https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7995
--- Comment #8 from Henrik Krohns ---
(In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #7)
> Ricardo, can you also take a look at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/spamassassin/
> DnsBlocklistsInclusionPolicy to make sure all is good
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7981
--- Comment #21 from Sidney Markowitz ---
Ok, I'll start a pre2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7981
--- Comment #20 from Henrik Krohns ---
Bug 7987 and Bug 7992 are now closed, since I consider them working enough with
usage format locked in for 4.0.0. Again, no issues related to actual usage and
functionality have been raised, aside from
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7992
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7987
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7981
--- Comment #19 from Sidney Markowitz ---
(In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #16)
> The Bugs 7987 and 7992 are not important to me for a 4.0 release. They
> could always be kicked to 4.0.1.
I'm not opposed to the idea, but since
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7981
--- Comment #18 from Sidney Markowitz ---
(In reply to Michael Storz from comment #17)
> about 7987:
> I'm about to go through all plugins and change the return codes.
Please fill out and submit an ICLA as soon as possible, so we can be
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7981
--- Comment #17 from Michael Storz ---
(In reply to Sidney Markowitz from comment #15)
> (In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #11)
> > Maybe time for pre2 soon?
>
> I'm seeing agreement for a pre2, but I would like clarification about
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7995
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kmcgr...@apache.org
--- Comment
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7981
--- Comment #16 from Kevin A. McGrail ---
(In reply to Sidney Markowitz from comment #15)
> (In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #11)
> > Maybe time for pre2 soon?
>
> I'm seeing agreement for a pre2, but I would like clarification
I've been using HashBL for eons so if Gio wants to consider whether his BTC
RBL can handle the load, I'm +1 for enabling it by default.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Thu,
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7996
Bug ID: 7996
Summary: Fix all "No description available"
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
On 2022-05-26 18:50, Henrik K wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 05:33:18PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2022-05-26 14:48, Bill Cole wrote:
> SA. Once it is switched on by default, it will be difficult to end or
> even substantially change in operation. We've handled DNSBLs dying
> well in the
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 05:33:18PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2022-05-26 14:48, Bill Cole wrote:
>
> > SA. Once it is switched on by default, it will be difficult to end or
> > even substantially change in operation. We've handled DNSBLs dying
> > well in the past on the project side, but
On 2022-05-26 14:48, Bill Cole wrote:
SA. Once it is switched on by default, it will be difficult to end or
even substantially change in operation. We've handled DNSBLs dying
well in the past on the project side, but it is also tough on the
operator of a DNSBL.
i would like to have plugins
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7981
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ar...@maven.pl
--
You are
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 08:48:13AM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 2022-05-25 at 23:59:36 UTC-0400 (Thu, 26 May 2022 06:59:36 +0300)
> Henrik K
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > Any objections enabling HashBL plugin by default for new installs?
> >
> > I think it's going to be useful in the future
On 2022-05-25 at 23:59:36 UTC-0400 (Thu, 26 May 2022 06:59:36 +0300)
Henrik K
is rumored to have said:
Any objections enabling HashBL plugin by default for new installs?
I think it's going to be useful in the future with all the new
features.
Only rule in stock rules using it at the moment
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7995
--- Comment #6 from Riccardo Alfieri ---
Ah, excellent. I'll start testing 4.x as soon as possible
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7995
--- Comment #5 from Henrik Krohns ---
(In reply to Riccardo Alfieri from comment #4)
>
> About these three functions:
>
> check_sh_hostname -- URIDNSBL already does this?
> check_sh_bodyuri_a -- URIDNSBL already does this?
>
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7995
--- Comment #4 from Riccardo Alfieri ---
I think you can safely postpone the TODO as those two functions are there but
there is no dataset to query (SBL is not 100% correct for this use case, we may
publish a dedicated zone in the future)
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7995
--- Comment #3 from Henrik Krohns ---
Quick status check on current trunk:
check_sh_helo -- check_hashbl_tag LASTEXTERNALHELO
check_sh_reverse -- check_hashbl_tag LASTEXTERNALDNS
check_sh_bodyemail -- check_hashbl_emails host option
22 matches
Mail list logo
