> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin McDonald [mailto:ga...@16degrees.com.au]
> Sent: Thursday, 7 July 2011 7:00 AM
> To: dev@shindig.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Use of CI Systems at the ASF
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Paul Lindner [mailto:lind...@inuus.com]
> > Sent: We
Thanks for making a first pass Paul. Is this the tool your referring
to?
http://code.google.com/p/closure-linter/source/browse/trunk/closure_linter/gjslint.py?r=2
On 2011/07/07 16:03:37, Paul Lindner wrote:
First pass -- didn't look at tests or examples closely.
Please run the js code throug
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1029/#review994
---
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shindig/trunk/java/server/src/main/jav
Yes that's correct Henry. We just wanted to have the updates spec changes
there incase anyone wanted to see the APIs in the spec as well.
-Ryan
Email: rjbax...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 978-899-3041
developerWorks Profile
From: Henry Saputra
To: dev@shindig.apache.org,
Date: 07/07/2011 01:
Ryan,
The final patch set review for
Action+Selection Features: http://codereview.appspot.com/4645056/
is actually contain change for the OpenSocial spec changes instead of Shindig.
Should we review the patch set2?
- Henry
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Ryan J Baxter wrote:
> Shindig Committ
Mike, if there are no other questions or concerns here, can you commit
this?
Thanks,
-Stanton
From: Michael Hermanto
To: Ryan Baxter ,
Cc: johnfa...@gmail.com, shindig , Stanton
Sievers/Westford/IBM@Lotus
Date: 07/06/2011 13:47
Subject:Re: Review Request: Common Containe
fixed a typo in the feature code.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4631090/
without tabs this time.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4631090/
First pass -- didn't look at tests or examples closely.
Please run the js code through gjslint, that will catch most of the
issues I pointed out.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4641058/diff/1/content/samplecontainer/examples/commoncontainer/cconviews.js
File content/samplecontainer/examples/comm
The default http fetcher is based on apache httpclient 4.x.
There's some talk of this over here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2703161/apache-httpclient-4-0-ignore-ssl-certificate-errors
However I recommend that you do NOT do this as it could expose you to man in
the middle attacks. Keytoo
Doug did you try using gadgets.makeRequest? Did you have the same
problem?
-Ryan
Email: rjbax...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 978-899-3041
developerWorks Profile
From: "Davies,Douglas"
To: ,
Date: 07/07/2011 01:11 AM
Subject:Re: Handling Certificates
We had the same situation. The
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1029/
---
Review request for shindig, Ryan Baxter and Agustin Casiva.
Summary
---
Alt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1029/
---
(Updated 2011-07-07 08:45:04.703624)
Review request for shindig, Ryan Baxter and
Done.
Also I came up with a another patch which would be much appropriate.I had
use that in the review.
Link to the review : https://reviews.apache.org/r/1029/
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Ryan J Baxter wrote:
> Could you please create a code review request using the Apache code review
> to
14 matches
Mail list logo
