Yes, you are correct. It doesn’t really work. Depending on the distributed
mode you are running in, it may still publish the cores as down, in one of
the modes it sends a down node cmd to the Overseer which should do it based
on what cores are in the cluster state. In that case it should still
Sounds great, looking forward to the zookeeper quorum experiments! Sooner
we get that to work, the closer we get to axing the standalone mode. All
the best..
On Sat, 7 Oct, 2023, 1:19 am Eric Pugh,
wrote:
> Folks headed to Halifax…. Jason and I have talked about hacking together
> on Solr
> branch_9x not being cleaned before the tests are run?
That'd be my guess as well. 'CoresApi.java' is a SolrJ class that's
being generated from our v2 "OpenAPI Spec" (OAS). I merged a PR a few
days ago that adds the install-core-data API to our OAS (which causes
us to generate code for it in
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:30:08.938639]
I also built the docker image and used it to run the Solr Operator
integration tests (using the unreleased main branch, which will soon be
v0.8.0).
This tests the prometheus exporter, replica placement, TLS, mTLS, backups,
and more.
> $ make e2e-tests
Hi Vincent,
I have seen that behavior, node gets re provisioned, replica on that node
is back up live and zk starts routing traffic, however the response time
from that replica is really high for a short period.
Worked around it by adding some hundreds of warming queries which puts the
replica
Folks headed to Halifax…. Jason and I have talked about hacking together on
Solr during the conference. Well, Good News! I’ve got us a room, thanks to
Brian Proffitt's help, to use on Sunday (the day after the Search Track). When
you check the conference schedule you should see it show
At least the last few are failing with:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/5616/console
```
> Task :solr:solrj:compileJava
/tmp/src/solr/solr/solrj/build/generated/src/main/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/request/CoresApi.java:20:
error: cannot find symbol
import
For PRs crave might be doing ok, but branch_9x check builds are all
failing for a while now?
https://lists.apache.org/list?bui...@solr.apache.org:lte=1y:%22rsync%20error:%20some%20files/attrs%20were%20not%20transferred%22
Kevin Risden
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 3:38 PM Eric Pugh
wrote:
> Agreed
Agreed on the branch merging. It’s been great to have it running the full set
of tests!
> On Oct 5, 2023, at 10:58 PM, David Smiley wrote:
>
> I believe the Crave issues with branch merging seem to have been fixed. If
> someone sees otherwise, please let me know.
>
> And boy Crave is
