invalid.ini
PRE-CREATION
sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/tools/TestSentryConfigToolSolr.java
PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46058/diff/
Testing
---
Ran the unit tests successfully.
Thanks,
Gregory Chanan
Are commits allowed again? I assume so, since I've seen some, but I didn't
see a notification on this list.
Thanks,
Greg
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Hao Hao wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>The official branching for Sentry 1.7.0 is about to start. Please hold
> off any commits until it is finish
s.apache.org/r/46058/diff/
Testing
---
Ran the unit tests successfully.
Thanks,
Gregory Chanan
rs so they get e-mails sent to both lists?
Greg
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Ma, Junjie wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I forward the notification from Hao to you.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Colin Ma(Ma Jun Jie)
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Gregory Chanan [mailto:gch
o). Now as far
> as I know everything should be sent to dev@sentry.apache.org, as
> dev@sentry.incubator should be deprecated. Thanks!
>
> Best,
> Hao
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Gregory Chanan
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks!
> >
> > It looks like th
/sentry/provider/db/generic/tools/TestSentryConfigToolSolr.java
7149f17ae11b96fad279a652a2ea7d7848e97d59
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46548/diff/
Testing
---
Ran the new test.
Thanks,
Gregory Chanan
backend layer?
It seems unlikely to me that the average client actually wants caching or need
caching, whereas an arbitrary external service probably does.
- Gregory Chanan
On May 2, 2016, 9:32 p.m., Ashish Singh wrote:
>
> ---
>
---
Thanks,
Gregory Chanan
> On May 2, 2016, 9:45 p.m., Gregory Chanan wrote:
> > Why put the caching at the client layer instead of the provider backend
> > layer? It seems unlikely to me that the average client actually wants
> > caching or need caching, whereas an arbitrary external servi
> On May 2, 2016, 9:45 p.m., Gregory Chanan wrote:
> > Why put the caching at the client layer instead of the provider backend
> > layer? It seems unlikely to me that the average client actually wants
> > caching or need caching, whereas an arbitrary external servi
ry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/generic/service/thrift/SentryGenericServiceClientDefaultImpl.java
(line 668)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/#comment195399>
Use nanoTime, see here for more information:
http://memorynotfound.com/calculating-elapsed-time-java/ (you can still take
millis as
Have you tried enabling kerberos debugging on the server side?
On May 5, 2016 10:50 AM, "Sravya Tirukkovalur" wrote:
> Forwarding it to dev@s.a.o instead of dev@s.i.a.o
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Sravya Tirukkovalur
> Date: Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:51 PM
> Subject: Sentry
acy of system timers and schedulers"...sort of unclear if that means
the cache will be updated in that time; but that's not a high precision thing
we really care about, so I'd just be loose with it.
Also, "sleepIfCachingEnabled" I would expect to...sleep if caching was
/47084/diff/
Testing
---
Manually tested, verified that the message is printed to the log.
Thanks,
Gregory Chanan
ovider-file/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/file/SimpleFileProviderBackend.java
(line 233)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/#comment196316>
you shouldn't be writting the cache directly, just build the temp table and
create the cache + cache provider backend with that. Go
> On May 8, 2016, 4:35 a.m., Gregory Chanan wrote:
> > sentry-provider/sentry-provider-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/common/CacheProvider.java,
> > line 23
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/diff/6/?file=1375790#file1375790line23>
&g
;https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/#comment197247>
same here.
sentry-provider/sentry-provider-common/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/common/TableCache.java
(line 70)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/#comment197248&g
e/sentry/provider/file/SimpleFileProviderBackend.java
(line 331)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/#comment197478>
just return the internal cache here, get rid of getCache() function.
- Gregory Chanan
On May 13, 2016, 4:20 p.m., Ashish Singh wrote:
>
>
/#comment197491>
this should be cache.getCache(). Right now you are using internal
knowledge of how the TableCache works -- if you just use cache.getCache you can
swap out the TableCache implementation and this will still work.
- Gregory Chanan
On May 13, 2016, 9:08 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46909/#review133206
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Gregory Chanan
On May 13, 2016, 9:27
f: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47566/diff/
Testing
---
Ran the sentry-provider-db unit tests.
Thanks,
Gregory Chanan
Hi Bhooshan,
Take a look at SENTRY-1229. It's only supported for the generic service
and it makes multiple calls and there's no callback mechanism. But it's a
start.
Greg
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Bhooshan Mogal
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a product where I want to use Sentry to aut
22 matches
Mail list logo
