SXSW: Vote for OpenSocial

2011-09-02 Thread Mark W.
Keep the revolution going Vote for the OpenSocial sessions at SXSW The proposals that we have available are: - *Distributed Web Frameworks: The Future of Social* Link: http://panelpicker.sxsw.com/ideas/view/10692 - *Revolution! Open Apps Will Change the Enterprise* Link: ht

Re: Gadget To Gadget RPC

2011-09-02 Thread John Hjelmstad
Top is whatever top is :) That is to say, it's typically the container page but it's also possible that the container is itself IFRAMEd. --j On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Ryan J Baxter wrote: > Thanks for the info John. If I am understanding you correctly, "top" > would be the container pag

Re: Review Request: Declared actions get fired in the first instance of the gadget, ignoring any specified view target in the declaration

2011-09-02 Thread Ryan Baxter
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1682/#review1734 --- Ship it! Committed revision 1164527. Please close the review and the

Re: Review Request: Declared actions get fired in the first instance of the gadget, ignoring any specified view target in the declaration

2011-09-02 Thread Dan Dumont
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1682/ --- (Updated 2011-09-02 13:19:47.959759) Review request for shindig, Ryan Baxter, Ma

Re: Gadget To Gadget RPC

2011-09-02 Thread Ryan J Baxter
Thanks for the info John. If I am understanding you correctly, "top" would be the container page? -Ryan Email: rjbax...@us.ibm.com Phone: 978-899-3041 developerWorks Profile From: John Hjelmstad To: dev@shindig.apache.org, Date: 09/01/2011 04:11 PM Subject:Re: Gadget To Gad

Re: Replacing The Gadget Blacklist Functionality

2011-09-02 Thread Ryan J Baxter
Henry, I was actually thinking of having it be it's own file, with it's own guice module. I think this provides the most flexibility to the implementer. I know for our use case it would be simpler for us to just replace a guice module as this administration information is stored separately fr

Re: Review Request: Declared actions get fired in the first instance of the gadget, ignoring any specified view target in the declaration

2011-09-02 Thread Ryan Baxter
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1682/#review1733 --- Dan when I apply your patch the actions in the reference implementatio