http://buildbot.spamassassin.org/t-solaris-10/builds/147/test_3/0
http://buildbot.spamassassin.org/t-sol10-561/builds/149/test/0
http://buildbot.spamassassin.org/t-sol10-561/builds/150/test/0
spamd_hup.t is failing -- intermittently -- since the ipv6
patch was applied. I haven't had a chance to l
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4972
Summary: 'oops, no id' from DNSBL lookup rules
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity:
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 05:22:19AM -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
> If it is a rule that requires new code to work, then the new code better in
> some way come with the new rule. Otherwise there is no point in
> distributing the (unworkable) rule, and no point in listing it in sa-update.
> (And, contr
> required. I'm not 100% definite though. let's see if anyone else
> weighs in ;)
As far as I'm concerned rulz is rulz.
If it is a rule that requires new code to work, then the new code better in
some way come with the new rule. Otherwise there is no point in
distributing the (unworkable) rule,
