https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|REOPE
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
--- Comment #17 from Kevin A. McGrail ---
(In reply to RW from comment #16)
> (In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #15)
>
> > Thought: Why can't that ARGV_SIZE be like 256 to be a more sane limit.
>
> The trouble with this is that i
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
--- Comment #16 from RW ---
(In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #15)
> Thought: Why can't that ARGV_SIZE be like 256 to be a more sane limit.
The trouble with this is that it supports a bad practice. If postfix can't do
it directly
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.4.2
Status|RESOLVE
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
Bill Cole changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sa-bugz-20080315@billmail.s
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
RW changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rwmailli...@googlemail.com
--- Comment #13 fro
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|REOPE
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
--- Comment #11 from Dirk ---
I know about the DEFINE, thanks, but i do not want to build my own packages.
Quoting the call from postfix does not work, so i will further use the
workaround by limiting within postfix.
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
--- Comment #10 from Kevin A. McGrail ---
(In reply to Dirk from comment #9)
> Sorry, missed the error line :-D
>
> [root@nwomx local]# spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f
> dirk.traen...@nwowhv.de te...@gmail.com te...@gmail.com te...@gmail
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
--- Comment #9 from Dirk ---
Sorry, missed the error line :-D
[root@nwomx local]# spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f dirk.traen...@nwowhv.de
te...@gmail.com te...@gmail.com te...@gmail.com te...@gmail.com te...@gmail.com
te...@gmail.com te.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
--- Comment #8 from Dirk ---
Hi,
thanks for the reply and sorry for the "wrong" subject!
To proof the behaviour:
This works fine:
[root@nwomx local]# spamc -e /usr/sbin/sendmailx -oi -f dirk.traen...@nwowhv.de
te...@gmail.com te...@gmail
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
--- Comment #7 from Kevin A. McGrail ---
Fair enough that you might have a bug but spamc does NOT bounce emails hence
the confusion.
However, the call from postfix to spamc is an integration issue it seems.
Can you demonstrate this issue f
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
Dirk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
--- Comment #5 from Dirk ---
(In reply to Benny Pedersen from comment #4)
> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Split-multiple-recipient-mail-td48458.
> html
>
> its multirecipient limit
>
> _destination_recipient = 1
>
> mta stage is n
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
Benny Pedersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@junc.eu
--- Comment #4 from B
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
Dirk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirk.traen...@nwowhv.de
Status|R
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518
AXB changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
18 matches
Mail list logo
