RE: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #3727

The log shows this: [java] # There is insufficient memory for the Java Runtime Environment to continue. [java] # Native memory allocation (malloc) failed to allocate 32784 bytes for Chunk::new [java] # An error report file with more information is saved as: [java] #

Re: DataGridColumn visible property seems to be ignored

This looks like a mistake in the SDK code unless I'm missing something, Can anyone think of a reason to ignore true values? On 2021/11/15 00:19:26 Hugo Ferreira wrote: > In fact, seems that was not implemented (from DataGridColumn.as): > > public function set visible(value:Boolean):void{ > if

RE: mxtests failing

s overridden for both JS and SWF, but only gave an implementation for JS (and didn't call super for SWF), so I would imagine SWF didn't like that (since LayoutBase.handleChildrenAdded() wasn't called, then). But that's just a guess, from reading it. On 11/4/2021 11:33 AM, Yishay Weiss w

RE: Royale Office Add-In avaliable on github

Maria, I couldn’t find a reference to that thread, can you share it? Do you have the externs.js available to share? From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2021 11:09 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: RE: Royal

RE: Royale Office Add-In avaliable on github

y, I managed to transform echarts.ts to external from Haxe. "I talked alone on the list for some time with this"  As I commented at the time, I don't have the knowledge to be able to continue from this point. Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: jueves, 11

RE: ASDoc

ci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/Royale_ASDoc_Example/956/consoleFull> From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2021 6:06 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: RE: ASDoc I see the following file being used exa

RE: ASDoc

I see the following file being used examples/royale/ASDoc/build.xml From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2021 6:00 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: RE: ASDoc It’s built in CI server so I can

RE: ASDoc

It’s built in CI server so I can have a look there at the config later if nobody else beats me to it. From: Harbs Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2021 3:51 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: ASDoc I managed to generate

New Committer: Maria Jose Esteve

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Royale has invited Maria Jose Esteve to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that she has accepted. Maria has been involved in the project for a good while and has contributed to the Royale community in pull requests, mailing list

RE: ASDoc

Royale-asjs/pom.xml has **/*.json (…) README.md (….) For some reason README.md filter isn’t recursive whereas json files are. No idea why. If you are cautious to make sweeping changes you can just add the new

RE: Why Does GCC Not Rename This?

d previously (assuming that you write your code > > carefully enough). Details in my old threads with the title "Compiler > > options for reducing release build size of Royale projects" (and "Part > 2"). > > > > -- > > Josh Tynjala > > Bowl

RE: Royale Office Add-In avaliable on github

I’m wondering if there’s an easy way to convert d.ts files to externs, and then to typedefs using our compiler. Tsickle [1] says it “generates externs.js from TypeScript d.ts (and declare, see below)” DefinitelyTyped [2] has d.ts files for almost anything, including office-js [3]. If I have

RE: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: ExternsJS library in frameworks added. In ExternsJS project inspiretree external JS library added.

Hi Alina, I think we are due for another release soon, so if this is a big change please make sure both mvn and ant tests pass after all files have been committed. You will receive an email from royale-bui...@royale.apache.org If there are issues.

Re: mxtests failing

Could be the ChildResize merge (CI shows it started failing after that). I'll have a look.Thanks. On 2021/11/02 05:26:09, Edward Stangler wrote: > Anyone else having problems with: ant mxtests > > Flash Debug Player comes up, but nothing happens. It's a recent > change; it was working not

Re: mxtests failing

continue to search the offending commit. On 2021/11/02 12:42:51, Yishay Weiss wrote: > Could be the ChildResize merge (CI shows it started failing after that). I'll > have a look.Thanks. > > On 2021/11/02 05:26:09, Edward Stangler wrote: > > Anyone else having problems

Re: New ExternalJS project in royale-asjs\frameworks\projects

> > Thanks and Best Regards, > > Alina Kazi > > > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 3:20 PM Yishay Weiss wrote: > > > Bravas Alina and Maria. The png looks really nice. > > > > If you have typedefs for these libraries then I think you can simply add > &

RE: mxtests failing

gt; I might have time to look further this weekend, but I can't guarantee it. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 11/2/21, 10:38 AM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: > > fdb shows this line > > =121var targets:Array = > actualTarget.stage.getO

RE: mxtests failing

I assume it’s something to so with measurement of DG now depending on number of rows in dp, and measurement throwing an exception when dg is null. I’ll see if I can find a quick fix for that later this week unless someone beats me to it. From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>

Why Does GCC Not Rename This?

