+1, agree with Mark. Let's not rush.
On Thu, 31 Mar, 2022, 11:38 pm Mark Miller, wrote:
> Just going to throw this out there, but I don’t think you have to know
> much of anything about the likely quality and impact of changes from Lucene
> 9.1 to say that raising the king dependency for a softw
Just going to throw this out there, but I don’t think you have to know much
of anything about the likely quality and impact of changes from Lucene 9.1
to say that raising the king dependency for a software project by a full
dot release is def not “respin and another quick round of smokes material”
Anshum and I are both seeing the smoke tester leak GPG agents, filed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16132 for it.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 9:06 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure, I'll take a stab at it. But, no need to wait for me to get to it, I
> migh
Sure, I'll take a stab at it. But, no need to wait for me to get to it, I
might be able to do this in 1-2 days.
Even if it doesn't make it to Solr 9.0, we can use Lucene 9.1 for a Solr
9.1 for sure :-)
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 7:13 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> You make it seem dead smiple and risk fre
You make it seem dead smiple and risk free, but there are a ton of changes that
may trigger Solr changes, with another round of testing and stabilization. But
hey, won't stop you from whipping up a JIRA and a PR, and then the PR review
along with passing tests can shed more light on the benefit,
https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_1_0/changes/Changes.html#v9.1.0.optimizations
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 6:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can you tell the benefit, cost, risk and ETA for a Lucene 9.1 upgrade?
> I'm not able to judge before I know.
>
> I can see l
> Can you tell the benefit, cost, risk and ETA for a Lucene 9.1 upgrade?
I'm not able to judge before I know.
I can see lots of performance optimizations in Lucene 9.1, and can't see
any significant risk (judging by changelog).
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 6:34 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Can you tell t
Can you tell the benefit, cost, risk and ETA for a Lucene 9.1 upgrade? I'm not
able to judge before I know.
Yea, RC2 will likely fail due to SQL. But it is valuable for people to continue
testing RC2 and potentially find other bugs, so we avoid too many RCs... So
I'll leave the vote open a bit
If this vote is going to fail, can we re-spin based on Lucene 9.1?
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:55 PM Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Here is the jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16131.
>
> My official vote for the RC:
>
> -1
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Thu,
Here is the jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16131.
My official vote for the RC:
-1
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 4:15 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Joel,
>
> I could reproduce the error
> > Failed to load JDBC driver for
> 'org.apache.solr.ha
Joel,
I could reproduce the error
> Failed to load JDBC driver for 'org.apache.solr.handler.sql.CalciteSolrDriver'
And I see that JDBCStream uses a plain Class.forName(driverClassName); to fail
early if the driver is wrong.
The sql module is loaded:
> o.a.s.c.NodeConfig Added module sql.
> lib
Anshum, can you provide details on your setup (OS, JVM) as well as the exact
test failure log? From your earlier mail it looked like your install used a
class from $HOME/.m2/ which is not in security manager allow-list. Wonder if it
is the same happening this time?
Jan
> 30. mar. 2022 kl. 23:1
I tried adding the module in the solr.in.sh and it can't find the
SQLHandler after starting up. So the sql module appears to not be working.
"error":{
"metadata":[
"error-class","org.apache.solr.common.SolrException",
"root-error-class","java.lang.ClassNotFoundException"],
"msg
I tried loading the sql module but ran into this error when running a sql
query:
Failed to load JDBC driver for
'org.apache.solr.handler.sql.CalciteSolrDriver'
I loaded the module using system prop from startup command line:
bin/solr start -c -Dsolr.modules=sql
Joel Bernstein
http://joelso
I found a minor glitch.
In solr-exporter, the default config solr-exporter-config.xml still uses
solr_metrics_core_replication_master as key for the
REPLICATION./replication.isLeader metric.
In 8.x the metrics was named REPLICATION./replication.isMaster and
REPLICATION./replication.isSlave, bu
+1
SUCCESS! [1:26:27.731406]
I also spent some time working with artifacts, creating collections,
loading data, querying, streaming expressions. All looked good.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 6:47 PM Houston Putman wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [0
+1 (binding)
SUCCESS! [0:50:48.458378]
I also tried building a custom image via the TGZ, and building the official
image.
Custom image built via:
docker build --file /solr-9.0.0/docker/Dockerfile
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.0.0-RC2-rev-e7a6447013008a70a4f40fcfd793fe3e2dcf3
I've run into the same issue w/ failing tests (:solr:solrj:testAdminUI and
solr:modules:hdfs:) due to the security manager. Is anyone else also seeing
this?
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 11:53 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Solr 9.0.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloade
Please vote for release candidate 2 for Solr 9.0.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.0.0-RC2-rev-e7a6447013008a70a4f40fcfd793fe3e2dcf37c2
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.
19 matches
Mail list logo
