Re: Proposal to have sentry 1.9 release.

There is support for hms notifications in Hive 1.1. DbNotificationListener exists on this version, but there are several fixes on Hive 2.0 that would allow us to have a better functionality of HA. There are known issues that are solved on Hive 2.3, though, such as: - Sentry/HMS sync event

Re: Proposal to have sentry 1.9 release.

I think the problem is that sentry 1 must work with hive 1 as well. On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 07:32 Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda wrote: > Sasha, > > You got me wrong. I'm proposed to go with Hive 2.0 using authv1 for sentry > 1.9.0 release. > > -Kalyan > > -Kalyan > > On Thu, Oct

Re: Proposal to have sentry 1.9 release.

Sasha, You got me wrong. I'm proposed to go with Hive 2.0 using authv1 for sentry 1.9.0 release. -Kalyan -Kalyan On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Alexander Kolbasov wrote: > Sergio - what is the state of HMS notifications in Hive1? Do they even > exist there? > > Kalyan -

Re: Proposal to have sentry 1.9 release.

Sergio - what is the state of HMS notifications in Hive1? Do they even exist there? Kalyan - I am not sure that the new Sentry architecture which is based on HMS notifications can work with Hive 1 at all. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda < kkal...@cloudera.com> wrote: >

Re: Proposal to have sentry 1.9 release.

The major reason why we wanted to move to Sentry 2.0 was the dependency on Hive version. Sentry HA completely relies on HMS notifications which are not available in Hive 1, more over it relies on fixes that are only available in Hive 2.4. Sentry 1 should work with Hive 1, so we can't make Sentry

Re: Proposal to have sentry 1.9 release.

Fine with me, it makes sense to get the HA work out there if it is ready to be used. What kind of time-line are you thinking of for 1.9.0? Colm. On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Sergio Pena wrote: > It sounds good to do. One of the reasons to do sentry 2.0 was the >

Re: Proposal to have sentry 1.9 release.

It sounds good to do. One of the reasons to do sentry 2.0 was the integration with hive-authz2, but this is taking time for quality concerns. Perhaps is good to cut the branch for 1.9 now before starting to add other incompatible changes to the master branch. +1 to release 1.9 + ha work. On Wed,

Proposal to have sentry 1.9 release.

Hi all, I understand that the major areas that still needs significant amount work on sentry 2.0 are 1. Integrating with Hive 2.0 2. Updating the java version 3. Integrating with Solr-7 *Integrating with Hive 2.0: *While testing stuff with Hive locally, we found couple of issues with