An application that uses this class [1] minifies to this [2]. In org.apache.royale.ace.ACEEditor.prototype.set__theme = function(value) { this.org_apache_royale_ace_ACEEditor__theme = value; var /** @type {Object} */ obj = this.editor; obj.setTheme(value); }; I expected the closure

RE: Why Does GCC Not Rename This?

e.apache.org> Subject: Re: Why Does GCC Not Rename This? What app are you compiling? > On Nov 9, 2021, at 2:13 PM, Yishay Weiss wrote: > >> What compiler option is being used? > > Maven is showing me the following output > > Executing COMPC in tool group Royale with

RE: Why Does GCC Not Rename This?

-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true is probably effecting that. What > compiler option is being used? > >> On Nov 9, 2021, at 1:59 PM, Harbs wrote: >> >> @nocollapse is what prevents renaming. >> >> Why it’s writing @nocollapse is another que

RE: Why Does GCC Not Rename This?

writing @nocollapse is another question... > >> On Nov 9, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Yishay Weiss wrote: >> >> >> An application that uses this class [1] minifies to this [2]. In >> >> org.apache.royale.ace.ACEEditor.prototype.set__theme = function(value) { >> th

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #3720

It’s working now. Did anyone make changes (I didn’t)? I am not sure what caused it in the first place. Firefox is on auto-update so that’s a possible variable in the env, other than that I have no clue. From: Greg Dove Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 6:11 AM To:

RE: Re: mxtests failing

/org/apache/royale/html/beads/layouts/DataGridLayou t.as:96] From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 4, 2021 7:22 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>; yish...@apache.org<mailto:yish...@apache.org> Subject: RE: Re: mxtests f

Re: Re: mxtests failing

in the test_mxtests branch that I pushed. Edward, you have some experience dealing with the swf side of things so any input would be welcome. Thanks. On 2021/11/02 17:38:39 Yishay Weiss wrote: > fdb shows this line > > =121var targ

RE: Re: mxtests failing

vent); COMPILE::JS { listenToChildren(); } I don't know much about the framework internals, so that's just kind of a wild guess. -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 9:31 AM Yishay Weiss wrote: > It's definitely being caused by changes don

RE: mxtests failing

> some of the low-level flash TextField is needed for. * some of the low-level flash APIs TextField is needed for. From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 11:06 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: RE: mxt

RE: mxtests failing

Looking at the flex src it just creates a flash text field. I might just create a dumb version for now which gives a new instance to clients so at least the tests pass. I think we can create a more sophisticated swf implementation later if someone is motivated. From: Yishay Weiss

RE: mxtests failing

t measurements. HTH, -Alex On 11/6/21, 1:11 PM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: I assume it’s something to so with measurement of DG now depending on number of rows in dp, and measurement throwing an exception when dg is null. I’ll see if I can find a quick fix for that later this week

RE: mxtests failing

I ended up using the second approach because Royale’s ITextFieldFactory assumes a UITextField is created which lacks some of the low-level flash TextField is needed for. Tests are passing on my machine. From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 9

Re: Error when changing SDK version from 0.9.8 to 0.9.9

As I understand it, the Maven asjs job invokes Maven with the following params: -U clean deploy -P with-examples,with-distribution,apache-snapshots-enabled -Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=c16fc57c -Dgenerate.swf.swcs=true -Dgenerate.swf

RE: [royale-asjs] 01/02: Merge branch 'ChildResize' into develop

hed a commit to branch develop in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/royale-asjs.git commit d8a61862dfa751f762a1f699b5c1016729027409 Merge: fbf8fcb 0d781be Author: Yishay Weiss AuthorDate: Sun Oct 31 20:16:56 2021 +0200 Merge branch 'ChildResize' into develop .../MXRoyale/src/ma

