Re: Compatibility of Sling with Oak 1.2

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Konrad Windszus wrote: >> On 16 Sep 2015, at 11:41, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> ...I'm not sure what to suggest...would using older released versions of >> the affected Sling modules work for you?.. > Unfortunately not as I need the fix for > https://issues.a

Re: Compatibility of Sling with Oak 1.2

Unfortunately not as I need the fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4974 (JCR Resource 2.5.6). But the compatibility to Oak 1.2 was removed with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4820

Re: Compatibility of Sling with Oak 1.2

Hi, On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Konrad Windszus wrote: > ...In the case of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4820 > there is no simple solution to support both Oak 1.2 and 1.3 I'm not sure what to suggest...would using older released versions of the affected Sling modules wor

Re: Compatibility of Sling with Oak 1.2

In the case of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-4820 there is no simple solution to support both Oak 1.2 and 1.3. Since Oak incremented the major version of the package (although at first glance the used interfaces from https://githu

Re: Compatibility of Sling with Oak 1.2

Hi, On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Konrad Windszus wrote: > ...What is the policy of supporting Oak 1.2 in Sling?... I don't think we have a defined policy so far - in general I like our tests to run against the latest Oak to stay on top of things, but you're right that it makes sense to also

Compatibility of Sling with Oak 1.2

I just ran into the problem that the package version of org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/observation changed from 1.0 (in Oak prior 1.3) to 2.0 (since Oak 1.3). This is a major version change not compatible with any version ranges being generated by the maven-bundle-plugin. Due to this fact t