---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5600/#review8765
---
Ship it!
Committed revision 1355574. Thanks Chris.
Please close this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5600/#review8756
---
Ship it!
Better fix. Like!
+1
- Henry Saputra
On June 29, 2012, 3
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3908/#review8754
---
To make it easier to review, please format the patch following the Apa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5589/#review8753
---
Ship it!
Committed revision 1355476. Please close this review.
- St
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5592/#review8752
---
Ship it!
Committed revision 1355472. Please close this review.
- St
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5497/#review8751
---
Ship it!
Committed revision 1355468. Please close the review.
- Sta
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5592/
---
(Updated June 29, 2012, 1:12 p.m.)
Review request for shindig, Stanton Sievers a
> On March 1, 2012, 7:04 p.m., Henry Saputra wrote:
> > I think the scenario is not what the rpc mechanism intend to do. The
> > communication between container and gadgets happen between one parent
> > window and a child window via iframe.
>
> Yao Zhang wrote:
> Hi Henry,
> There is t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3908/#review8743
---
Can you look at adding some JUnits around this functionality? I'm alw
