Re: make test failures

2005-03-01 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Sidney Markowitz wrote: Even if, as I think, ~all is correct if you can enumerate all legal senders for the domain, there still is a problem with making our test depend on the current configuration of something that is being used for some other purpose. There is always the risk that there will be a

Re: make test failures

2005-03-01 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Sidney Markowitz wrote: Justin Mason wrote: According to the SPF people, we shouldn't be using -all on a domain that may possible emit mail. So I changed the record... If you can list all sending domains, sending ip addresses, and ISP mail servers that are allowed to send mail from a spamassassin

[Bug 4164] New: Trouble with usernames with . in them

2005-03-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4164 Summary: Trouble with usernames with . in them Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.0.2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 4163] RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

2005-03-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 13:04 --- Oh sorry, i meant not into learning part. Reporting should be a seperate feature, not combined with learning. It's time to go to bed :-) --- You are receivi

[Bug 4163] New: RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

2005-03-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163 Summary: RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: no

[Bug 1201] RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc

2005-03-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 12:41 --- Subject: Re: RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc > > What's your oppinion about that? > As a seperate command line argument, sure, open up a separate bug

[Bug 1201] RFE: add learning support to spamd/spamc

2005-03-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 12:39 --- I think it would make sense to introduce the report message as spam (spamassassin --report) feature into spamc/spamd learing part. So spamc -d xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -L

Re: make test failures

2005-03-01 Thread Justin Mason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sidney Markowitz writes: > Justin Mason wrote: > > According to the SPF people, we shouldn't > > be using -all on a domain that may possible emit mail > > Even if, as I think, ~all is correct if you can enumerate all legal > senders for the domain,

[Bug 3881] dnsbl lookups slow due to "sleep 1" in code

2005-03-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 01:04 --- Matt Seargent had some issues filing this in bugzilla, Copying his email from sa-dev Begin forwarded message: > From: Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date:

[Bug 4161] Inappropriate bayes.mutex initial file permission

2005-03-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4161 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 00:05 --- IMHO, "bayes_file_mode" shoule also be applied to the mutex file. Or, are there any correct way to share the baeyesian DB file? --- You are receiving this

Re: make test failures

2005-03-01 Thread Sidney Markowitz
Justin Mason wrote: > According to the SPF people, we shouldn't > be using -all on a domain that may possible emit mail Even if, as I think, ~all is correct if you can enumerate all legal senders for the domain, there still is a problem with making our test depend on the current configuration of