Re: [VOTE] Apache Spark 2.1.1 (RC2)

-1 (non-binding) Python packaging doesn't seem to have quite worked out (looking at PKG-INFO the description is "Description: ! missing pandoc do not upload to PyPI "), ideally it would be nice to have this as a version we upgrade to PyPi. Building this on my own machine results in a longe

Re: [VOTE] Apache Spark 2.1.1 (RC2)

+1 Xiao 2017-03-30 16:09 GMT-07:00 Michael Armbrust : > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version > 2.1.0. The vote is open until Sun, April 2nd, 2018 at 16:30 PST and > passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Ap

Re: Pull Request Made, Ignored So Far

Hi John, Thanks for pinging about this. It does look useful, but I'll admit 3 days isn't a long time since there are so many (hundreds) of open PRs. I'll see if I can take a look soon (or others should feel free to as well). I'd also recommend checking out the surrounding code and pinging the c

Pull Request Made, Ignored So Far

Hi all, I’m a new Spark contributor who put in a pull request a few days ago: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17459 It’s a relatively small, isolated change that should be pretty simple to review. It has been a big help in the main project I’m

Re: planning & discussion for larger scheduler changes

filed [SPARK-20178] Improve Scheduler fetch failures - ASF JIRA | | | | || | | | | | [SPARK-20178] Improve Scheduler fetch failures - ASF JIRA | | | | Tom On Thursday, March 30, 2017 1:21 PM, Tom Graves wrote: If we are worried about major ch

Re: [Important for PySpark Devs]: Master now tests with Python 2.7 rather than 2.6 - please retest any Python PRs

Thanks, retrigger serveral pyspark PRs Hyukjin Kwon 于2017年3月30日周四 上午7:42写道： > Thank you for informing this. > > On 30 Mar 2017 3:52 a.m., "Holden Karau" wrote: > > Hi PySpark Developers, > > In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19955 / > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17355, as