Hi HeartSaVioR,
> It might be due to empty batch
Yeah...that's my understanding too. It's for a streaming aggregation in
Append output mode so that's possible. I'll have a closer look at it.
Thanks much for keeping up with this and the other questions. Much
appreciated!
Pozdrawiam,
Jacek Laskow
Maybe let’s ask the folks from Lightbend who helped with the previous scala
upgrade for their thoughts?
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 8:24 PM Xiao Li wrote:
> 1. On the technical side, my main concern is the runtime dependency on
>> org.opencypher:okapi-shade. okapi depends on several Scala libraries.
thanks jon!
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:25 PM Jon Kuroda wrote:
>
> Jenkins is back up and building. Build queue purged, builders are building.
> Fiat Lux --Jon
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 1:58 PM Shane Knapp wrote:
>>
>> finally, some good news! power was just restored to campus.
>>
>> i'm abou
>
> 1. On the technical side, my main concern is the runtime dependency on
> org.opencypher:okapi-shade. okapi depends on several Scala libraries. We
> came out with the solution to shade a few Scala libraries to avoid
> pollution. However, I'm not super confident that the approach is
> sustainable
Thanks for the feedback. I am preparing a doc and a PoC, will post soon.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:17 AM Wenchen Fan wrote:
> I'm fine with the view definition proposed here, but my major concern is
> how to make sure table/view share the same namespace. According to the SQL
> spec, if there is
I'm fine with the view definition proposed here, but my major concern is
how to make sure table/view share the same namespace. According to the SQL
spec, if there is a view named "a", we can't create a table named "a"
anymore.
We can add documents and ask the implementation to guarantee it, but it
