Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

Hey everyone, forgot to send out the Release Notes page earlier. I added what I thought should be there just now, but will wait for a little bit in case anyone wants to add anything: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote9_2_0 - Houston On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 3:33 PM

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

Thanks for the reminder Jan, it is now merged and backported! - Houston On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 6:51 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > Remember to merge https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1436 > > I can do it if you wish but it ties in with other changes syncing I guess. > > Jan Høydahl > > > 18. mar.

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

Remember to merge https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1436 I can do it if you wish but it ties in with other changes syncing I guess. Jan Høydahl > 18. mar. 2023 kl. 18:39 skrev Shawn Heisey : > > On 3/15/23 08:58, Houston Putman wrote: >> - SOLR-9168

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

On 3/15/23 08:58, Houston Putman wrote: - SOLR-9168 : It looks like this has a patch, that was +1'ed by Kevin, but it hasn't had movement since October. - SOLR-8803 (assigned to Shawn): This has

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

So the documented blockers are almost resolved, thanks Shawn! Eric decided, for the best, that SOLR-10466 should wait for Solr 9.3. I'm probably planning on cutting a release later today Alessandro, but if there is a re-spin, I'd be happy to include SOLR-16674. (Or if y'all think it's ready to

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

I checked internally with my colleagues and it seems that the only issue that is near the merge point is this one: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1435 Definitely nice to have (also to show progress in the neural search side of things) but I wouldn't say it's a blocker. I assume it will be

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

I am super close on SOLR-10466, barring any issues being raised on review. Going to keep pushing this afternoon to get it to done. Only thirteen more uses of the deprecated method in the test code, and honestly, since we aren’t deleting this method in 9.2, if I don’t get the remaining test

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

Hey everyone, Trying to get organized around the release. From my point of view, this is the state of unfinished work: Looking at the Solr 9.2 blockers ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SOLR/versions/12352353), we currently have two: - SOLR-9168

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

Hey everyone, I'm planning on cutting the branch today, and seeing what our blockers look like. Once again, please ensure the JIRAs that must make it into 9.2 have the blocker attribute added. Otherwise I'm going to move forward in a few days, unless there are issues that we see arise. -

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

I have some issues my team is working on, and we would potentially love to see them in 9.2 . But I don't want to block anything and I suspect they'll get merged by the end of this week. Any estimation for the branch cut? So we may potentially include them. Cheers --

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

I'll cut the branch in a few days, so go for it and merge tomorrow. Please do add 9.2 as the Fix Version so that we can track this correctly. - Houston On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:06 PM Andy Webb wrote: > hi Houston, > > I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in progress - >

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

hi Houston, I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in progress - would like that to go into 9.2 if possible, but it's not critical. I'm away so won't be in a position to merge that until this time tomorrow at the earliest. It'll also be my first commit, and I want to make sure

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

Hi Houston, We're actively working on SOLR-16653. Since it is a bug fix, hoping it won't delay the release. +1 to branch cutting. Regards, Ishan On Tue, 7 Mar, 2023, 8:48 pm Houston Putman, wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How are we >

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

Hey everyone, I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How are we doing with regards to blockers right now? So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not completed. Do we have updates for these items? - SOLR-16653

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step + throw a http 400 error. Jan Høydahl > 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev : > > Hello, colleagues! > How can we triage https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681 > Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

Hello, colleagues! How can we triage https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681 Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0? I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a known bug/limitation? On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman wrote: > Hey

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

I am hoping to wrap SOLR-8975 in time for 9.2. The last remaining issue is around what to do with the CloudSolrClient's setDefaultCollection, see SOLR-10466. Would love to get some consensus on SOLR-10466 and try and get those changes done this week. On 2023/02/18 23:26:56 Jan Høydahl

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

+1, lots of goodies there Jan Høydahl > 17. feb. 2023 kl. 19:05 skrev Houston Putman : > > Hey everyone, > > It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of great > things to show off in 9.2: > > - Jetty 10 > - JAX-RS > - Lucene 9.5 > > I volunteer to do the release

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

Thanks Houston! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 1:05 PM Houston Putman wrote: > Hey everyone, > > It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of great > things to show off in 9.2: > > -

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

Wow, old JIRA! But fine by me. As long as you think it can make it in the next two weeks. To be clear, I'm not cutting the branch yet, so feel free to set blockers and make commits. I'll start the process on March 6 and we can see where we are then. - Houston On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 3:19 PM

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

Thanks, Houston. Can I nominate https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1260 as a blocker for 9.2? On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:49 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, thanks for volunteering. > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:37 PM Houston Putman > wrote: > > > Hey

Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

+1, thanks for volunteering. On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:37 PM Houston Putman wrote: > Hey everyone, > > It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of great > things to show off in 9.2: > > - Jetty 10 > - JAX-RS > - Lucene 9.5 > > I volunteer to do the release starting in

[DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release

Hey everyone, It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of great things to show off in 9.2: - Jetty 10 - JAX-RS - Lucene 9.5 I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March 6th, unless anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves. - Houston