RE: [royale-asjs] 01/02: Merge branch 'ChildResize' into develop

opment<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: Re: [royale-asjs] 01/02: Merge branch 'ChildResize' into develop Should I add a description of what we now expect the behaviour to be, somewhere in the docs on containers? On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 6:59 AM Yishay Weiss wrote: > Hi, > > I fin

RE: 0.9.9

In previous threads on the same topic documentation was cited as something holding us back from calling it a 1.0. There’s also the marketing issue. From what I see, the active members of this community are not keen to take on marketing challenges, and this may not change in the foreseeable

RE: [royale-compiler] branch develop updated: Externc tests were failing on network error even if some of the dependencies were cached

Good catch, fixed. From: Josh Tynjala Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 7:03 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: [royale-compiler] branch develop updated: Externc tests were failing on network error even if some of the

0.9.9

Hi All, I think there is enough to start a new release. Are there any volunteers? If we release 0.9.9 the next version will automatically (I think be set) to 1.0. Are we ready for that? Appreciate your thoughts.

RE: Sanitizing HTML (was Re: 0.9.9)

Haven’t been following this closely enough to understand the overhead involved, but if it’s not big then retaining backwards compatibility in emulation should take priority IMO. For other component sets I wouldn’t say that. From: Harbs Sent: Sunday, December 12,

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: Removed innerHTML from DropDownListButton

I’m afraid u did. This line var /** @type {SVGStyleElement} */ style = new SVGStyleElement(); Results in TypeError: Illegal constructor On 2021/12/12 13:49:21 Harbs wrote: > Someone who’s using Spark DropDownListButton: > > Please check that I didn’t break this… > > Thanks, > Harbs > >

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: Removed innerHTML from DropDownListButton

Looks good On 2021/12/13 14:29:25 Harbs wrote: > I just committed a fix for that. Sorry… > > Let me know if I messed up anything else. > > > On Dec 13, 2021, at 4:23 PM, Yishay Weiss wrote: > > > > I’m afraid u did. > > > > This line > > >

RE: [royale-docs] branch master updated: edited basics

Not following this closely enough. What’s the procedure for editing docs? Is this what appears in the Royale site? From: Harbs Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 5:42 PM To: Apache Royale Development Subject: Re: [royale-docs] branch

RE: Compiler arguments

C:\dev\full_royale_sdk\royale-asjs\js\bin>.\mxmlc -help list Should list basic options And C:\dev\full_royale_sdk\royale-asjs\js\bin>.\mxmlc -help advanced Should list all options I don’t however know if this list is complete and fully implemented. From:

RE: Apache Royale Add-In publish to Microsoft Office Store

Congrats! Were any of the failures Royale related? From: Hugo Ferreira Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 4:22 AM To: Apache Royale Development Subject: Apache Royale Add-In publish to Microsoft Office Store Hi, My Add-In was just

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #2215

We’ve started getting this error: panelView.contentArea is undefined Since the following [1] changes. Amu ideas? [1] [estangler] Improvements to Spark containers to better support more dynamic layout [estangler] Removed parts that are not needed on spark-dynamic-layout. [harbs] Should have

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #2215

Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #2215 Sounds like Panel related, so probably mine - I guess these are swf tests?. Is it ok if I figure that out in about 9-10 hours On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 9:07 PM Yishay

RE: Mustella Tests

Merged it, thanks. From: Edward Stangler<mailto:estang...@bradmark.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 7:31 AM To: ‪Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>; dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: Re: Mustella Tests PR #1134 fixes the issue. O

RE: Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs_jsonly #3271

Thanks, it required Edward’s fix, adding AIR_HOME env var, and rebooting CI server. From: Piotr Zarzycki Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 11:42 AM To: Apache Royale Development Subject: Re: Jenkins build is back to normal :

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.8 RC4

I will start a new RC tomorrow. Someone please cancel the vote on RC4 as I don’t have the original thread. Other than Josh, has anyone else got comments before I start this? Thanks From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2021 7:00 PM To: dev@royale.apac

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.8 RC4

for the acknowledgement, Josh, and for the help you’ve provided so far. It’s not over yet… From: Piotr Zarzycki<mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2021 6:41 PM To: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Subject: Fwd: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.8 RC4

Still Not Getting Mails

Just letting you know Jenkins should have sent a mail about RC5 votes. I’m still not seeing some mails so I didn’t get it. Please contact me privately until this gets fixed. Thanks.

