing
> from royale-compiler. That's why it won't auto-download the Adobe stuff.
>
> Then almo
properties (as well as profiles):
-Dgenerate.swf.swcs=true
Or for examples:
-Dgenerate.swf=true
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/23/19, 1:29 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
The reason I am unsure about this release is that, in theory, we all agreed
to be PMC members to make growing the community o
Isn't that "just-in-case"? If the fill does not change at runtime, each
instance still called the updateView() function?
-Alex
On 9/23/19, 10:59 PM, "ha...@apache.org" wrote:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
harbs pushed a commit to branch deve
The new flags needed to be added to the Jenkins job. I restarted it but I see
it failed again. Looking into it.
-Alex
On 9/24/19, 7:30 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
This step is failing. Anyone understand what is going on ?
wt., 24 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Apache Royale CI Server
na
This also seems not PAYG?
-Alex
On 9/24/19, 12:29 AM, "ha...@apache.org" wrote:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
harbs pushed a commit to branch develop
in repository
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitbox.a
Try also adding it to arguments:
-Darguments="-DaltReleaseDeploymentRepository=release-repo::default::file:./release-dir
-Dgenerate.swf.swcs=true"
The release plugin forks a Java Instance and System Properties are not passed
to the fork.
-Alex
On 9/24/19, 10:46 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
code compiled in the application, but will have
an extra function call.
>
> Which one is more PAYG? Dunno. I tend to err on the side of less code.
>
> If you feel strongly that the second way is better, I’ll be happy to
change the code.
>
> Harbs
It depends on what you want to test.
If you want to test the js-only (no Adobe stuff) paths, then yes, you need to
make sure there are no Adobe environment variables:
AIR_HOME
PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME
FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER
If you want to test with the Adobe stuff, then you will need to set all 3
envir
Hi,
One difference between Royale and Flex is that Royale cannot detect types with
different access methods at runtime, so you will have to modify your code
slightly to tell the compiler how to generate the access code.
IOW: if you write:
remoteObject.GetVersion.addEventListener("result",GetV
Looks like I missed a commit. I just pushed the ApproveRoyale.xml I was using
to the release branch.
Try that one and see if it works better. It shouldn't require the workaround
you used.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/25/19, 4:16 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote:
To get the system property working with
I believe they are only necessary for building the compiler from sources.
Which file or document were you looking at?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/26/19, 8:56 AM, "Shiffy" wrote:
I have Royale set up on my Windows Laptop and it compiles fine.
I am now setting up Royale on a different Windows
0%7C637051156201507168&sdata=aZr5SvuHu%2Fo%2BWc1EF7MRosekWVMeAqC9yudOoLTe3uo%3D&reserved=0>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:47 AM Alex Harui
wrote:
> Looks like I missed a commit. I just pushed the ApproveRoyale.xml I was
> using to the release branch.
>
&g
+1
Package
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.6/rc3/apache-royale-0.9.6-src.tar.gz
Java 1.8
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.12.6
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives: y
N
regularly.
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 9:14:50 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Setting up Royale on Windows
I believe they are only necessary for building the compiler from sources.
Which file or document were you
adobe.com%7C42a3ce7a5d684b82c6c108d742c2ce68%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637051276838990699&sdata=I4Hl9o57gg8F3Yk3TlzTYQE3eJTYFLdzj7xsfpgPfnw%3D&reserved=0>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:34 AM Alex Harui
wrote:
> Yeah, I just saw that myself. That's becau
>
> Since the process is long (more than 50' in my machine, I'll probably
> report here tomorrow if this final experiement finally worked :).
>
>
> El jue., 26 sept. 2019 a las 23:47, Alex Harui
()
> escribió:
>
>> Than
The releasecandidate.xml script will tell you what to do on
repository.apache.org to release the Maven stuff, and release the npm stuff as
well. The whole point of these scripts is so you don't have to ask for help.
If you do end up needing help, then the scripts need improving. We want to
c
Releasecandidate.xml can't do steps on repository.apache.org. It will remind
you to go there and release the staged artifacts.
-Alex
On 10/1/19, 6:55 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
I see that releasecandidate.xml script can help me with last steps. Does it
doing Maven releases as well ?
That was fixed in the release branch. I think Piotr will merge soon to
develop. For now, define the Adobe environment variables (AIR_HOME,
PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER).
-Alex
On 10/1/19, 3:39 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
Hi,
I tried to run ASDoc to update site with l
Thanks for working on the docs.
