Re: mass-check with 2.60 vanilla

2004-10-07 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > sure -- have you got a particular tarball in mind? could you put one > up, if you're requesting it ;)? Vanilla 2.60 as it was originally released. 5d23aa5ddb1c5381281cd88bf734341f Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60.tar.gz Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan

Re: mass-check with 2.60 vanilla

2004-10-07 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Quinlan writes: > Guys, > > Can you do a vanilla 2.60 mass-check (local rules, no Bayes, no net) > starting with corpus messages received before the 2.60 release up until > today? > > Something like: > > ./mass-check --after='-13 months' >

[Bug 3883] [review] Spamcop reporting uses whole GECOS field, not just the name

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3883 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 15:55 --- +1 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 3883] [review] Spamcop reporting uses whole GECOS field, not just the name

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3883 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org

mass-check with 2.60 vanilla

2004-10-07 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Guys, Can you do a vanilla 2.60 mass-check (local rules, no Bayes, no net) starting with corpus messages received before the 2.60 release up until today? Something like: ./mass-check --after='-13 months' This is for an analysis and technical report on perceptron ranging that Henry and I are w

[Bug 3883] Spamcop reporting uses whole GECOS field, not just the name

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3883 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 15:36 --- Created an attachment (id=2428) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2428&action=view) suggested patch --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 3883] Spamcop reporting uses whole GECOS field, not just the name

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3883 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 15:33 --- "See also: "man 4 passwd" on IRIX" Don't have an IRIX box handy... :( I'm not really sure why we need a real name there at all actually. --- You are recei

[Bug 3876] [review] Bayes tokenizer method creates space wasting hash

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 15:30 --- +1 but a comment about the POD addition: +NOTE: The hash value has changed since it was first introduced, you +can test for backwards compatability by checking t

[Bug 3854] [review] _TESTSSCORES_ doesn't list anything for no hit rules

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3854 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3734] [review] Why are the URIBL rules header and not body?

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3734 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3865] Config option w/o parameter sets value to 0

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3865 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 13:15 --- Subject: Re: Config option w/o parameter sets value to 0 On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 01:09:55PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 3.1 seems to do the right thing for

[Bug 3865] Config option w/o parameter sets value to 0

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3865 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 13:14 --- Found it. Suggest we merge r53754 to the 3.0 branch. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching th

[Bug 3865] Config option w/o parameter sets value to 0

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3865 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 13:09 --- 3.1 seems to do the right thing for this case: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "" is not valid for "required_hits", skipping: required_hits --- Y

[Bug 3875] [review] Bayes tokenizer method uses a lot of memory when hashing raw tokens

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3875 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3855] [review] whitelist_from in local.cf ignored after whitelist_from loaded from users prefs

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3855 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 11:37 --- Subject: Re: [review] whitelist_from in local.cf ignored after whitelist_from loaded from users prefs On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:30:56AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Bug 3855] [review] whitelist_from in local.cf ignored after whitelist_from loaded from users prefs

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3855 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 11:30 --- Subject: Re: [review] whitelist_from in local.cf ignored after whitelist_from loaded from users prefs On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:23:20AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Bug 3855] [review] whitelist_from in local.cf ignored after whitelist_from loaded from users prefs

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3855 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|whitelist_from in local.cf |[review] whitelist_from in

[Bug 3886] update URIBL whitelist with persistent high volume only

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3886 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Future |3.1.0 --- Additional Comment

[Bug 3886] New: update URIBL whitelist with persistent high volume only

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3886 Summary: update URIBL whitelist with persistent high volume only Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW

[Bug 3885] Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus::is_razor2_available

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3885 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 11:04 --- Subject: Re: New: Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus::is_razor2_available On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 09:06:17AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[Bug 3855] whitelist_from in local.cf ignored after whitelist_from loaded from users prefs

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3855 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 10:42 --- good as a fix for 3.0.0 (assuming "make test" likes it). I have a longer-term fix for 3.1.0 btw, but that's much more invasive. --- You are receiving this

[Bug 3855] whitelist_from in local.cf ignored after whitelist_from loaded from users prefs

