Sounds like we have a consensus - use the format
SENTRY-123: Fix important feature (Hacker Master, reviewed by Foo Bar and
Ben Hur)
Any other comments
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Sergio Pena
wrote:
> Agree.
>
> I've seen the following format repeated in other
Sasha,
I agree we should have consistent format. It is better to include author,
then followed by reviewer. So we can have all information at a glance.
Lina
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Alexander Kolbasov
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that recently our commit messages
Hello,
I noticed that recently our commit messages became veru inconsistent:
The format we used to have:
SENTRY-2014: incorrect handling of HDFS paths with multiple forward slashes
(Vadim Spector, reviewed by Sergio Pena and Arjun Mishra)
SENTRY-2015 - Refactor Command implementations
-