20140916: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20140916
20140916: Spam: 455648, Ham: 149141
The spam and ham counts on which this script alerts are from
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20140916
Click (source details) (it's tiny and low
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7083
Bug ID: 7083
Summary: Match anonymized/masked hosts
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7083
AXB axb.li...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
Bug ID: 7084
Summary: T_SMF_FM_FORGED_REPLYTO and FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO
seem identical.
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
--- Comment #1 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com ---
seem but they're not
# Test potential error in base rules
header __freemail_hdr_replyto eval:check_freemail_header('Reply-To:addr')
meta SMF_FM_FORGED_REPLYTO
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
--- Comment #2 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com ---
FTR: unless we have a bug in autopromoting T_* rules shouldn't be published
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
Mark London m...@psfc.mit.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
--- Comment #5 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com ---
disabled SMF_FM_FORGED_REPLYTO - ruleqa reports same hit rate as
FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO
Commit Modified /trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/smf/20_smf.cf
Committed revision 1625641.
--
You are
On 09/17/2014 06:12 PM, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
--- Comment #6 from John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org ---
(In reply to AXB from comment #5)
disabled SMF_FM_FORGED_REPLYTO - ruleqa reports same hit rate as
FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO
Given what I noted that's not too surprising.
The
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
--- Comment #7 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to John Hardin from comment #6)
(In reply to AXB from comment #5)
disabled SMF_FM_FORGED_REPLYTO - ruleqa reports same hit rate as
FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO
Given what I
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
--- Comment #8 from John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org ---
uncommented the ifplugin as well, and changed the subrule name in the meta so
that it's consistent.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6782
--- Comment #2 from Henrik Krohns h...@hege.li ---
Ok I steamed all evening to come up with something. I'll upload the
changes/diffs here before committing a large blob like this.. reviews,
suggestions, votes welcomed..
- Let's
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6782
--- Comment #3 from Henrik Krohns h...@hege.li ---
Created attachment 5235
-- https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5235action=edit
Complete diff vs current trunk
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6782
--- Comment #4 from Henrik Krohns h...@hege.li ---
Created attachment 5236
-- https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5236action=edit
All changed files for easy extraction/testing
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6782
--- Comment #5 from Henrik Krohns h...@hege.li ---
Created attachment 5237
-- https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5237action=edit
The cf that we might put into sa-update, for easy viewing here..
--
You are
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6782
Henrik Krohns h...@hege.li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|TLD update handling / |[REVIEW] TLD update
On 9/17/2014 7:05 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I guess it’s not a hot topic.
Or else it’s not well understood.
I think it's the later. The short circuit plugin is likely not that
much used so perhaps document the issue in the plugin as a needed
enhancement and update the bug.
Beyond that,
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6782
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6782
--- Comment #7 from Henrik Krohns h...@hege.li ---
Feel free to describe what you had in mind? Since Util-stuff do not have access
by design to any configuration or state data, I have a hard time imagining how
this would effectively
22 matches
Mail list logo