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.8 RC5

Thanks, I got the stack trace. I’ll give it some time later this week. From: Piotr Zarzycki<mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 4:03 PM To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>; Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sub

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.8 RC5

stacktrace, cause there are a lot of paths from my laptop, so don't want to put them here. Thanks, Piotr niedz., 25 lip 2021 o 15:14 mailto:apacheroyal...@gmail.com>> napisał(a): > This is the discussion thread. > > Thanks, > Yishay Weiss -- Piotr Zarzycki

RE: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #3953

feeling 100%... > On Jan 4, 2022, at 1:06 PM, Yishay Weiss wrote: > > [java] > C:\jenkins\workspace\royale-asjs_jsonly\frameworks\projects\Basic\src\main\royale\org\apache\royale\html\beads\BinaryImageLoader.as(72): > col: 23 Error: Access of possibly undefined property ISt

RE: CI Server back on track

Great to hear. How did you fix it? From: Harbs Sent: Sunday, January 9, 2022 5:58 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: CI Server back on track I spent some time today getting the CI Server builds working again. We just had our first

RE: CI Server back on track

sors too. > On Jan 9, 2022, at 5:59 PM, Yishay Weiss wrote: > > Great to hear. How did you fix it? > > From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com> > Sent: Sunday, January 9, 2022 5:58 PM > To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > Subject: CI Server

RE: CI Server back on track

nged some defaults in newer versions. > On Jan 9, 2022, at 6:17 PM, Yishay Weiss wrote: > > I had already replaced C:\goog2 contents, and added a job to terminate all FF > processes after a royale-asjs-jsonly run.

RE: jsUnsafeNativeInline

Ignore this. I think I understand why. From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 9:57 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: RE: jsUnsafeNativeInline Why is it unsafe actually? Because From: Greg Dove&l

RE: jsUnsafeNativeInline

Why is it unsafe actually? Because From: Greg Dove Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 3:40 AM To: Apache Royale Development Subject: jsUnsafeNativeInline Just a quick note to let you know about a new feature. One you probably don't want to

RE: RoyaleUnit failing on M1

I did look at the compiler code and noticed this in RoyaleUnitSocketThread.java private void parseInboundMessages() throws IOException { while (true) { if (server.isPending()) { //try again later try {

RE: Release Step 002 Succeeded

Ok, good to know. Is the release bad timing for anyone else? I know Greg is working on some stuff, but we’ve agreed it could take a while and as the last release was almost 6 months ago, It’s probably time. Generally I think we should be aiming for a release every month. From:

RE: Swc Compiler Version and Binary Reproducibility

I had the following in my settings.xml, not sure why it was there to begin with. Sorry for the noise. royale-release 0.9.8 From: Yishay Weiss

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2

this release in the DISCUSSION thread not this VOTE thread. Thanks, Yishay Weiss

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

le 0.9.9 RC3 This is the discussion thread. Thanks, Yishay Weiss

RE: Implementing JS renderer from Royale

Do you have a concrete example? From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2022 1:27 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Implementing JS renderer from Royale Hi, I'm asking for guidance... Lately I'm actively using several JS

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

wf in 0.602 seconds [INFO] Mar 13, 2022 12:00:56 PM com.google.javascript.jscomp.LoggerErrorManager printSummary [INFO] INFO: 0 error(s), 0 warning(s), 97.8% typed [INFO] The project 'MenuExample' has been successfully compiled and optimized. From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com&g

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

>Josh’s pick I meant Josh’s fix of course (being picky here). From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2022 9:12 AM To: Josh Tynjala<mailto:joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>; dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: RE: [DIS

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

e DISCUSSION thread not this VOTE thread. Thanks, Yishay Weiss

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

> The ant examples are only built after release approval. Actually, I think I misread the scripts. I don’t think examples are built with ant anywhere in the release process except upon approval. If somebody wants to inform otherwise please do. From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotma

