http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3907
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.1.0
--- Additional Comment
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3907
Summary: clean up HTML module
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Prio
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2170
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-18 16:43 ---
I have been using a rule to catch things after for months. It catches
quite a lot of spam. It also catches quite a lot of ham, typically things like
Traveloci
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2417
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-18 15:43 ---
Subject: Re: MIME_SUSPECT_NAME is not triggering on spam; triggering on ham.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
> > +1 on re
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2417
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-18 15:39 ---
Subject: Re: MIME_SUSPECT_NAME is not triggering on spam; triggering on ham.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 03:33:32PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -1 on removing
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2417
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-18 15:33 ---
Subject: Re: MIME_SUSPECT_NAME is not triggering on spam; triggering on ham.
> +1 on removing it. for reference, here's the corpus stats:
-1 on removing it. T
> +1 on removing it. for reference, here's the corpus stats:
-1 on removing it. This test should be moved to the anti-worm plugin.
It's actually an excellent anti-virus test.
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan ApacheCon! 13-17 November (3 SpamAssassin
http://www.pathname.com/~quinla
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-18 11:41 ---
doco update gets my vote. "-x" basically means "don't read user_prefs from the
user's home dir", and that's it; the doco doesn't explain that well at all
howeve
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3195
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-18 11:38 ---
How long before some kind of XML support? I'd assumed it would be at least
months away (that was 7 months ago) and wanted to do something about the FP's in
the me
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3252
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3195
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
--- Additional Comment
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3136
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2211
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2947
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-18 11:11 ---
Subject: Re: spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:02:29AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -x (nouser-config)
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2170
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-18 11:02 ---
Subject: Re: spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:57:48AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -x (nouser-config) do
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1399
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-18 10:57 ---
Subject: Re: spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users
-x (nouser-config) doesn't mean that there will be no user config
options, it means that y
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-18 10:16 ---
Subject: Re: spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:07:54PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> but it also needs to
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3906
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3238
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-18 07:24 ---
I am having a similar problem to what other people have described. I am
running FreeBSD and am
installing SpamAssassin using the FreeBSD port p5-Mail-SpamAssass
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3906
Summary: return spam scoring from "1.2" to "01.2" for correct
sorting
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-17 23:07 ---
'I'm fine changing line 490 to be:
my $copy_config_p = $opt{'user-config'};
Then down below at line 763 it'll still be disabled if max-con-per-child is 1.'
but it
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3822
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-17 23:04 ---
that script looks perfect btw! I really like the standalone script idea, as it
doesn't *need* to be part of Makefile.PL really, at all, and that script can be
ru
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3803
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-17 23:01 ---
thanks Christian!
I think I'm pro-1.0a over 1.0b as well, FWIW.
ps: I really like that border!
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are t
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2417
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-17 22:57 ---
+1 on removing it. for reference, here's the corpus stats:
0.002 0.0014 0.00440.240 0.450.10 MIME_SUSPECT_NAME
0.001 0.0017 0.1.00
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-17 20:16 ---
Correction...
"custom hacks AREN'T really something we want to play with"
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug,
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-17 20:15 ---
Yeah, but that is the thing. We install SpamAssassin directly for the CPAN
Distributions, custom hacks are really something we want to play with. When
this pat
30 matches
Mail list logo
