On 8 Oct 2009, at 21:06, Felix Meschberger wrote:
which ? the ones with servlet path collisions ?
yes, servlet path collision, I need to check that de-registration
really
works.
*but*
with 2 servlets registered to the same path I haven't worked out the
order in which they should be used,
Hi,
Ian Boston schrieb:
>
> On 8 Oct 2009, at 11:35, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ian Boston schrieb:
>>> Hi,
>>> While looking at making it possible to bind more than one
>>> ResourceProvider to a URL see [1], I noticed that the
>>> ResourceProviderEntry appeared to be a very active
On 8 Oct 2009, at 11:35, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Ian Boston schrieb:
Hi,
While looking at making it possible to bind more than one
ResourceProvider to a URL see [1], I noticed that the
ResourceProviderEntry appeared to be a very active area of code
with a
lot of recursion, especially
Hi,
Ian Boston schrieb:
> Hi,
> While looking at making it possible to bind more than one
> ResourceProvider to a URL see [1], I noticed that the
> ResourceProviderEntry appeared to be a very active area of code with a
> lot of recursion, especially when you actually start to deploy a
> reasonabl
Hi,
While looking at making it possible to bind more than one
ResourceProvider to a URL see [1], I noticed that the
ResourceProviderEntry appeared to be a very active area of code with a
lot of recursion, especially when you actually start to deploy a
reasonable number of servlets. This l
