http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3879
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3879
Summary: Compatibility of our software with Spamassassin
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 16:02 ---
check for multiple versions of the spamd script in your path.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watc
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
Summary: use of uninitialized value in spamd version 3.0.0
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Pri
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3801
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3805
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 12:54 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3801
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 12:54 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3771
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.0.1 |Future
--- Additional Commen
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3734
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 12:41 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3805
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 12:39 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2424 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 12:25 ---
> appears to have hung on razor2 :(
okay.. scratch the razor2 comment. i'm not 100% sure since i thought i had 'sub
dbg' changed to include pid on every line and
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 12:06 ---
hrmm... i finally have a dead spamd on a new box. here are the details of what
i found. as you can see, it was using 99% CPU for a long ass time before i
noticed
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3877
Summary: RFE: Creation of "version" number for Plugin API
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Pri
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 11:51 ---
+0.9 -- 'A backwards compatability check could be testing for the existence of
the probsref key, if you really think it is necessary.'
more accurately, that's wh
Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wow, it looks like some of the DMOZ data can't be trusted. Some of those
> domains in this WS blocklist are pure spammers.
DMOZ (and as far as I know, Wikipedia) don't filter URLs based on email
policies of those sites. However, the links *should* ge
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bayes tokenizer method |[review] Bayes tokenizer
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3494
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 11:24 ---
Subject: Re: NO_DNS_FOR_FROM needs major fixing
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:11:51AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have 252 hits in my spamd logs, about 1.2%
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 11:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=2424)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2424&action=view)
Patch File
Here is the proposed patch. It shrinks the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3494
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 11:11 ---
Subject: Re: NO_DNS_FOR_FROM needs major fixing
WORKSFORME
I have 252 hits in my spamd logs, about 1.2% of total email (ham and
spam). All 252 appear to be spa
WORKSFORME
I have 252 hits in my spamd logs, about 1.2% of total email (ham and
spam). All 252 appear to be spam. The rule is more accurate than
ever. :-)
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ http://www.apac
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 11:06 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 11:05 ---
+1 on including in 3.0.1.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Bug 3875: Use of map/grep/sha1 contruct causes large memory bloat, switch to
> simple foreach loop
I'd be +1 on including this in 3.0.1. I think the bloat is bad news.
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin
http://ww
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 10:00 ---
+1
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 09:59 ---
I've applied that patch to an instance of ours that was quitting every day or
two, so we'll see how it handles.
Solaris 9 with Perl 5.8.3 on a V240 in case it he
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bayes tokenizer method uses |[review] Bayes tokenizer
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 09:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=2423)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2423&action=view)
Patch File
Patch against 3.0 branch
--- You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 09:52 ---
Committed to trunk:
Committed revision 53886.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 09:49 ---
(oh, I should point out, that's why plugin hooks use name=>value pairs for
parameters. ;)
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 09:49 ---
I think the massive memory hit is a big enough deal to change this API. it's
not a widely-used plugin API, and the different semantics can be flagged easily
in a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3494
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[review] NO_DNS_FOR_FROM|NO_DNS_FOR_FROM needs major
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 09:25 ---
Subject: Re: Bayes tokenizer method creates space wasting hash
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:48:18AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'd rather we make sure we
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3652
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 08:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=2422)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2422&action=view)
spamd tcp and child timeout patch
see bug 3828 for disc
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 08:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=2421)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2421&action=view)
Adds 2 new timeouts to spamd
this patch will add a tcp
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 07:48 ---
Subject: Re: Bayes tokenizer method creates space wasting hash
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:39:06AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is anyone game for getting th
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876
Summary: Bayes tokenizer method creates space wasting hash
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Pr
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875
Summary: Bayes tokenizer method uses a lot of memory when hashing
raw tokens
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
On Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 7:05:41 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
>>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>And some list counts from those hits:
>>
>>[ws] hits: 1173
>>[ob] hits: 165
>>[jp] hits: 61
>>[sc] hits:8
>>[ab] hits:4
>>[ph] hits:
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 5:58 AM
>To: SURBL Discuss
>Cc: SpamAssassin Developers
>Subject: Possible large whitelist from DMOZ data
>
*snip*
>
>And some list counts from those hits:
>
>[ws] hits: 1173
>[
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3494
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
On Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 6:37:55 AM, Henry Stern wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> You might want to reconsider your use of the entire DMOZ directory.
> There may be some subtrees that you can ignore. Of the 1338 DMOZ false
> positives, how many of them are from the same sections on DMOZ?
> Henry
To be
Hi Jeff,
You might want to reconsider your use of the entire DMOZ directory.
There may be some subtrees that you can ignore. Of the 1338 DMOZ false
positives, how many of them are from the same sections on DMOZ?
Henry
Jeff Chan wrote:
Daniel Quinlan, one of the principal SpamAssassin architects ha
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 06:13 ---
hmm.. i didnt have any problem scanning that message.
2004-10-06 13:12:22 [29542] i: connection from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]
at port 40076
2004-10-06 13
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3855
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 06:09 ---
The last comment (probably the last 2 comments) sound like the same problem as
bug 3826. For what it is worth, I see no evidence of either of the last 2 on
our sy
Daniel Quinlan, one of the principal SpamAssassin architects had
some good suggestions for reducing false positives in the SURBL
data. One was using public databases of URIs, particularly
hand-built ones like dmoz.org and wikipedia.org or even yahoo.com
as sources of mostly legitimate domains. (T
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3874
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 02:21 ---
Subject: Re: New: Definitions of internal/trusted networks too vague
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3874
>
> Thanks - an apologies for the r
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 02:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=2420)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2420&action=view)
Spam message possibly causing the problem
I think (but
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3874
Summary: Definitions of internal/trusted networks too vague
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priori
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3870
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 00:48 ---
Subject: Re: Re-order header stripping so that rules can look at headers
before stripping
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 12:40:05AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> S
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3870
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 00:40 ---
I checked this (admittedly on 2.64) and in fact 'full' already has the old SA
headers stripped.
So unless this changed on 3.0, you really can't check for bogus S
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 23:27 ---
Hi.
Thank you for the suggestions on what is causing the problem with Razor not
working along side with SpamAssassin. I was running razor with SpamAssassin
whi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 21:36 ---
So what else can I provide to help figure this out?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the
[moving to dev since there's nothing private at this point]
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:59:23PM -0500, Michael Parker wrote:
[discussion about having the parent doing forking for bayes expire, etc.]
> I looked at this briefly today. There are some Apache::*
> modules that we could mimic to accompl
On Tuesday, October 5, 2004, 5:16:43 PM, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:05:18PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
>> Kelsey Cummings writes:
>> > What if you were to have a friendly ISP that would be willing to send you
>> > an anonymized data feed that looked something like:
>> >
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kelsey Cummings writes:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:05:18PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> > Kelsey Cummings writes:
> > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:25:55AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> > > > > 4. SURBL query traffic
> > > >
> > > > > mostly good
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 05:05:18PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> Kelsey Cummings writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:25:55AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> > > > 4. SURBL query traffic
> > >
> > > > mostly good if you subtract the blacklisted ones
> > >
> > > But any big, as-yet-undetected sp
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3870
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 17:13 ---
Subject: Re: Re-order header stripping so that rules can look at headers
before stripping
Ah, I didn't know that. Will try it.
--- You are receiving t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kelsey Cummings writes:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:25:55AM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
> > > 4. SURBL query traffic
> >
> > > mostly good if you subtract the blacklisted ones
> >
> > But any big, as-yet-undetected spam domains can also generate
64 matches
Mail list logo