There is a pdf file for the LRA specification [1] for reviewing.
[1]
https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-lra/files/2546285/microprofile-lra-spec.pdf
Zheng Feng 于2018年11月2日周五 上午9:30写道：
> Well, it is a good idea and I will try my best to compare two of them.
>
> Willem Jiang 于2018年11月1日周四 下午
Yes you are right. My understanding is that "the request method XXX is not
allowed in upload", so that it can be used.
We are thinking about PR to vert.x, maybe we can create a PR for them to
review.
-- --
??: "yhs0092";
: 2018??11??5??(?
Hi @bi...@qq.com , I've searched for the descriptions about HTTP status 405,
but the description[1] seems to indicate that this status is for those cases
that request method is wrong, e.g. the request method is GET but the server
only accept POST. So is it proper to use 405 in this scenario?
If
Maybe we can send a
405 Method Not Allowed
message.
-- --
??: "yhs0092";
: 2018??11??1??(??) 8:56
??: "dev@servicecomb.apache.org";
: Re: [Discuss][JavaChassis] about customization of
vertxorg.apache.servicecomb.trans