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

threads get sent to the mailing list. -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 11:35 PM wrote: > This is the discussion thread. > > Thanks, > Yishay Weiss

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC3

d libraries > in Royale. > > I will see if I can get these issues fixed for the next RC. As things > are right now, I would vote -1. > > -- > Josh Tynjala > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 11:35 PM wrote: > >> This is the discussion thread. >> >> Thanks, >> Yishay Weiss > >

RE: Issues with EventDispatcher in JS

tomorrow my time, but if someone wants to do it today your time, please go for it. On Thu, 10 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm Yishay Weiss, wrote: > I think this needs to either be fixed or reverted before I start rc3 > > From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March

RE: Issues with EventDispatcher in JS

Actually, no worries. I’ll wait for your fix. From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 9:38 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: RE: Issues with EventDispatcher in JS Is there a way to test this quickly if I mak

RE: Issues with EventDispatcher in JS

I think this needs to either be fixed or reverted before I start rc3 From: Harbs Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 11:07 AM To: Apache Royale Development Subject: Re: Issues with EventDispatcher in JS It should probably be: if

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2

gt; >> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyal...@gmail.com >> <mailto:apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> This is the discussion thread. >> >> Thanks, >> Yishay Weiss >

RE: Implementing JS renderer from Royale

Maybe if you gave an example of standard JS way versus what you are hoping to do in Royale I could comment. I’m still not clear what an InspireTree view is and how it would be used in Royale. From: Maria Jose Esteve Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2022 4:31 PM To:

RE: Royale_Release_Step_011 - Build # 24 - Failure!

ASDoc is failing which is blocking the build. Greg, I have found out commit 63c94366f533bc1384401cdd6ba1f20057b4d999 breaks the ASDoc example, specifically the following line: import mx.events.ResourceEvent; ResourceEvent; Do you (or anyone else) have a hunch why that may be?

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2

022, at 1:13 PM, Yishay Weiss wrote: > > No, that’s the one > > From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org > <mailto:dev@royale

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2

If you look here [1], then you need to import the last one (one after yours). You can search the fingerprint [2]. [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS [2] F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093 From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, M

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2

022, at 3:18 PM, Yishay Weiss wrote: > > My mistake, it was created on 2021-04-02, so I couldn’t have been published > on April 13, 2020. > > How did you determine that it was the most current published key? > > > > From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com> >

RE: [MAVEN-BUILD] Royale » Royale-asjs - Build # 2272 - Still Failing!

Some of the snapshot versions in develop are updated after the rc is approved. We have an ant script in releasecandidate.xml that does that. Having said that, ExternsJS is not listed as a module in the projects pom (framework\projects\pom.xml), so I think this will need to be updated manually.

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2

Below is the output for the methods I used to search for it, so I think we’re good. C:\dev\flexjs\royale-asjs>gpg --keyserver https://pgp.mit.edu/ --search-keys F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093 gpg: data source: https://pgp.mit.edu:443 (1) Yishay Weiss 4096 bit RSA

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2

uot;wasted Harb's time" with the configuration and unit tests (sorry Harb). I'm sorry, could you do it tonight? Hiedra -Mensaje original- De: Yishay Weiss Enviado el: miércoles, 9 de marzo de 2022 15:52 Para: dev@royale.apache.org Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Roya

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2

0.9.9-bin-js-swf/royale-asjs/frameworks/js/libs/ExternsJSJS.swc > > AFAIK, there’s shouldn’t be binaries in the release artifacts. > >> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyal...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> This is the discussion thread. >> >> Thanks, >> Yishay Weiss >

RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2

USS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2 I imported your key manually, and that worked, but you really should publish it. Manual imports shouldn’t be necessary. > On Mar 9, 2022, at 3:33 PM, Yishay Weiss wrote: > > If you look here [1], then you need to import the last one (one aft

RE: Swc Compiler Version and Binary Reproducibility

in the all repos, and when that’s done we can update the top level RELEASE_NOTES under royale-asjs\releasemgr\RELEASE_NOTES. After that’s done I’ll start a new RC and will keep an eye on server versions for typedefs. Thanks. From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Th

