gt; > It fails. Doesn't the "-Duse.perreplica=false" tell it to not use
> > PRS?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Houston
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 5:25 AM Noble Paul >
> > wrote:
> &g
> > > >
> > > > > - Houston
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 5:25 AM Noble Paul
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > What I have noticed is that CloudAuthStreamTest fails in PRS
&
RS mode. So,
> > > > > it passes all the time without PRS.
> > > > >
> > > > > It needs to be fixed anyway, but I'm disabling the PRS mode for that
> > > test
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 4:28 AM Ch
ton
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 3:58 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> > LONDON) <
> > > > > cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > If it's not too late I'd like to nomin
t; >
> > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 4:28 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> > > LONDON) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks! Done.
> > > >
> > > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/25/24 14:42:10 UTCTo:
> > > dev@so
; On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 4:28 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> > LONDON) wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks! Done.
> > >
> > > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/25/24 14:42:10 UTCTo:
> > dev@solr.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Bugfix release Lucene/So
ing the PRS mode for that test
>
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 4:28 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> LONDON) wrote:
> >
> > Thanks! Done.
> >
> > From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/25/24 14:42:10 UTCTo:
> dev@solr.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Bugfix release Lu
t;
> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/25/24 14:42:10 UTCTo: dev@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.3
>
> Not too late, please continue with the back port Christine’
>
> - Houston
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 3:58 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG
Thanks! Done.
From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/25/24 14:42:10 UTCTo: dev@solr.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.3
Not too late, please continue with the back port Christine’
- Houston
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 3:58 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
cpoe
Noble is looking into that issue. I have time tomorrow (public holiday
tomorrow), planning to taking a look at it.
On Wed, 24 Jan, 2024, 2:07 am Houston Putman, wrote:
> Right now we are blocked on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16580,
> which introduced failures that pop up roughl
SOLR-17120 via
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2683 for being in the 8.11.3
> release too.
>
> - Christine
>
> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 01/25/24 00:20:16 UTCTo:
> dev@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.3
>
> > But the &qu
Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.11.3
> But the "CloudAuthStreamTest" test fails 100% of the time with the
Yes.Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'm looking into it and
trying to fix that
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 9:02 AM Houston Putman wrote:
>
> I'm unsure abou
> But the "CloudAuthStreamTest" test fails 100% of the time with the
Yes.Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'm looking into it and
trying to fix that
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 9:02 AM Houston Putman wrote:
>
> I'm unsure about the hdfs issues for now..
>
> But the "CloudAuthStreamTest" test
I'm unsure about the hdfs issues for now..
But the "CloudAuthStreamTest" test fails 100% of the time with the
"F8952559841D5C83" seed for me. And it's not a test issue, its an actual
bug.
I've been focusing my efforts here, but it fails both with PRS enabled and
disabled. So the patch went beyond
I ran the solr/core tests few times, and here are the results:
1)
[junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 7A919DB0B1698A5]:
[junit4] - org.apache.solr.search.TestRecoveryHdfs (suite) [junit4]
2)
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 4 minutes 31 seconds
3)
[junit4] Tests with failures [seed: E174107AF6819
Looking at it, ASAP.
On Wed, 24 Jan, 2024, 2:07 am Houston Putman, wrote:
> Right now we are blocked on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16580,
> which introduced failures that pop up roughly 50% of the time or so.
>
> We can't really proceed until the issue is fixed, as I don't thin
Right now we are blocked on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16580,
which introduced failures that pop up roughly 50% of the time or so.
We can't really proceed until the issue is fixed, as I don't think it's
necessarily a test issue.
- Houston
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 10:10 PM Ishan Ch
+1
On Sun, 21 Jan, 2024, 8:47 am Houston Putman, wrote:
> Now that 9.4 is out, we should plan this for next week. Ill try to get
> stuff ready for a monday RC, if no one objects.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:58 PM Houston Putman
> wrote:
>
> > Since the 9.4.1 release candidate i
Now that 9.4 is out, we should plan this for next week. Ill try to get
stuff ready for a monday RC, if no one objects.
- Houston
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:58 PM Houston Putman
wrote:
> Since the 9.4.1 release candidate is out, I'm fine waiting for it to
> finish. But let's try to get 8.11.3 ou
Since the 9.4.1 release candidate is out, I'm fine waiting for it to
finish. But let's try to get 8.11.3 out very soon afterwards.
Also, as I stated on the other thread, didn't mean to tread on your toes
here. If you want to continue with the release, please do!
- Houston
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at
Shouldn't we wait for the 9.4.1 to go out first? That's what I was holding
out on.
On Sat, 13 Jan, 2024, 12:43 am Houston Putman, wrote:
> NOTICE:
>
> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_11
>
> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>
> * Before c
NOTICE:
I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_11
Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
* Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
* All issues accepted for backportin
22 matches
Mail list logo
