Hi Regina,
On Tuesday, 2008-12-09 20:07:53 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> > I've hoped that the patch in 94555 (CHISQDIST) will get into odff05 and
> > that the feature will be in OOo3.1. Will that happen or is something
> > wrong with that patch?
>
> No, I simply was busy with getting a few CW
Hi Regina,
On Tuesday, 2008-12-09 16:33:01 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote:
> I've hoped that the patch in 94555 (CHISQDIST) will get into odff05 and
> that the feature will be in OOo3.1. Will that happen or is something
> wrong with that patch?
No, I simply was busy with getting a few CWSs rfQ
Hi Eike,
Eike Rathke schrieb:
Hi Regina,
On Tuesday, 2008-12-02 18:34:25 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote:
I have updated the patches in issue 94555. The work in that area is
finished. Please have a look.
Thanks a lot!
I've hoped that the patch in 94555 (CHISQDIST) will get into odff05 and
Hi Eike,
Eike Rathke schrieb:
Hi Regina,
On Tuesday, 2008-12-02 18:34:25 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote:
I have updated the patches in issue 94555. The work in that area is
finished. Please have a look.
Thanks a lot!
I now want to go further on to BETADIST. Should I make the necessary
cha
Hi Regina,
On Tuesday, 2008-12-02 18:34:25 +0100, Regina Henschel wrote:
> I have updated the patches in issue 94555. The work in that area is
> finished. Please have a look.
Thanks a lot!
> I now want to go further on to BETADIST. Should I make the necessary
> changes based on the original
Hi Eike,
I have updated the patches in issue 94555. The work in that area is
finished. Please have a look.
I now want to go further on to BETADIST. Should I make the necessary
changes based on the original odff05 or on the version, which contains
already the changes from issue 94555?
kind
