Re: cutting 1.6.2 rc and 2.0.0 rc this week?

This is only my opinion, but, I really do not expect a 1.7.0. I can imagine a 1.6.3 bug fix release in a few months, but kind of doubt it would continue much past that. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Stephen Hellberg wrote: > Sean Owen wrote >> Clearly we need to keep the 1.x line going for a b

Re: cutting 1.6.2 rc and 2.0.0 rc this week?

Sean Owen wrote > Clearly we need to keep the 1.x line going for a bit... Is there any perspective on just how long 'a bit' might be? I'm not sure I've found any prior description in our community of a (long-term?) support commitment previously - are we talking months, or years? -- View this m

Re: cutting 1.6.2 rc and 2.0.0 rc this week?

+1 Tom On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 2:01 PM, Reynold Xin wrote: It's been a while and we have accumulated quite a few bug fixes in branch-1.6. I'm thinking about cutting 1.6.2 rc this week. Any patches somebody want to get in last minute? On a related note, I'm thinking about cutting 2

Re: cutting 1.6.2 rc and 2.0.0 rc this week?

That's be awesome to have another 2.0 RC! I know many people who'd consider it as a call to action to play with 2.0. +1000 Pozdrawiam, Jacek Laskowski https://medium.com/@jaceklaskowski/ Mastering Apache Spark http://bit.ly/mastering-apache-spark Follow me at https://twitter.com/jaceklaskows

Re: cutting 1.6.2 rc and 2.0.0 rc this week?

Should we backport https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13424 to 1.6.2 ? On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:02 AM andy petrella wrote: > +1 both too > (for tomorrow lunchtime? ^^) > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:06 AM Raymond Honderdors < > raymond.honderd...@sizmek.com> wrote: > >> +1 for both >> >> Get O

Re: cutting 1.6.2 rc and 2.0.0 rc this week?

+1 both too (for tomorrow lunchtime? ^^) On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:06 AM Raymond Honderdors < raymond.honderd...@sizmek.com> wrote: > +1 for both > > Get Outlook for Android > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:23 PM +0300, "Michael Armbrust" < > mich...@databricks.com> wrot

Re: cutting 1.6.2 rc and 2.0.0 rc this week?

+1 for both Get Outlook for Android On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:23 PM +0300, "Michael Armbrust" mailto:mich...@databricks.com>> wrote: +1 to both of these! On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Sean Owen mailto:so...@cloudera.com>> wrote: 1.6.2 RC seems fine to me; I don't

Re: cutting 1.6.2 rc and 2.0.0 rc this week?

+1 to both of these! On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Sean Owen wrote: > 1.6.2 RC seems fine to me; I don't know of outstanding issues. Clearly > we need to keep the 1.x line going for a bit, so a bug fix release > sounds good, > > Although we've got some work to do before 2.0.0 it does look li

Re: cutting 1.6.2 rc and 2.0.0 rc this week?

1.6.2 RC seems fine to me; I don't know of outstanding issues. Clearly we need to keep the 1.x line going for a bit, so a bug fix release sounds good, Although we've got some work to do before 2.0.0 it does look like it's within reach. Especially if declaring an RC creates more focus on resolving

Re: cutting 1.6.2 rc and 2.0.0 rc this week?

Any word on Kafka 0.10 support / SPARK-12177 I understand the hesitation, but is having nothing better than having a standalone subproject marked as experimental? On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Reynold Xin wrote: > It's been a while and we have accumulated quite a few bug fixes in > branch-1.6

cutting 1.6.2 rc and 2.0.0 rc this week?

It's been a while and we have accumulated quite a few bug fixes in branch-1.6. I'm thinking about cutting 1.6.2 rc this week. Any patches somebody want to get in last minute? On a related note, I'm thinking about cutting 2.0.0 rc this week too. I looked at the 60 unresolved tickets and almost all