Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.0 RC0

2017-05-17 Thread Prateek Maheshwari
Resent the CANCEL email, hopefully it makes it this time. - Prateek On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Navina Ramesh (Apache) wrote: > Prateek told me that he sent out a cancel email. It didn't reach the > mail-archive I think. Lately, we have this kind of issues where the emails > are not reachi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.0 RC0

2017-05-17 Thread Navina Ramesh (Apache)
Prateek told me that he sent out a cancel email. It didn't reach the mail-archive I think. Lately, we have this kind of issues where the emails are not reaching our dev list. On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Yi Pan wrote: > Hi, all, > > Based on the conversation above, can we officially cancel t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.0 RC0

2017-05-17 Thread Navina Ramesh
Prateek told me that he sent out a cancel email. It didn't reach the mail-archive I think. Lately, we have this kind of issues where the emails are not reaching our dev list. On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Yi Pan wrote: > Hi, all, > > Based on the conversation above, can we officially cancel t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.0 RC0

2017-05-17 Thread Yi Pan
Hi, all, Based on the conversation above, can we officially cancel this vote? Thanks! -Yi On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Ignacio Solis wrote: > Thanks! > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Navina Ramesh > wrote: > > I will try to get the patch out today. Work doesn't look trivial. I am on

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.0 RC0

2017-05-15 Thread Ignacio Solis
Thanks! On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Navina Ramesh wrote: > I will try to get the patch out today. Work doesn't look trivial. I am on > it. > > Navina > > On May 14, 2017 23:10, "Ignacio Solis" wrote: > >> We should hold off until it is solved. How long will it take to fix this? >> >> On Su

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.0 RC0

2017-05-15 Thread Navina Ramesh
I will try to get the patch out today. Work doesn't look trivial. I am on it. Navina On May 14, 2017 23:10, "Ignacio Solis" wrote: > We should hold off until it is solved. How long will it take to fix this? > > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Navina Ramesh (Apache) > wrote: > > I just chang

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.0 RC0

2017-05-14 Thread Ignacio Solis
We should hold off until it is solved. How long will it take to fix this? On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Navina Ramesh (Apache) wrote: > I just changed the status of this JIRA to "BLOCKER" - > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-1128 > > This causes a bug in standalone deployment wher

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.0 RC0

2017-05-14 Thread Navina Ramesh (Apache)
I just changed the status of this JIRA to "BLOCKER" - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-1128 This causes a bug in standalone deployment where any failure in the barrier protocol stops the scheduled executorservice. Unfortunately, CoordinationUtils creates its own scheduled executorservic

Re: [VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.0 RC0

2017-05-14 Thread Boris S
I think we need to add SAMZA-1286 and SAMZA-1279 to the release . On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Jagadish Venkatraman wrote: > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 0.13.0. Thanks to > everyone who has contributed to this release. We are very glad to see some > new contributor

[VOTE] Apache Samza 0.13.0 RC0

2017-05-10 Thread Jagadish Venkatraman
This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 0.13.0. Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release. We are very glad to see some new contributors and features in this release. The release candidate can be downloaded from here: http://home.apache.org/~jagadish/samza-0.13.0-rc0/