On 10/21/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> > I sent out an e-mail to the Shale mailing list a week or so ago about the
> > possibility of merging Shale with MyFaces. Development of Shale has become
> > somewhat stale, and I'd rather see MyFaces pickup the pieces than have the
On 10/18/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/10/18, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I always loved the idea that MyFaces is the umbrella project for JSF
> > activities at Apache.
>
> The problem is that Apache does not like umbrella project at all :-)
> You might rememb
Forwarding to the Shale project, which has the same issue:
http://tinyurl.com/28e558
Niall
On 6/21/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been working with Sun to get the appropriate legal notices
changed in the relevant files: the xsd for faces 1.2 and the dtd for
faces 1.0 and 1
On 3/15/07, Hermod Opstvedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Points taken - I just forgot to add the issuenumber as a start to the
comments. I'll take a look at the autoprops on TortoiseSVN.
Theres some notes on the struts wiki that might help here:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMaintenance
This is a question for the user list - this "dev" list is for
discussing the development of Shale:
http://shale.apache.org/mail-lists.html
Also searching the mail archives is always a good policy before
posting a question - I believe this has the answer to your question:
http://tinyurl.com/27j
On 2/14/07, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> FYI
>
Besides the missing trim function, the shale version of this script file
overrides the "jcv_retrieveFormName" function. The form name is us
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 14, 2007 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: shale-validator.jar and commons-validator.jar both
contains different validateUtilities.js
To: Jakarta Commons Users List
On 2/14/07, Hasan Turksoy <[EMAIL
On 1/12/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This ones thoroughly OT, sorry list.
On 1/11/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/11/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Here is the relevant recent example I mentioned in th
On 1/11/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/11/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Struts posts a test build for a couple of weeks and then votes on the
> release and quality at the same time. If theres alot of change then
> the release migh
On 1/10/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/9/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The thing I think is confusing is that you didn't vote on a "quality"
> - as I understand you're thinking of having different quality grades
>
On 1/9/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/9/07, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Pending 24 hours for reporting any errors in counting etc., I plan to
> complete the release tasks:
>
> * Copy the m2 artifacts and the metadata files over to the m2-rsync repo
> * Copy
attribution in the NOTICE.txt - at a minimum I
think you need to review whether its OK to re-distribute these since
users will be using that software if they look at the Cobertura
documentation. IMO it would be better if they were excluded from the
distros altogether.
Niall
On 1/4/07, Niall Pemberton
A couple of nitpicks
1) I ran the rat tool on the framework distro, after removing the docs
directory (which highlighted a load of generated files) there were a
few missing license headers. Patch available here:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-384
Also there are two Sun licensed f
On 12/14/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 14, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> As the shale-tiles module has no dependency on the rest of shale and
> can be used in a vanilla JSF environment wouldn't it make more sense
> to move this to the propo
On 12/14/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> One thing that might affect Greg's enthusiasm :-) I'd like to see
> us do is
> try to position for a GA release of everything except shale-tiles,
> either by
> marking it with a separat
The "Aquiring Shale" section on the building page points to the Struts
download page (and mentions the struts subversion repository) for
checking out the source:
http://shale.apache.org/building.html
Niall
On 11/13/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/13/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Niall ... that was it exactly! The problem still exists with
> Digester 1.7, but is fixed with the latest nightly build of DIgester.
It's in the m1 snapshot repo. We can add
On 11/13/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/13/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/13/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/13/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 11/13/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/9/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/8/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > 1) Shale doesn't have a link on the main Apache site.
>
>
I'm trying to follow the directions for updating the main webs
On 7/9/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 3:03 PM
Subject: Links reminders
> 1) Shale doesn't have a link on the main Apache site.
I'm
1) Shale doesn't have a link on the main Apache site.
2) The wiki link on the Shale site is still pointing to the Struts wiki
Niall
On 7/7/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/7/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That reminds me that we have a wiki to start building ...
I was wondering last night if it will be possible to move files from
one wiki to another, or if we'll have to copy-paste-delete. Do
22 matches
Mail list logo
