[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
> BTW we really need to go via bugzilla to discuss this. history
> has shown that there are too many issues and patches to deal with
> via the lists alone, and they *will* get lost that way.
Dean thinks the bugzilla license is onerous:
i have a bug to
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |minor
Summary|deprecate
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3934
Summary: allow safe use of spamd on a multiuser machine using
UNIX domain sockets and setgid spamc
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
> was: Re: [Bug 3931] [review] remove the annoying 'inhibited further
> callbacks' debug message
>
> >> (a) new debug code in 3.1.0 doesn't have higher debug levels
>
> > Really? That kind of sucks (although we never really
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3934
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You
was: Re: [Bug 3931] [review] remove the annoying 'inhibited further callbacks'
debug message
>> (a) new debug code in 3.1.0 doesn't have higher debug levels
> Really? That kind of sucks (although we never really used it anyway...)
While we have debug levels in trunk ...
- dbg()debugg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ok, opened as http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3934
BTW we really need to go via bugzilla to discuss this. history
has shown that there are too many issues and patches to deal with
via the lists alone, and they *will* get lost that wa
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 14:41 ---
would make a great Wiki page, and it'd be fine to place a VERY prominent link to
that in the POD I think.
the POD as it stands is too verbose -- adding more text
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 14:21 ---
The information is available in the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf docs but I feel
the problem is due to the size of that file the information does not jump out
at you
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 14:20 ---
It does but I feel it might slip past the user if it's not included in some way
in the distro. You do have the final say over these things, I'm just giving my
s
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3930
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.0.2
--- Additional Comment
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Justin Mason wrote:
> Both will break existing usage at other sites; some thought for backwards
> compatibility is required before we could apply those to the distribution.
> In particular, defaulting to only allowing -u for root would break
> a *lot* of existing users running
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 14:16 ---
Subject: Re: [review] remove the annoying 'inhibited further callbacks' debug
message
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:56:41PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (a) n
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 14:14 ---
Subject: Re: New: Add summary of important config options you should set first.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 02:12:35PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think it w
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3933
Summary: Add summary of important config options you should set
first.
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3680
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 13:49 ---
> to demonstrate the peoblem with Net::DNS being involved.
That should have been
to demonstrate the problem without Net::DNS being involved.
--- You are
Fred,
I noticed you mentioned in a bug comment about getting some information
using Ethereal. If you are also running Cygwin, could you help a bit
with bug #3917? I'm stuck because of some firewall issues that I have
not yet tracked down on the home machine where I can test.
What I'm trying to
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 13:30 ---
> Should I move this into a security ticket
If you do, you and I won't get to see it :-( [Insert rant about security
measures that make security more difficult].
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 13:09 ---
Subject: Re: [review] remove the annoying 'inhibited further callbacks' debug
message
+1 to remove
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 12:56 ---
(a) new debug code in 3.1.0 doesn't have higher debug levels
(b) I don't think anyone really needs to know this at all. I wrote it, and
it's never been a useful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dean gaudet writes:
> i wasn't ever fond of spamd trusting the User supplied by spamc -- and
> while identd is an OK hack for folks who run spamd on a network, it seems
> overkill for someone running spamd on localhost only. using unix domain
> so
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3925
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 12:39 ---
I agree it's a win32 issue and no kludges and no need to switch to a different
domain but let's return back to my comment #6 where I noticed it might be doing
so
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 12:18 ---
instead of disabling it, why not just make it require a higher debug level?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bu
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 12:17 ---
I already did this Justin, (great minds think alike) I found the point where it
crashes.
Should I move this into a security ticket, this is a potential DOS on SA
i wasn't ever fond of spamd trusting the User supplied by spamc -- and
while identd is an OK hack for folks who run spamd on a network, it seems
overkill for someone running spamd on localhost only. using unix domain
sockets there are two ways to increase the paranoia -- one would be to
pass c
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 12:12 ---
Subject: Re: URIDNSBL plugin crashes with certain messages
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:46:38AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Done it's bug 3930 Theo, what di
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 12:00 ---
I suspect we may be the first people to hit Net::DNS on the win32 platform with
this load level. a standalone test case using a static set of domains and
Net::DNS
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.0.2
--- You are receivin
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 11:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=2491)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2491&action=view)
fix
just comments the debug line. pls vote for 3.0.2,
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931
Summary: [review] remove the annoying 'inhibited further
callbacks' debug message
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> Errr. The code already does that in the new() area:
>
> $mailsaobject->{conf}->{razor2_timeout} = 10;
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 04:51:38PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > - my $timeout=$self->{main}->{conf}->{razo
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 11:46 ---
Done it's bug 3930 Theo, what did you mean in comment #9? I had a feeling
this might have something to do with it.
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3930
Summary: URIDNSBL plugin does not honor config option to limit
URLs.
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 11:41 ---
Subject: Re: URIDNSBL plugin crashes with certain messages
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:40:57AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, I verified using ethereal tha
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 11:40 ---
Ok, I verified using ethereal that surbl is not using the default value of 20
to limit the number of lookups performed. If this was fixed, it might fix the
prob
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 11:23 ---
Subject: Re: URIDNSBL plugin crashes with certain messages
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:12:25AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> P.S. URIDNSBL does have a defaul
Errr. The code already does that in the new() area:
$mailsaobject->{conf}->{razor2_timeout} = 10;
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 04:51:38PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - my $timeout=$self->{main}->{conf}->{razor_timeout};
> + my $timeout=$self->{main}->{conf}->{razor_timeout} || 10;
So the c
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 11:12 ---
I hacked my way around and found the same thing you did. If I can be of
assistance to help your testing I am here for another 5 hours plus I can work
on this fr
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 10:45 ---
I've done some more tests, but haven't nailed this yet. I determined that it is
not a matter of running out of file handles (descriptors). It does feel like
some b
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3922
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3899
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|3.0.0 |3.0.1
--- Additional Comment
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3922
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 05:07 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users
>
> synopsis: config leak across spamd child sessions
> version: 3.0.1
>
> one
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
when --max-conn-per-child=1 spamd children should drop root completely as
early as possible. actually i'd also suggest that when $setuid_to_user
you default $clients_per_child to 1 rather than 200 ... the extra paranoia
is worth more than the possibility of perf gain for most folks.
sorry -- i
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2754
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 21:38 ---
It remains a good spam rule here. With the lower score in 3.0.x, I think we're
OK. I'm on the road and so cannot do a full mass-check at this time, but a
quick
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3841
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 18:39 ---
At the time of the crash the handle count is 1,112
Memory usage is only 28,500k so that looks good.
These numbers are exactly the same for multiple runs so it look
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2754
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 18:29 ---
we could even drop it at this stage.
0.105 0.1571 0.00350.978 0.561.82 FROM_OFFERS
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 18:23 ---
I don't think that the check against HAS_NET_DNS has anything to do with
blaming NET::DNS for the problem. I expect that it is there because you
can not run the t
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2618
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2618
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2754
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 18:02 ---
The score is now lower... do we still want to change this rule?
score FROM_OFFERS 1.822 0.861 2.243 1.491
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 17:54 ---
Another thing for Fred or anyone else who can to check before I can:
In Task Manager, select the Processes tab, then View | Select Columns menu and
click the chec
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 17:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=2490)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2490&action=view)
Proposed patch to spamd 3.0.1
--- You are receiv
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929
Summary: Consider email aliases to find user for storing prefs
and bayes data
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3928
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3928
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 17:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=2489)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2489&action=view)
MSGID_DOLLARS false positive
--- You are receiv
61 matches
Mail list logo