Beyond the docs, what I would most like to see is "success stories". I keep
thinking it would help if it was easier for folks to read about how Royale has
helped.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 10/1/19, 3:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" wrote:
This is great progress!
ot; wrote:
Hi Alex,
El mar., 1 oct. 2019 a las 17:50, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> Thanks for working on the docs.
>
> Beyond the docs, what I would most like to see is "success stories". I
> keep thinking it would help if it was easier for folk
I agree there is a general problem.
In many cases, when you add a bead explicitly, the handler should be specified
on the bead itself:
In theory, the main scenario when folks run into this is when beads are
assigned in CSS.
The "simplest" answer is subclassing and adding the event me
Responses inline...
On 10/2/19, 1:37 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
Just to understand something. releasecandidate script is using tag instead
release branch to whole operation of increase version ?
No, the "get_head_of_rc_branches" target should get you the head.
> Hi,
>
c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637056893810206817&sdata=K3Jqc8tjhRGyCjE2vHIzVyDQ070L3HYxLzjBNFzrtdI%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> śr., 2 paź 2019 o 18:40 Alex Harui napisał(a):
>>
k.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2F0zvou&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce698bee1f6c14909189a08d748ba43bf%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637057837153205594&sdata=nmPTpAqG5dWUT%2BglHfM%2BQwpUEzvL%2F59P9GQ%2BqYQUvEs%3D&reserved=0
Thanks,
Piotr
czw., 3 paź
Thanks,
Piotr
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019, 7:41 PM Alex Harui wrote:
> Piotr,
>
> Again, I am asking you to get in the mindset of a developer and not just a
> user. You can see that the Ant script is making some updates. You can
> verify that the re
conflicts, but there is a good chance that some of that is due to the
cherry-picking. I am going to start a separate thread about branch management.
-Alex
On 10/4/19, 10:55 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
If we don't fix the release scripts, then the next RM is probably going to
ru
Hi,
To prove that we can rebuild our nightly build server (so that someone else can
host a build server someday and to prove we know what our dependencies are),
I'm going to try to rebuild it once the release branch is merged into develop.
Could just take a day if I've saved a record of everyt
Hi,
I think we may need to be more careful about branches and commits in the
future. I saw a fair number of merge conflicts for the RM to have to resolve
to merge the release branch back into develop. The use of cherry-picking may
be part of the problem. I wrote down my thoughts on the subje
ice like
this. We can create an "apacheroyale" account and share credentials in
private.
El sáb., 5 oct. 2019 a las 2:18, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> To prove that we can rebuild our nightly build server (so that someone
> else
On 10/5/19, 7:08 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
Hi Alex,
- release: Here's where I see differences. Once we decided we want to
release, is because develop has the final state to cut a release. No more
commits are needed for that release. So once a RM start the process and
Improvements to the Maven builds and Ant builds are always welcome. Just make
sure they work from a truly clean machine (empty the local Maven repo, build
without access to the snapshots repo, etc).
There are some issues with profile inheritance in Maven, but I don't understand
your proposal e
don't think we should
invest much time.
thanks!
El dom., 6 oct. 2019 a las 9:28, Harbs () escribió:
> Seems fine to me.
>
> > On Oct 6, 2019, at 1:33 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> >
> > I was only thinking about temporary d
I am definitely planning to start rebuilding the server today. Keep your
fingers crossed.
-Alex
On 10/7/19, 8:47 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
I think the merge happened, so I am going to try to do the rebuild this
week, probably on my Tuesday if I can finish up som
The compiler is theoretically designed to allow for different Emitters and
Publishers that can output different JS to support other module and
minification systems. Volunteers are welcome to work on those.
However, the Strands and Beads idea is not about minification for Google
Closure or WebP
I'm going to try to address all of Chris Velevitch's several threads from today
in this response.
We have a page on Migrating Flex Apps here:
https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/create-an-application/migrate-an-existing-app/migrate-from-flex.html
But it is hard to find (took me several clicks t
then ask for help
when some API they need isn’t emulated.