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3855 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 10:34 --- Created an attachment (id=2427) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2427&action=view) Patch File I don't know how much I like this patch. It

[Bug 3885] New: Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus::is_razor2_available

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3885 Summary: Undefined subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus::is_razor2_available Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: PC OS/Version:

Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Possible large whitelist from DMOZ data

2004-10-07 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Michele Solutions wrote: >> Although directories such as DMOZ are manually edited there is a danger of >> spammers "grabbing" expired domains and abusing them. I've seen a lot of >> scripts for sale that track dmoz listed domains. Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks. That's defi

Re: Possible large whitelist from DMOZ data

2004-10-07 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Those are all good ideas. Do you know if spammer links do get > deleted? How do the folks who maintain the sites find abusers or > bots? Wikipedia tends to find them eventually. Sometimes, spam links can live on a page or two, so higher count links are g

[Bug 3884] New: spamd: wrong ident and facility in syslog messages

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3884 Summary: spamd: wrong ident and facility in syslog messages Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.0.0 Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Pri

[Bug 3883] Spamcop reporting uses whole GECOS field, not just the name

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3883 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|Future |3.0.1 --- Additional Comment

[Bug 3882] Failing to open auto-whitelist produces unpredictable scores

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3882 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 08:06 --- Even after fixing my setup, I still see an occasional message with USER_IN_WHITELIST, even from users that certainly are not whitelisted. Typically this happ

RE: [SURBL-Discuss] Possible large whitelist from DMOZ data

2004-10-07 Thread Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Solutions
> Daniel Quinlan, one of the principal SpamAssassin architects > had some good suggestions for reducing false positives in the > SURBL data. One was using public databases of URIs, > particularly hand-built ones like dmoz.org and wikipedia.org > or even yahoo.com as sources of mostly legitimate do

[Bug 3883] New: Spamcop reporting uses whole GECOS field, not just the name

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3883 Summary: Spamcop reporting uses whole GECOS field, not just the name Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.0.0 Platform: SGI OS/Version: IRIX Status: NEW Se

Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Possible large whitelist from DMOZ data

2004-10-07 Thread Jeff Chan
On Thursday, October 7, 2004, 2:47:46 AM, Michele Solutions wrote: > Although directories such as DMOZ are manually edited there is a danger of > spammers "grabbing" expired domains and abusing them. I've seen a lot of > scripts for sale that track dmoz listed domains. Thanks. That's definite

[Bug 3882] New: Failing to open auto-whitelist produces unpredictable scores

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3882 Summary: Failing to open auto-whitelist produces unpredictable scores Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW

Re: Possible large whitelist from DMOZ data

2004-10-07 Thread Jeff Chan
On Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 11:26:33 AM, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > I would not suggest using either to whitelist automatically, but if you > get several of these sources and count the number of hits for each > domain, then you should be able to prioritize and possibly automatically > whitelist th

[Bug 3881] dnsbl lookups slow due to "sleep 1" in code

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You

[Bug 3826] required_score (required_hits) for specfic users seems to be broken

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additi

[Bug 3881] dnsbl lookups slow due to "sleep 1" in code

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-07 01:20 --- Created an attachment (id=2426) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2426&action=view) patch lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm to wait for DNSBL res

[Bug 3881] New: dnsbl lookups slow due to "sleep 1" in code

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881 Summary: dnsbl lookups slow due to "sleep 1" in code Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priori

[Bug 3878] use of uninitialized value in spamd version 3.0.0

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3878 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3880] New: blank lines after Spamassassin header causing issues with certain HTML emails

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3880 Summary: blank lines after Spamassassin header causing issues with certain HTML emails Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.0.0 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000

[Bug 3805] [review] Manual whitelist for URIDNSBL lookups

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3805 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 18:50 --- Actually ne.jp seems to be a legitimate second-level cctld, just like ac.jp or or.jp: http://whois.nic.ad.jp/cgi-bin/whois_gw?key=ne.JP/e JPNIC Whois Gateway -

[Bug 3879] Compatibility of our software with Spamassassin

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3879 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3879] Compatibility of our software with Spamassassin

2004-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3879 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSF