On 08/31/2012 02:38 PM, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
My input below.
On 08/31/12 09:42, Wojciech Meyer wrote:
The two significant ones (as far as I can understand):
- as I heard from Christopher Bergström that it's hard to push the
stdcxx to FreeBSD ports repository (I can understand it and that
On 08/31/2012 12:52 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
On 08/31/12 14:15, Stefan Teleman wrote:
My understanding is that 4.2.x and 4.3.x are bugfix/rfe releases while
5.x would become C++2011.
There is an implicitly stated binary incompatibilit
On Sep 1, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
>> [...]
>> This pretty much sums up my first impression.
>
> [...]
> To begin with: the compiler flags/GNUmakefile changes are very
> specific to the SunPro compilers and to our internal b
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
> Hi Stefan, I have went through the patches. Specifically, I have spent more
> time looking in the mutex alignment changes and the C++ C library headers
> patches, and I only read the others. In order:
>
> The test extensions seem to be genui
On 08/31/12 08:58, "C. Bergström" wrote:
On 08/31/12 07:40 PM, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
Please correct me if I am wrong.
I have seen two forks on github, one belonging to C. Bergstrom/Pathscale and
the other to Stefan Teleman.
The first one contains a number of genuine code changes outside the Ap
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
> Would someone please apply the patch on 4.2.x branch? (I have not yet
> regained access to my Apache account.)
>
>
> 2012-09-01 Liviu Nicoara
>
> * tests/containers/23.bitset.cpp: swapped lines to avoid compiler
> bug
> (se
On 08/31/12 12:20, Stefan Teleman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Liviu Nicoara wrote:
Stefan's seem like a complete git-ification of the whole Apache repository
but with no changes I could detect.
Not quite. :-)
[...]
The official Oracle port for Solaris 10 and 11, which I maintain,
On Aug 31, 2012, at 5:24 PM, Wojciech Meyer
wrote:
> Libstc++
> is LGPL therefore can link with GPL project, and can link with ALv2
> project, but stdcxx is ALv2 and cannot link with GPL project.
>
> That's basically what LGPL was designed for, to solve this problem.
>
Nope... LGPL was desig
On Aug 31, 2012, at 5:24 PM, Wojciech Meyer
wrote:
> Jim Jagielski writes:
>
>> On Aug 31, 2012, at 2:27 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/ 1/12 01:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Are you suggesting that FreeBSD does not allow the inclusion of ANY
ALv2 library under its ports dir
Would someone please apply the patch on 4.2.x branch? (I have not yet regained
access to my Apache account.)
2012-09-01 Liviu Nicoara
* tests/containers/23.bitset.cpp: swapped lines to avoid compiler bug
(see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54442)
Index: tests/
10 matches
Mail list logo