HTH,
-Alex
From: Carlos Rovira
Date: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 at 11:59 AM
To: "dev@royale.apache.org"
Cc: Alex Harui
Subject: Re: Acceptance of Royale by Flex Developers
Hi
I think we could remove one level or even two
27;s only for
> couple of days no problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> wt., 8 paź 2019 o 20:04 Carlos Rovira
> napisał(a):
>
> > 🤞
> >
> > :)
> >
> > El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 18:12, Alex Harui ( >
IOM, we need the committers to see these in order to fix broken builds. You
might be better off filtering out email from apacheroyal...@gmail.com
HTH,
-Alex
On 10/9/19, 1:11 AM, "Chris Velevitch" wrote:
I'd like to suggest a new mailing list be created for all the CI and
other build
When you build with AIR_HOME (which is required to create release artifacts,
since we want to produce both jsonly and js-swf in one run), a different target
called "jsonly-package" run and tries to muck with some files before packaging
the js-only artifacts. It could be that the jsonly-package
bjN8zckdXSyDfY8GlI9dA7dr6YuGwxgxGVzRzo%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:08 AM Alex Harui
> wrote:
>
>> I sent an email to private@ with the new credentials and URL. I don't
>> know how to get the old URL back
t; > playerglobal here". When I look in the package for the JS-only
> >> version,
> >> >> > playerglobal is there. I do not see it in the JS_SWF version.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > <
> >> >> >
I would
> > like to send links it requires from me login.
> >
> > śr., 9 paź 2019 o 20:08 Alex Harui
> napisał(a):
> >
> > > OK, I will switch the service to use the ApacheRoyaleCI account and
see
> > > what happens.
> > >
:32 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
Hi Alex,
if Commiters need are the target, maybe better to use the list for that
comm...@royale.apache.org
thoughts?
El mié., 9 oct. 2019 a las 19:50, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> IOM
We've never tried a hotfix release version. Could be a lot of work to get it
to work. Might be easier to just roll forward to 0.9.7. Volunteers are
welcome to try. I won't be spending time on it.
Regarding a "modified SDK", the issue is not a licensing issue, but a branding
issue. We would
Someone needs to try it. I would think the transport would work. The next
thing I wondered about was specification of destination and channels in IPV6.
If the IP is resolved in DNS then it should be abstracted, but not sure if we
have any code expecting a certain pattern of "." in the URL han
019 a las 16:30, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> Someone needs to try it. I would think the transport would work. The
> next thing I wondered about was specification of destination and channels
> in IPV6. If the IP is resolved in DNS then it should be abstracted, but
&
The principle behind the policy is not ridiculous. AIUI, it is important that
the general public only downloads artifacts that the PMC has approved as an act
of the foundation, otherwise the foundation's ability to provide a legal shield
for release managers is weakened.
I mostly agree that th
nightly builds section to that
page, so we are done.
Let me know what you think.
Carlos
El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 18:38, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> The principle behind the policy is not ridiculous. AIUI, it is important
> that th
6&sdata=kFpobNSVuN1%2FItk5YMO%2BzikIzqzMYq%2FFnqf8jQUJ68w%3D&reserved=0
>
> will push it tomorrow if nobody suggest any other change
>
> thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> El mié., 16 oct. 2019 a las 21:27, Alex Harui ()
7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637068570328531253&sdata=xBp3SsuxsqWdXaDEUDLWZChgra%2BDUVJqr1bCUFyNGMA%3D&reserved=0>.
> On Oct 16, 2019, at 11:36 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> I'm not sure how that is better than the disclaimer that was there. But
if you feel it
I did not see anyone respond in a way that indicated that I should try to get
the old URL back, so I have not made that request.
-Alex
On 10/18/19, 1:59 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
Hi Julien,
we have currently a problem with that server and I think Alex Harui is
ere's other url? if
so I can update website with the current ones. Don't think we need to get
the older one.
Just need to know new pairs of : Old URL - New URL, so I can search in
website and substitute all that ones.
Thanks
El sáb., 19 oct. 20
Hi Jason,
Welcome. I hope we find a way to work well with you.
First, a slight correction to what Carlos said about copyrights. Just about
everything of significance is copyrighted by a company or individual, so we're
not looking for things "not under a copyright".. But there must be an
Apa
ges do, I really wanna know your future plans/goals/
road map, and to find what exactly should I do with it.
Cheers
Jason Huang
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 6:21 AM Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Welcome. I hope we find a way to work well wit
Feel free to add a warning, but I would prefer if the warning was a
dismiss-able popup because the goal of migrating TDF is to incrementally reach
the point where differences are fewer and fewer (it may never get to zero
differences). It helps if the Flex TDF and the Royale TDF have the same s
Hi,
I see a DataGridPercentageLayout bead, which you did not mention, so you
probably need that to go with DataGridPercentageView. If that doesn’t work,
let us know, however, I’ve got a lot of other issues in my queue before I can
take a serious look at this.
However, one thing to keep in min
901 - 1000 of 2728 matches
Mail list logo
