http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3922
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 16:25 ---
Subject: Re: make test failure for dnsbl on Solaris
As I already wrote in
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806#c35
Net::DNS is _not_
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3928
Summary: False Positive with MSGID_DOLLARS
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3928
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929
Summary: Consider email aliases to find user for storing prefs
and bayes data
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3929
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 17:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=2490)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2490action=view)
Proposed patch to spamd 3.0.1
--- You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2926
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2618
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2618
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3806
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 18:23 ---
I don't think that the check against HAS_NET_DNS has anything to do with
blaming NET::DNS for the problem. I expect that it is there because you
can not run the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2754
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 18:29 ---
we could even drop it at this stage.
0.105 0.1571 0.00350.978 0.561.82 FROM_OFFERS
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 18:39 ---
At the time of the crash the handle count is 1,112
Memory usage is only 28,500k so that looks good.
These numbers are exactly the same for multiple runs so it
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2754
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 21:38 ---
It remains a good spam rule here. With the lower score in 3.0.x, I think we're
OK. I'm on the road and so cannot do a full mass-check at this time, but a
quick
when --max-conn-per-child=1 spamd children should drop root completely as
early as possible. actually i'd also suggest that when $setuid_to_user
you default $clients_per_child to 1 rather than 200 ... the extra paranoia
is worth more than the possibility of perf gain for most folks.
sorry --
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 05:07 ---
Subject: Re: [review] spamd keeps user_prefs between scans with different users
synopsis: config leak across spamd child sessions
version: 3.0.1
one of
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3922
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3922
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 10:45 ---
I've done some more tests, but haven't nailed this yet. I determined that it is
not a matter of running out of file handles (descriptors). It does feel like
some
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 11:12 ---
I hacked my way around and found the same thing you did. If I can be of
assistance to help your testing I am here for another 5 hours plus I can work
on this
Errr. The code already does that in the new() area:
$mailsaobject-{conf}-{razor2_timeout} = 10;
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 04:51:38PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- my $timeout=$self-{main}-{conf}-{razor_timeout};
+ my $timeout=$self-{main}-{conf}-{razor_timeout} || 10;
So the conf
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 11:23 ---
Subject: Re: URIDNSBL plugin crashes with certain messages
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:12:25AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. URIDNSBL does have a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 11:40 ---
Ok, I verified using ethereal that surbl is not using the default value of 20
to limit the number of lookups performed. If this was fixed, it might fix the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 12:12 ---
Subject: Re: URIDNSBL plugin crashes with certain messages
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:46:38AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done it's bug 3930 Theo, what
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 12:17 ---
I already did this Justin, (great minds think alike) I found the point where it
crashes.
Should I move this into a security ticket, this is a potential DOS on
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 12:18 ---
instead of disabling it, why not just make it require a higher debug level?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3925
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 12:39 ---
I agree it's a win32 issue and no kludges and no need to switch to a different
domain but let's return back to my comment #6 where I noticed it might be doing
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 12:56 ---
(a) new debug code in 3.1.0 doesn't have higher debug levels
(b) I don't think anyone really needs to know this at all. I wrote it, and
it's never been a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 13:09 ---
Subject: Re: [review] remove the annoying 'inhibited further callbacks' debug
message
+1 to remove
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3924
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 13:30 ---
Should I move this into a security ticket
If you do, you and I won't get to see it :-( [Insert rant about security
measures that make security more difficult].
Fred,
I noticed you mentioned in a bug comment about getting some information
using Ethereal. If you are also running Cygwin, could you help a bit
with bug #3917? I'm stuck because of some firewall issues that I have
not yet tracked down on the home machine where I can test.
What I'm trying to
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 14:16 ---
Subject: Re: [review] remove the annoying 'inhibited further callbacks' debug
message
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:56:41PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(a)
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3930
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.0.2
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3933
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 14:20 ---
It does but I feel it might slip past the user if it's not included in some way
in the distro. You do have the final say over these things, I'm just giving my
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3934
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
was: Re: [Bug 3931] [review] remove the annoying 'inhibited further
callbacks' debug message
(a) new debug code in 3.1.0 doesn't have higher debug levels
Really? That kind of sucks (although we never really used it
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3934
Summary: allow safe use of spamd on a multiuser machine using
UNIX domain sockets and setgid spamc
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3916
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |minor
38 matches
Mail list logo
