---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2052/#review2596
---
Ship it!
Committed revision 1183460.
- Ryan
On 2011-10-14 18:01:40
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2052/
---
(Updated 2011-10-14 18:01:40.220430)
Review request for shindig, Paul Lindner, H
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2052/#review2587
---
/trunk/content/samplecontainer/examples/conservcontainer/index.html
<
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2052/
---
(Updated 2011-10-12 20:54:19.017987)
Review request for shindig, Paul Lindner, H
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2052/
---
(Updated 2011-09-28 14:42:55.071479)
Review request for shindig, Paul Lindner, H
Thanks, Henry. SHINDIG-1627 seems to be the right issue for the feature Dan
or I plan to work on when we find time.
Ryan,
I just would like to fix the issue before the other patch is available so we
can have some buffer to wait for the the other patch ( it may take some time
to do that ).
Also th
> On 2011-09-27 13:05:14, Dan Dumont wrote:
> > There's another fix to this problem that addresses the issue expressed by
> > Doug Davies in the dev list.
> > instead of forcing people to register an API_PATH for the common container,
> > we should by default NOT register an api path if it is n
We can use Jira SHINDIG-1627 to track this patch.
- Henry
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:42 AM, li xu wrote:
>
>
>> On 2011-09-27 13:05:14, Dan Dumont wrote:
>> > There's another fix to this problem that addresses the issue expressed by
>> > Doug Davies in the dev list.
>> > instead of forcing peopl
> On 2011-09-27 13:05:14, Dan Dumont wrote:
> > There's another fix to this problem that addresses the issue expressed by
> > Doug Davies in the dev list.
> > instead of forcing people to register an API_PATH for the common container,
> > we should by default NOT register an api path if it is n
> On 2011-09-27 13:05:14, Dan Dumont wrote:
> > There's another fix to this problem that addresses the issue expressed by
> > Doug Davies in the dev list.
> > instead of forcing people to register an API_PATH for the common container,
> > we should by default NOT register an api path if it is n
> On 2011-09-27 13:05:14, Dan Dumont wrote:
> > There's another fix to this problem that addresses the issue expressed by
> > Doug Davies in the dev list.
> > instead of forcing people to register an API_PATH for the common container,
> > we should by default NOT register an api path if it is n
> On 2011-09-27 13:05:14, Dan Dumont wrote:
> > There's another fix to this problem that addresses the issue expressed by
> > Doug Davies in the dev list.
> > instead of forcing people to register an API_PATH for the common container,
> > we should by default NOT register an api path if it is n
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2052/#review2086
---
There's another fix to this problem that addresses the issue expressed
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2052/
---
Review request for shindig, Paul Lindner, Henry Saputra, and Ryan Baxter.
Summar
14 matches
Mail list logo
