https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6663
--- Comment #4 from Mark Martinec 2011-09-21 22:22:17
UTC ---
> My patch includes awl_mysql.sql, bayes_mysql.sql and userpref_mysql.sql
Where is the patch? Should probably be attached here.
> As a secondary question should UTF-8 or an
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6663
--- Comment #3 from Michiel Hazelhof 2011-09-21 20:37:09
UTC ---
Correction, didn't take the correct measurement regarding the utf8 vs latin,
latin costs about 1/3 compared to utf8.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/Spa
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6663
--- Comment #2 from Michiel Hazelhof 2011-09-21 20:21:21
UTC ---
Latin saves about 1.2% (database copy) but I can't verify whether the database
is still intact or not,
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/user
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6663
--- Comment #1 from Michiel Hazelhof 2011-09-21 19:47:19
UTC ---
Not sure wether `last_atime_delta` and `last_expire_reduce` could be unsigned,
as I haven't got enough test data.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAs
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6663
Michiel Hazelhof changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mich...@hazelhof.nl
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6663
Bug #: 6663
Summary: Use unsigned database fields for int
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 7
Status: NEW
Seve
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6660
Adam Katz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6649
--- Comment #13 from Darxus 2011-09-21 17:11:39 UTC ---
It would be nice if the build tests included a test to sa-compile a rule with
the full set of (binary) characters, verifying the output matches the input (as
I explain it doesn't in
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6649
--- Comment #12 from bpoliakoff 2011-09-21 17:00:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 4964
--> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4964
another problematic re2c input file from the sought ruleset
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6649
--- Comment #11 from bpoliakoff 2011-09-21 16:59:41 UTC ---
We're seeing further instances of this behavior with SOUGHT rules. I'm
attaching another file that causes re2c to segfault.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/S
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6649
bpoliakoff changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@reed.edu
--
Configure bugmai
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6633
--- Comment #14 from Mark Martinec 2011-09-21 16:03:34
UTC ---
> Mark: Now i can see problem isn't with bayes (btw, here is timing with
> bayes: timing:
>
> total 112630 ms - init: 12826 (11.4%), parse: 586 (0.5%),
> extract_message_met
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6633
--- Comment #13 from Marcin 2011-09-21 15:10:56 UTC ---
AXB: I think exim acl doesn't bring any new idea because i can reproduce this
problem using spamc. Imho problem is: why spamd idles and doesn't return any
response to client?
Mark:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6655
--- Comment #11 from Mark Martinec 2011-09-21 13:20:38
UTC ---
> Created attachment 4963 [details]
> Patch from Mark for Review
Note that this patch just improves error detection and improves
some minor points. The core of the problem
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6633
--- Comment #12 from John Hardin 2011-09-21 13:17:01 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Please notice: spamd scans this email through ~2 minutes then idles but spamc
> doesn't return results of scan. Spamc timeouts after 10 minutes. Thi
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6655
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[review] sa-update might|sa-update might DOS mirrors
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6655
--- Comment #10 from Kevin A. McGrail 2011-09-21 13:10:51
UTC ---
Created attachment 4963
--> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4963
Patch from Mark for Review
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6655
Mark Martinec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status Whiteboard|Needs 2 Votes for 3.3 |
|Branch
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6655
--- Comment #9 from Mark Martinec 2011-09-21 12:57:43
UTC ---
As a reminder: decoupling download from further unpacking and installation
of rules still needs to be done (so that a download is not repeated if
the installation of rules fa
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6655
Mark Martinec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.4.0
Severity|normal
Kevin wrote:
> - 3.4.0 will be the next release
> - 3.3.x development is ceased barring a major bug and we won't backport
> changes currently in trunk to 3.3
+1
> - Add 3.4 SVN branch and 3.4.0 as a version for Bugzilla
> - Add 3.4.1 as a version for Target Milestone
done.
> - Trunk switche
Individual votes aren't publicly discussed, sorry. But I can report this looks
like the plan.
Regards,
KAM
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
Did this get any votes either way, other than Kevin's?
On 09/14, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> So I think we have consensus from PMC members but just to be clear,
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6633
--- Comment #11 from Mark Martinec 2011-09-21 10:36:38
UTC ---
We still do not have a confirmation that the culprit is Bayes.
Marcin, please re-read what John Hardin has asked:
> I find it really difficult to believe that Bayes would c
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6633
--- Comment #10 from AXB 2011-09-21 10:25:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > > spamc cannot timeout after ten minutes when the default is 5
> > > -t *timeout*, --timeout=*timeout*
> > > Set the tim
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6633
--- Comment #9 from AXB 2011-09-21 10:14:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > spamc cannot timeout after ten minutes when the default is 5
> > -t *timeout*, --timeout=*timeout*
> > Set the timeout for spamc-to-spamd communicat
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6633
--- Comment #8 from Marcin 2011-09-21 10:10:20 UTC ---
> spamc cannot timeout after ten minutes when the default is 5
> -t *timeout*, --timeout=*timeout*
> Set the timeout for spamc-to-spamd communications (default: 600, 0
Are y
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6633
--- Comment #7 from AXB 2011-09-21 09:44:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Yes, i know this messages is huge. I've to scan such big emails (second option
> is to use diffrent spamd for big emails but it's not always possible). I'm
>
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6633
--- Comment #6 from Marcin 2011-09-21 09:29:30 UTC ---
Yes, i know this messages is huge. I've to scan such big emails (second option
is to use diffrent spamd for big emails but it's not always possible). I'm
using postgresql-9.0 as back
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6633
--- Comment #5 from AXB 2011-09-21 09:03:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 4962 [details]
> sample email
>
> Please try to scan this mail using spamc client.
Either I've missed something in this bug or:
You mean
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6633
--- Comment #4 from Marcin 2011-09-21 08:03:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 4962
--> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4962
sample email
Please try to scan this mail using spamc client.
--
Configure bugmail:
ht
30 matches
Mail list logo
