Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 4. Listed in Catherine Hampton's SpamBouncer domain list = almost
> certainly spam.
>
> 5. Domain is listed in ROKSO = definitely spam
I should note these are also good ways to get lists of blacklistable
URLs.
> 6. Domain is listed in Yah
By foot-shooting, I mean sacrificing our corpus by extracting whitelist
entries from it. (I don't want us to hit a sacrifice fly when we have
two outs and a man on first.)
There are three basic methods for improving SURBL:
1. adding good entries to the whitelist
2. removing good (and perhaps
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 03:34:12PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> > BTW, note that plugins *should* be able to push their own entries
> > onto the $conf->{registered_commands} list. That is, in my opinion,
> > much cleaner th
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3865
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
Target Milestone|Future
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 03:34:12PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> BTW, note that plugins *should* be able to push their own entries
> onto the $conf->{registered_commands} list. That is, in my opinion,
> much cleaner than the current parse_config() API, and may be worthwhile
> as a way for future p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
BTW, note that plugins *should* be able to push their own entries
onto the $conf->{registered_commands} list. That is, in my opinion,
much cleaner than the current parse_config() API, and may be worthwhile
as a way for future plugins to do configura
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3869
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.1.0
--- You are receivin
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3869
Summary: plugins have no standard way to report parsing error
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3868
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.1.0
--- Additional Comment
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3868
Summary: add "use warnings;" to code base
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3866
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3843
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3866
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Target Milestone|Fut
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3866
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 14:30 ---
Subject: Re: Empty rewrite_header doesn't remove rewrite_header setting
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:12:43AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The following line s
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3843
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 14:28 ---
Subject: Re: Hashcash plugin is failing
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 02:12:08PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Argument "" isn't numeric in addition (+)
> at /usr
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 14:23 ---
Subject: Re: [review] Sys::Hostname::Long renames host to --fqdn when run as
root
$ perl -e 'print "$^O\n"'
solaris
$ uname -rs
SunOS 5.9
--- You are r
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3843
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 14:12 ---
Using the newest hashcash ver 1.12 the problem still presents:
Argument "" isn't numeric in addition (+)
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plug
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 13:59 ---
quick note. Alessandro uses -A flags on spamd, and -d flag on spamc just like i
do. dunno if that plays any importance or not.
>> Can someone experiencing this
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3839
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 13:46 ---
ok, now *THAT* works a lot better ;)
after spamd startup:
top -b -n1 | grep perl
11842 root 9 0 4816 444 444 S 0.0 0.0 0:01 perl
2666 jm
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3867
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3605
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3867
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 13:29 ---
3rd dupe of bug 3605 - that is what 'query' is for ppl.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3839
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 13:28 ---
sigh...
The more I look into this, the less and less it appears to be an issue.
This script:
#!/usr/bin/perl
# original at http://www.fedoraforum.org/for
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3867
Summary: SpamAssassin does not put a header if no header to start
with
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
S
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 12:10 ---
Can someone experiencing this issue post the following:
ps auwwx (or -ef) output
strace the spamd pids
lsof the spamd pids
strace the spamc pids
lsof the spamc pi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > +if (/(?:return-path:? |envelope-(?:sender|from)[ =])(\S+)\b/i) {
> >$envfrom = $1;
> > }
>
> Should we just look for
>
> /\b(?:return-path|envelope-(?:sender|from))[ =:])\
Hello,
I'm updated to SA 3.0 and read in the docs, about a compiling flag for
Multiprocessor Boxes.
But now I can't find where I read it or remember this Flag.
Someone here who knows it?
--
Ciao Marco, registered GNU/Linux-User 313353
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> +if (/(?:return-path:? |envelope-(?:sender|from)[ =])(\S+)\b/i) {
>$envfrom = $1;
> }
Should we just look for
/\b(?:return-path|envelope-(?:sender|from))[ =:])\s*(\S+)\b/i
?
(I assume we remove paired ["'<>] at start and end somewhere later too,
b
"Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (You do need at least {28,29} to make it work.)
Hmm... the rule submission used {28}.
> This one is almost too easy. The Message-ID is always 28 or 29
> uppercase alpha characters ending in either AA or AB, followed by a
> dot, followed by the compl
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 11:09 ---
I'm experiencing the same problem with spamc hanging on my mail server:
bash-2.05b# ps aux | grep spamc
qscand 23346 0.0 0.0 19044 ?S19:40 0
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3855
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3855
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 10:39 ---
Something similar seems to be happening with rewrite_header: I've put
rewrite_header subject [SPAM _SCORE_ (jks)]
in my user_prefs, and another spamc u
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 10:35 ---
could everyone seeing this bug, post their spamd and spamc command line
switches? perhaps it's something to do with -H...
--- You are receiving this mail b
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3866
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 10:12 ---
The following line should be changed:
delete $self->{rewrite_header}->{$hdr};
to:
delete $self->{rewrite_header}->{$hdr} if exists $self->{rewrite_header}->{$hd
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3866
Summary: Empty rewrite_header doesn't remove rewrite_header
setting
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Seve
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3865
Summary: Config option w/o parameter sets value to 0
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 09:46 ---
well, i can only find this happening in 1 location right now, and really the
only difference is this location runs a spamd cluster, and dns round robins the
reques
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 09:20 ---
I was in the FreeNode SpamAssassin IRC chat room and a guy in there told me to
post some of this info.
Apparently, we are experiencing the same issues.
OS: RedH
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3864
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 09:01 ---
Subject: Re: New rule submission - SARE_MULT_RATW_02
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 10:09:40PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> if ($mid =~ m/<[A-Z]{28}\.(.+?)>/) {
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-03 23:31 ---
doesn't dnsbl.t do it too?
also, is $^O "solaris" on solaris? iirc it may be "sunos"...
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assign
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3741
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-03 23:30 ---
I think that sounds like a plan. assuming that the hdr format isn't going to
change isn't working...
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3706
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-03 23:29 ---
could you provide a the log produced by spamd with -D, in its entirety, with 1
message being scanned?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3855
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-03 23:27 ---
copy_config needs to special-case certain entries in Conf.
in 3.1.0, I think my proposed Conf two-layer system may fix it ;)
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3812
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3791
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3830
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
> Looks very interesting. The \1 is a performance-killer, though. This
> really needs to be implemented as an eval rule... something like
>
> sub check_whatever {
> my ($self) = @_;
>
> my $mid = $self->get('MESSAGEID');
> if ($mid =~ m/<[A-Z]{28}\.(.+?)>/) {
> my $from = $self->get('F
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3864
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-03 22:21 ---
> Unless you are willing to consider this a trivial patch I suppose I'll have
> to
> print off a CLA form and fax it in soon...
Given your long-term involvement
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3864
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|New rule submission - |New rule submission -
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3864
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-03 19:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=2418)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2418&action=view)
Rule submission
Rule that seems to catch 3-4% of availa
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3864
Summary: New rule submission - SARE_MULT_RATW_02
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: en
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3741
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-03 19:17 ---
It seems like we have this problem everytime there's a new version out. Anyone
have any problems
with just changing the rule from:
meta FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3830
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-03 19:10 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3812
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-03 19:01 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3791
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-03 18:56 ---
+1
I don't have many Xmail headers, but the patch does parse them better than the
current code. :)
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You ar
55 matches
Mail list logo
