Remove out of date developer list from parent pom
-
Key: SLING-1120
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1120
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Task
Components: General
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758611#action_12758611
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-1120:
-
It is also important to just one single
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758611#action_12758611
]
Carsten Ziegeler edited comment on SLING-1120 at 9/22/09 11:47 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler resolved SLING-1117.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Updated to latest maven bundle plugin
Update to latest plugin
+1
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:
Please vote to approve this release:
+1
--
Vidar S. Ramdal vi...@idium.no - http://www.idium.no
Sommerrogata 13-15, N-0255 Oslo, Norway
+ 47 22 00 84 00 / +47 21 531941, ext 2070
+1
best regards
mike
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:27 AM
To: dev@sling.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Sling Parent POM 7
Hi,
We solved 3 issues in this release:
Ok, it seems that this issue is rather a controversial one.
The question remains if we should apply it or not. As far as I could
follow the discussion, Felix and Ian are not happy with the patch while
Alex claims that it doesn't do any harm.
So I think, if you two, Felix and Ian, could shortly
On 23 Sep 2009, at 09:32, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:01 AM, paksegu paks...@yahoo.com wrote:
..Is the Sakai Project 100% Apache Sling?
Yes, 100% Sling
+ some extension bundles to cover Higher Ed Use cases and UI specifics.
We are currently building form
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carsten Ziegeler resolved SLING-447.
Resolution: Fixed
Added two new methods to fire a job n times in Revision: 818017
On 23 Sep 2009, at 09:49, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Ok, it seems that this issue is rather a controversial one.
The question remains if we should apply it or not. As far as I could
follow the discussion, Felix and Ian are not happy with the patch
while
Alex claims that it doesn't do any
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:40, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
IMHO this comes down to if you believe that the resolution of the resource
should be based on parsing the URI path alone, or should be informed by the
existence of a real resource in the content system.
At the moment most
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Alexander Klimetschek
aklim...@day.com wrote:
For c2) this means there cannot be a resource at the virtual
resource path, or any other part of the rest the full URI.
Just to check if I understand correctly:
If you have an existing resource /content/readme.doc,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 13:08, Vidar Ramdal vi...@idium.no wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Alexander Klimetschek
aklim...@day.com wrote:
For c2) this means there cannot be a resource at the virtual
resource path, or any other part of the rest the full URI.
Just to check if I
Hi,
Speaking up as I am kind of opposed to this patch, too ;-)
Just to clarify: This patch modifies the NonExistingResource constructor
such that it reads:
public NonExistingResource(ResourceResolver resourceResolver,
String resourceURI) {
super(resourceResolver,
Hi Christoph,
Christoph Papke schrieb:
Hi folks,
we're having a strange problem with the sling.include-method in our
esp-templates.
At the moment we're trying to develop a flexible content model for a
newspaper company.
Here is a short extract of our repository structure:
And here [1] is the patch for setting the metadata in the
JcrResourceResolver2 instead of the NonExistingResource constructor,
where it probably does not belong anyway.
Regards
Felix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758699#action_12758699
]
Felix Meschberger edited comment on SLING-864 at 9/23/09 6:43 AM:
JcrNodeResource should better ignore jcr:lastModified if that's not a long
--
Key: SLING-1122
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1122
Project: Sling
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bertrand Delacretaz resolved SLING-1122.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: JCR Resource 2.0.6
Implemented in revision
// iterate over brick groups and include them
brickGroups = wall.getBrickGroups();
for (i = 0; i brickGroups.size(); i++) {
sling.include(brickGroups.get(i).getPath());
}
It is OT but in such a situation one probably could/should use a for-each loop
instead:
for (BrickGroup brickGroup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12758766#action_12758766
]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-1122:
--
Actually, the jcr:lastModified
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 15:43, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com wrote:
And here [1] is the patch for setting the metadata in the
JcrResourceResolver2 instead of the NonExistingResource constructor,
where it probably does not belong anyway.
ACK for changing it. This keeps the
Hi,
I tried running curl -X
MKCOL http://admin:ad...@localhost:/dav/default/apps against
launchpad installed inside Glassfish V3. The server came back with a 405
error. I would love to recommend Sling for a project I am engaged in but
their production env does not allow maven nor jetty,
I'm getting a SecurityException [1] when trying to start up the Sling JVM
after a fresh build of trunk:
Does anyone know what could be happening here? I followed instructions at
http://sling.apache.org/site/getting-and-building-sling.html
Thanks,
Branden
[1]
Oh... the issue looks like it should have been fixed [1].. I just bumped into
it in trunk.
Is this a regression?
[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-830
-Branden Visser bran...@uwindsor.ca wrote: -
To: dev@sling.apache.org
From: Branden Visser bran...@uwindsor.ca
Date:
26 matches
Mail list logo
