---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1211/#review1926
---
Ship it!
Committed revision 1171551.
- Ryan
On 2011-08-12 14:44:17
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1211/#review1910
---
Ship it!
I'm inclined to add this. It's really hard to test this sin
> On 2011-09-14 22:16:56, Ryan Baxter wrote:
> > LGTM Dan. My one concern is that there is existing code that depends on
> > the old behavior. Are there any unit tests around this code? Can you
> > think of any way to figure out if there is any code that depends on the old
> > behavior? Ju
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1211/#review1898
---
LGTM Dan. My one concern is that there is existing code that depends
> On 2011-08-08 17:41:59, Dan Dumont wrote:
> > Bump for reviewers.
I think this one slipped through the cracks. Can I trouble some of you to
review this change?
- Dan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1211/
---
(Updated 2011-08-12 14:44:17.063813)
Review request for shindig.
Summary
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1211/#review1321
---
Bump for reviewers.
- Dan
On 2011-07-27 21:57:05, Dan Dumont wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/1211/
---
Review request for shindig.
Summary
---
While debugging using a container c