RE: Swc Compiler Version and Binary Reproducibility

wler Hat LLC<https://bowlerhat.dev> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 10:04 AM Yishay Weiss mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>> wrote: The typedef swcs produced on my machine are different to the ones produced on CI which breaks the build process. I noticed this difference in the catalog

RE: Swc Compiler Version and Binary Reproducibility

ynj...@bowlerhat.dev> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 7:06 PM To: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Cc: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: Re: Swc Compiler Version and Binary Reproducibility Sounds good. I've updated the release notes with summaries of my

RE: Swc Compiler Version and Binary Reproducibility

osh Tynjala<mailto:joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> Subject: Re: Swc Compiler Version and Binary Reproducibility Did the modules stuff go in develop or in a branch? On 2/28/22, 3:46 AM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: Does anybody else want to add their changes? From memory, Harbs has

RE: Jewel TextAlign bead does not have priority

Sounds like the current behavior is buggy, so as long as your solution improves the situation I would approve. I started thinking about what would happen if there was another bead added that needed to change the same style attribute – what would happen and what should happen? This relates IMO

Swc Compiler Version and Binary Reproducibility

The typedef swcs produced on my machine are different to the ones produced on CI which breaks the build process. I noticed this difference in the catalog (though it’s not the only one) Can somebody explain why the build# is different? I had a look at SWCTarget.java in the

RE: Swc Compiler Version and Binary Reproducibility

ive-pom-mojo.html> From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:09 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>; Josh Tynjala<mailto:joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> Subject: RE: Swc Compiler Version and Binary Reproducib

RE: Masked TextInput or Bead

Not aware of one. If you’re using Jewel, there are all sorts of similar beads you can model after under royale-asjs\frameworks\projects\Jewel\src\main\royale\org\apache\royale\jewel\beads\controls\textinput From: Hugo Ferreira Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2022 3:08

Static Analysis Tool for Royale (or Flex)

Hi, My client is asking if there are static analysis tools for Royale other than SonarQube, which only covers as3 (no mxml). I am not personally aware of any but I thought I’d ask here. Thanks.

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Royale 0.9.9 released

The Apache Royale community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Royale 0.9.9. The Apache Royale project is the next generation of the Apache Flex SDK. It lets developers use MXML and ActionScript 3 to generate HTML/JS/CSS applications which can run natively in browsers. The

RE: NPM Credentials Problem Blocking Release

> the npm releases are still 0.9.8 Where does that show? From: Yishay Weiss<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2022 7:56 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: RE: NPM Credentials Problem Blocking Release Thanks for catching tha

RE: NPM Credentials Problem Blocking Release

t.dev> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:36 AM Yishay Weiss wrote: > Ok, looks like we’ve figured it out for now with a temp password. 2FA does > not seem to be a requirement. We will update the private list with the new > credentials when that’s ready. > > From: Piotr Zarzycki<mail

RE: NPM Credentials Problem Blocking Release

Credentials Problem Blocking Release I approved and should have added it again to the allow list. It came through. If it expired already, try again. Hopefully it’ll work... > On Mar 31, 2022, at 10:01 PM, Yishay Weiss wrote: > > I just tried logging in, got the OTP sent messa

RE: NPM Credentials Problem Blocking Release

ithout moderation. I don't remember if we > tried > > that. It works on the other lists. There might be a restriction on > > private@. > > > > -Alex > > > > On 3/30/22, 7:55 PM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: &g

RE: NPM Credentials Problem Blocking Release

r if we tried > that. It works on the other lists. There might be a restriction on > private@. > > -Alex > > On 3/30/22, 7:55 PM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: > > Piotr, being the moderator, is receiving them but it’s hard for me to

RE: Static Analysis Tool for Royale (or Flex)

e to find it again with some sleuthing. -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 12:21 PM Yishay Weiss wrote: > Hi, > > My client is asking if there are static analysis tools for Royale other > than SonarQube, which only covers as3 (no mxml). I am

RE: NPM Credentials Problem Blocking Release

nt: apache-royale-owner The other: Your npm password reset -Alex On 3/29/22, 3:37 AM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: Ok, looks like we’ve figured it out for now with a temp password. 2FA does not seem to be a requirement. We will update the private list with the new credentials when that’

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >